Reelpol

Published Ventura County Star opinion columns and travel journals

My Photo

About

Categories

  • 2010 Getting our Kicks on Route 66 Tour
  • Boston/London/Paris
  • Cessna Chronicles
  • Christmas Letter
  • Crewing on the Caribbean
  • Galapagos Gazette
  • Power Points of Speeches
  • Reelpolitik Books
  • Tales of Turkey & Greece
  • Ventura County Star Columns

Recent Posts

  • TELLING THE STORIES OF A THINNING NUMBERS OF VETS
  • Boston London and Paris: Trip of a Lifetime
  • BIDEN'S GAFFE-PRONE REPUTATION REMAINS INTACT
  • SEARCH GOES ON FOR A PALATABLE GOP CANDIDATE
  • GENDER EQUALITY ELUDES BOTH OVAL OFFICE AND CORNER OFFICE
  • NATIONAL PRIDE TAKES THE COURT IN LITHUANIA
  • IT'S FIVE MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT; DOES ANYONE CARE?
  • COUNTY BRACES FOR DIRTY WORK BY SUPER PACS
  • MAKING AND BREAKING NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTIONS
Add me to your TypePad People list

IT'S A BATTLE IN THE VALLEY FOR BERMAN AND SHERMAN

20120320_105945_do21-shebermanPublished on Wednesday, May 9, 2012 in the Ventura County Star

With the Democratic Party refusing to endorse a candidate and polls suggesting that no Democrat will come in second in the 26th Congressional District primary in Ventura County, I thought I might pay attention to the fireworks detonating in the 30th congressional district these days.

Representatives Brad Sherman, D-Sherman Oaks, and Howard Berman, D-Valley Village, — two veteran congressmen dumped into the same district by the California Citizens Redistricting Commission — are locked into a super-spending shootout for the San Fernando Valley seat.

When Brad Sherman, who sports an Adlai Stevenson hairline, used to campaign, he gave away plastic combs imprinted with the words, "You need this more than I do." Like Stevenson, who once quipped, "Eggheads of the world unite, you have nothing to lose but your yolks," Sherman is witty, eloquent and a liberal thinker. But unlike Stevenson, Sherman always wins elections.

Three significant connections still exist between Brad Sherman and Ventura County.

First, he represented the eastern portion of the county during the six years (1996-2002) he served as our representative from the 24th Congressional District. Although Elton Gallegly, R-Simi Valley, would assume his seat in January 2003, Sherman would turn east, take on and trounce Republican Robert M. Levy (62 to 38 percent) for the 27th District seat he holds today.

Second, back in 1996, Sherman would win his initial congressional office (24th District) by defeating Republican Rich Sybert. If the name Sybert sounds familiar, he is the guy Tony Strickland accused of tearing down his yard signs during the 1998 state Assembly primary. In fact, Strickland captured the red-faced Sybert red-handed — on videotape, no less.

Third, last February, when Ventura County Supervisor Steve Bennett was the frontrunner in the race for the 26th District — having already raised more than $241,000 for his campaign — Bennett shocked and awed delegates at the California Democratic Party Convention by announcing his decision to drop out. Immediately, local pundits and national political know-it-alls predicted that Brad Sherman would throw his duds into a carpetbag and his chapeau into the ring — after acquiring an appropriate Ventura County address.

Not only could Sherman have benefited by avoiding a costly, contentious faceoff against Berman, but also Board of Equalization member Betty Yee had already succeeded, with the assistance of other Berman backers, in keeping Sherman from garnering the Democratic Party's endorsement.

"It would be insane, self-destructive and wrong — horribly wrong" for the party to endorse Sherman, Yee argued in a letter distributed at the meeting — even before Bennett's seemingly unexpected revelation. She suggested that Sherman switch to the neighboring 26th District, which had become, post-redistricting, more Democrat-friendly than it had been during the decade Republican Rep. Elton Gallegly held sway. According to Yee, Sherman "knows Ventura County and Ventura County knows him."

But Sherman wasn't about to trade Sherman Oaks for Thousand Oaks. He was, in fact, eager to face off against his fellow congressman, despite the fact that the 90-year-old Hollywood sensation Betty White agreed to star in a Berman campaign ad with fellow cast-member from "Hot in Cleveland" Wendie Malick. The spot capitalizes on White's lifelong advocacy for critters, great and small, by touting Berman as "the Valley leader who fights for the humane treatment of all animals." And, as Ms. White coyly adds, "He has very nice blue eyes."

While both Democratic congressman tend to agree on most issues, Sherman made super PACs a litmus test early on by challenging Berman to renounce at least two such organizations that have arisen to financially back the 15-term congressman.

Sherman expects to be considerably outspent by Berman, yet a recent internal poll for Sherman finds the 8-term congressman ahead by 27 points in a potential general election matchup. That significant lead, however, is expected to diminish as November nears.

While Sherman's staff harbors no doubt that their candidate remains better known and more popular than Berman, they are even more heartened by demographics. The number of voters in the portion of the district currently represented by Sherman is almost double the number in Berman's.

A recent two-hour forum at the Valley Performing Arts Center, however, gave both Sherman and Berman the chance to prove that "a joke," at least according to Winston Churchill, "is a very serious thing." During the debate, Sherman kept needling Berman to finally cough up his income tax returns. When Berman promised "Friday," Sherman wondered — out loud — as to the reason Berman's Xerox machine seemed to function so slowly.

But Berman got the last laugh when radio host and moderator Bill Handel claimed Berman's response to his question about how to handle the federal deficit just didn't make any sense. "I guess I'm not Handel's messiah," quipped Berman. Adlai Stevenson would have been so proud.

May 08, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Adlai Stevenson, Betty White, Betty Yee, Bill Handel, Brad Sherman, Elton Gallegly, Howard Berman, Rich Sybert, Steve Bennett, Tony Strickland, Winston Churchill, Wndie Malick

TELLING THE STORIES OF A THINNING NUMBERS OF VETS

VeteransPublished on April 25, 2012 in the Ventura County Star

PARIS — We can see the Arc de Triomphe from our hotel room at Le Bristol. The massive monument — 164 feet in height — stands at the heart of a plaza presently known as Place Charles de Gaulle and serves as the center point of 12 outwardly radiating streets. Formerly known as Place Etoile, it was renamed in 1970 to honor the deceased general and president of France.

In 1990, the 100th anniversary of de Gaulle's birth, President Francois Mitterrand, de Gaulle's most formidable rival, checked the latest opinion polls, held his nose, and lied: "Gen. de Gaulle has entered the pantheon of great national heroes, where he ranks ahead of Napoleon and behind only Charlemagne."

"A hero is someone we can admire without apology," writes Kitty Kelley, the unauthorized biographer of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, Elizabeth Taylor, Frank Sinatra, Nancy Reagan and Oprah Winfrey. Slate's Michael Crowley, however, called her "the consummate gossip monger, a vehicle for all the rumor and innuendo surrounding her illustrious subjects."

Is Kelley confusing heroism with celebrity?

She's not alone. When administrators of the Gloria Barron Prize polled American teenagers about their heroes, Superman and Spider-Man were nominated twice as often as Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King or Abraham Lincoln.

Astoundingly, one in 10 claimed various winners on "American Idol" as their heroes.

"Hero" in Greek translates as "protector" or "defender," and referred to individuals who, in the face of danger or adversity, displayed significant courage or self-sacrifice. As Joseph Campbell, the master of myths wrote, "A hero is someone who has given his or her life to something bigger than oneself."

Heroes have stature, if not size. While "a hero is no braver than an ordinary man — but he is brave five minutes longer," according to Ralph Waldo Emerson, we also concur with respect to heroic traits.

A Cornell University business school study of 526 World War II combat veterans found that the 83 individuals decorated for battlefield valor described themselves as "loyal, self-disciplined, selfless and adventurous."

When boomers, who first arrived on the scene in 1946, got around to asking their fathers, "What did you do in the war, Daddy?" the members of the Tom Brokaw's "Greatest Generation" typically changed the subject. They held that their battlefield experiences were not an appropriate dinner table topic.

In fact, for many boomers, the initial 27 minutes of Steven Spielberg's "Saving Private Ryan," taught them that, indeed, those sexually uptight, politically conservative, Lawrence Welk-loving parents of theirs — qualified as bona fide heroes.

According to the 2009 American Community Survey, approximately 21.9 million military veterans live in the United States. California counts 2 million among its residents.

The largest chunk, 35 percent (7.6 million) served during Vietnam (1964-1975). Next up, 20.7 percent (4.5 million) fought during the Gulf War (Aug. 2, 1990 to present). Most important, however, is the total number of veterans from World War II (1941-1945) and the Korean War (1950-1953). It's fewer than 5 million and dwindling every day.

As the lyrics from "The Band Played Waltzing Matilda" poignantly points out, "But as year follows year, more old men disappear."

Their stories, however, are being read. In fact, first-person accounts of all wars, but particularly World War II and Korea, are flying off the shelves of bookstores. Publishers, who claim their readers yearn for a heroic-heavy peek behind the fog of war, say the military memoir genre has never been more popular.

Right here in Ventura County, Jannette Jauregui chronicles the lives of local veterans for The Star. In 2011, she compiled a number of them in her first book titled "Ventura County Veterans: World War II to Vietnam."

"We need heroes because they define the limits of our aspirations," writes Santa Clara University ethics scholar, Scott LaBarge. "We largely define our ideals by the heroes we choose, and those ideals — largely define us."

Yet, the greatest obstacle to the appreciation and adoption of heroes in this society seems to be a post-Watergate cynicism that is both corrosive and widespread.

The best antidote, responds LaBarge, "is realism about the limits of human nature. We are cynical because so often our ideals have been betrayed. Washington and Jefferson held slaves and Martin Luther King is accused of philandering and plagiarizing. We need to separate out the things that make our heroes noteworthy, and forgive the shortcomings that blemish their heroic perfection."

In a letter to Anthony Eden just before D-Day, Winston Churchill said of de Gaulle, "There is not a scrap of generosity about this man, who only wishes to pose as the saviour of France in this operation … he is a wrongheaded, ambitious and detestable Anglophobe."

Nevertheless, after VJ day and upon reflection, Churchill admitted, "I knew he was no friend of England, but I understood and admired, even while I resented his arrogant demeanor."

Arrogant demeanor? He's French.

April 29, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Boston London and Paris: Trip of a Lifetime

6a00d8341c8f3e53ef0168e9dd3042970c-580wiPreparation Day: 

Jon spent the day packing.  Beverly, however, was all finished, so she spent the morning at the spa getting beautified--mani-pedi, facial, etc.,  thanks to a birthday gift certificate from Doug and Donna. 

For those of you who asked, "Who is taking care of Chloe?" it's Sharon Morris of Pet Butlers.   We gave her a long list of instructions (both Jon and Beverly will miss Chloe much more than she will miss them) re: Chloe's medications, food, walk schedule and outfit de jour.   Sharon was also kind enough to agree to pick up our mail (we are an almost daily stop for Amazon) and to water the five house plants Beverly hasn't managed to kill. 

The idea that this trip is actually happening is starting to feel real.  Jon took care of all the transportation requirements and Beverly planned the itinerary.  Due to the fact that Beverly has something like 50,000 more miles with United than Jon, she gets to fly first class tomorrow--a first for her.  She's hoping to sit next to a famous author or literary agent so she can pitch her murder mystery.  BTW, she's about half way through writing The Oldest Missing Persons Case in Port Cabrillo.  The highlights of Beverly's itinerary include lots of art museums as well as a tour of Fenway Park, Stonehenge, High Tea at Harrods, and the sewers in Paris.  Here's a little quiz testing how well you know Jon and Beverly.  Which suitcase and backpack belongs to which traveler?

Day One--Getting There:

First Class is definitely not worth the money but paying with miles is an entirely different matter. Beverly had Seat 1A next to a guy who works for Titleist. He made it clear he was not into chitchat (even though he had two cellphones) and that's fine. Beverly needed to practice/time her presentation anyway. Mr Titleist was soooo busy rewriting his Power Point--he went through three erasers. Beverly wanted suggest he use less text and more photos but he didn't appear to be a fan of constructive criticism.


Jon was happy in Economy Plus with an exit row seat. He bought the Cinnamon Roll box and also chowed down on protein bars Beverly had packed. He loves to listen to pilots talking on the radio so he spent the whole trip tuned into the ATC channel.  After a sumptuous breakfast and because she was such a good girl for getting her work done, she watched Sherlock Holmes sequel flick with Robert Downey Jr. Arthur Conan Doyle was probably spinning in his grave---with Hollywood laying out his deductive logic in Matrix-style bullet time.


In the interest of full disclosure, Beverly's gear is the green suitcase and CLU backpack, but she actually loaded her makeup kit and rain-boots into Jon's suitcase when he wasn't looking.


We landed in Boston in a record 4hrs and 42 minutes. All the trees and shrubs are in bloom but our taxi driver Me. Leadfoot, went too fast to snap a photo.  Got this particular snapshot on foot.  Blossom


Beverly nearly went into a full meltdown when checking in the Marriott. She was so proud of herself for being super-organized for this trip. Was totally packed a day early, checked off every item on her checklist, and even cleaned out her purse---only taking essential credit cards and TSA approved containers. Then the time came to check into the Marriott. She had her registration confirmation in hand along with drivers license, but there was no credit card case. She couldn't imagine being homeless in Boston. Harrison, the desk clerk could see Beverly was going to lose it, so he suggested she dump everything out on the counter and sure enough, the credit card case had slipped behind the torn lining of her purse. Beverly & Jon were greeted by a fantastic view of the city when they opened the drapes to their room. They walked 6 blocks to Legal Seafood for a fabulous dinner. Jon had fresh scrod and chowder. Beverly had a fantastic Cesar salad with LOBSTER. Jon is watching a Red Sox game as Beverly pecks this out on her iPhone. Boy does that bed look inviting tonight.

 

6a00d8341c8f3e53ef0168e9f3950f970c-580wiDay Two--Fenway Park: 

Woke up to a beautiful sunny morning. It was the perfect day to tour the happiest spot in earth--at least according to Jon.  Tickets were sold out until 1PM so we had a couple of hours to kill. Jon discovered a place called the Monster Bar. The big draw is that the bar is at the bottom of the famous Green Monster Wall behind center field. We watched a couple of guys apply rectangles of green film to 48 panes of glass that used to be a roll-up door. It is protected by a huge wire fence, of course. Jon reported that in the Men's Room, there is another picture window above the urinal that looks out over the bar and all the patrons. I'll let you pick the metaphor that occurs to you. Jon enjoyed hot pretzels with mustard while Beverly was still full from her Egg Scramble breakfast @ Champions.


As we walked up the street to start the tour, we discovered sweet cherry blossoms on a sapling tree in front of Fenway and then, just as we turned the corner we were stopped by a news broadcaster from the Fox affiliate, Channel 25.  He wanted to interview us on camera. Apparently, we were attractive because we were attired, respectively in a 2004 Red Sox Tee (Beverly) and a Red Sox windbreaker (Jon). The thrust of the interview was the steep ticket prices. Jon, of course, came up with the killer quote: "The Red Sox are a bargain at any price." The journalist was suitably impressed when Jon told him he was a politician, and polite enough not to ask "Where the hell is Port Hueneme?"

 

Fenway is celebrating its 100th anniversary this year. It is the oldest ballpark in America. Second place goes to Wrigley Field (1924) and third place to Dodger Stadium (1962). Jon claims the tour was better than he expected. In addition to the $14 ticket price, Beverly, who isn't supposed to do stairs, climbed up FOUR STORIES and climbed back down. This jaunt did require a cane.

 

The highlights of the tour were: the locker room, the dugout, a view from the $165 (before scalping) seats above the Green Monster, and the press seats. We got Max ( don't tell him) a Red Six tee shirt in the Team Store. Apparently they don't let you leave unless you buy something. :>) We also enjoyed the bronze sculptures of Ted Williams and the little kid, as well as "The Teammates" which included Ted Williams, Bobby Doerr, Johnny Peske (he has a memorial foul pole in right field) and Dom DiMaggio. 527949_3245363046208_1030848964_32616410_611988556_n
On the way home the taxi driver offered to sell us game tickets but we've already got an extra full schedule.
Beverly said she really deserved the Mai tai Jon bought her at the hotel bar. Dinner tonight is @ Lucca--Italiano.

 

Day Three--Attending Sessions at the Conference and Concord:

Breakfast of Champions at "Champions." Jon had lox and bagel while I enjoyed the French toast with cornflake batter. Yummy. Caught the panel presented by Sisters in Crime. They were published mystery writers (Angela Gerst, Susan Fleet, Frankie Bailey and Mollie Freier) who were not only hilarious but also very informative. It apparently takes all kinds to write about murder and this group included a criminology professor, an attorney, a professional trumpet player and a professional writer who has dabbled in every genre from true crime to a series of books featuring a grouchy middle-aged male protagonist.

After the session was over we were supposed to head for the subway to meet Bob Morris, a business ethics professor at Boston University,  Revolutionary War historian who lives in Concord, and brother in law to Sharon, who was taking care of Chloe. Jon wanted to go back to the room to change his jacket. Beverly was afraid we were going to be late but while she was waiting at the elevators, who should stroll by but George Takai. He was speaking at the conference but was very sweet about shaking my hand and talking about his work--especially his new role as the producer of wall photos for Facebook. He still has his signature deep, dripping-with-honey voice and stands about 5'8". Beverly decided that asking to take his photo with her phone was too Star Trek geeky. Besides everybody knows what he looks like--just picture Sulu in a trench coat. Takai has apparently never aged.

LIttle women houseThe subway wasn't that difficult to navigate although we did have to change trains at Downtown Crossing. The first thing we saw in Concord was Minute Man Park. There was a fantastic multimedia presentation that set up the whole Lexington-Concord battles as well as the Paul Revere and Richard Dawes and Dr. Prescott rides to warn the colonists that the British regulars were on their way. At the North Bridge, 400 Minute Men sent 95 redcoats into retreat Bob also showed us Nathaniel Hawthorne's house. Hawthorne bought it from Bronson Alcott, the father of Louisa May. Next was the house of Ralph Waldo Emerson. The great thing about Emerson was that he was eminently quotable about just about everything but unfortunately his writings have been neglected of late. Not so re: Henry David Thoreau.
Thoreau bookstore

Our last stop was a funky gift shop that featured all kinds of Thoreau books and everything from coffee cups to notecards to tee shirts with Thoreau quotes. Jon got a "Time is but a stream I go a-fishin in" tee-shirt, a Thoreau book about Cape Cod and a bumper sticker that said," Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes." The clerk at the gift ship was Richard Smith, an actor from Akron, Ohio, who portrays Thoreau in one-man shows.

When we toured the Louisa May Alcott house (The Orchard) we found out that Thoreau did all the carpentry work when Bronson Alcott decided to move the tenant farmer house (1698) and join it to the main house (1700). Our guide was an elderly lady who was experiencing lots of senior moments. She did have some interesting tidbits to share including Louisa May's stint as a nurse during the Civil war. It wasn't her father but rather she who went to war and after Little Women and Little Men, supported the family. She caught typhoid during the war and was was treated with mercury which aged her face 20 years. Her father Bronson started a utopian school which, when he decided to admit black students, failed. The parents of the white students pulled their kids out.


Walden PondWhen we were at lunch downtown at a Greek place (served three deli salads for $6.99), Bob remarked that although Concord had lots of rich residents, it was 92% Democrat. Jon pointed out that Concord had always attracted the liberals starting with transcendentalists like Alcott, Emerson and Hawthorne who were also abolitionists. Bob told us the town is still a direct democracy with town meetings instead of representative city council members. Bob and his wife were transplants from Orange County 15 years ago. Imagine the culture shock!

Isn't Walden Pond the most peaceful place?  It was really raining too hard to get down to the shore but we were able to feel the ambience from across the road and capture it with the iPhone.


Bob took us back to the subway and we were lucky to get seats on both the red and orange trains. We walked over to the Salty Pig, a new college hangout that served tapas and pizzas. Jon was in heaven watching the Bruins playing the Capitols in the first round of the Stanley Cup playoffs. We ordered a pitcher of Sangria, salads and a prosciutto and red pepper pizza. We sat at the bar in front of the oven and got to watch the chef whipping up one delicious looking pizza after another. A very full day!

 

Day Four--Conference Presentations and an abbreviated Freedom Trail Tour

Beverly has reached the age when she isn't about to allow her derrière to grow numb in order to listen to just any convention paper. The panel on TV shows adapted from books was well worth the time. The first paper was about "Rizzoli & Isles." The scholar wasn't able to support her case that this was a lesbian relationship but she was able to demonstrate reverse class distinctions (blue collar folks hold the dominant position in the show). The major difference between the books and screenplays, as she pointed out, was that the relationship between both women was primarily professional in the former and sexually intimate (a big stretch for most of us) in the latter.


The second scholar examined the Showtime series "Dexter." Before she got into the TV show, she traced out the crime-scape that is Florida (which is the setting of "Dexter"). She took exception, as a psychologist, to the thesis that Dexter couldn't help killing because he had been traumatized as a child (witnessing his mother's murder). She described the appeal of the show with an apt metaphor. Dexter is like watching a bear on roller skates, who, every so often, chomps off somebody's head. Img_17124g8xvo9c-1


The best was last with a compare/contrast between "Murder She Wrote" and "Castle." Her focus was the Nikki Heat books (supposedly written by Richard Castle) that have actually become best sellers on their own. "Castle and the books for her, was like an infinite number of reflections within a pair of mirrors. My question for her was "what is the identity of the pseudo-books real author?" My theory is that the entrepreneurial team that write the show, also write the books. She thought it was a real mystery writer named Frye, whose name as benefactor is on some award Castle supposedly won. The discussion afterward was very lively.


JOn and MarkThe afternoon panel Jon wanted to see was an interview with Mark Volman, the co-founder of the Turtles (Happy Together, Eleanor, Exactly What You Do) as well as Flo (Florescent Leech) & Eddie and later as a background vocalist for Frank Zappa and T Rex. He is currently a college professor @ Belmont College in Nashville. How he got there was a fascinating 90 minutes. He first shared with all us academics about having to recently flunk a student who only turned in 15% of her work and was absent 8 times. Her response was classic. "But I thought you were so cool." We all howled. He now teaches music as a business---lots of lessons he learned the hard way. When he decided to enroll in college at 40, he chose Loyola Marymount. The Dean there was smart enough to also hire him to teach while he concurrently got a BA in Communication and MA in Film Theory. As a freshman he found out that Mark Bowlan's (T Rex) son, who hadn't even been born when Bowlan died in a car crash, was also a freshman at Loyola. They became buddies and big Mark told little Mark all about the father he never knew. Lots of Kleenex appeared after that story. Before the interview Jon and I introduced ourselves to Mark. Jon had worked with Tom Brown, who was a good friend of Volman's. Jon wanted to tell him that Tom just got a book published titled "Summer of Love, My Ass." He saw my nametag and shared that he had produced an album with a couple of CLU grads as well. Small world.


Lantern patriotsAfter the panel, we caught the subway for Haymarket. Lots of Freedom Trail sites around there. We ate dinner @ Union Oyster House. Jon had both oysters and lobster en casserole. I had Lobster Newburgh. The disappointing Indian pudding must have been left over from last Thanksgiving.


We found a couple of colonists who wanted us to join them for an ale at the pub. Actually one suggested we could take his photograph for a beer but the other one said "Go ahead." Isn't Monday Patriots Day?
Jon was overjoyed that the Red Sox won finally. They have been having a miserable season so far. We saw lots of preparations for the Boston Marathon all over town.

Day Five--Day of Reckoning:

Dr. StrangeloveUnfortunately we leave Boston on Sunday night. Today was the day of reckoning-- the raison d'être for the trip--my presentation on "Dr. Strangelove." Enjoyed an excellent frittata for breakfast and then went back to room to practice my speech.


Was on a panel with a "Bourne Supremacy Trilogy" compared with the James Bond Films (only tie to the 60s that I could see) as well as a paper on racial stereotypes in from "Here to Eternity." The presenter on "All Presidents Men" (as well as the chair) didn't show up so I introduced everybody. Good solid panel but unfortunately the other two just read their papers instead of preparing a PowerPoint.


Went to Herb Gooch's panel this morning and totally enjoyed his lecture. Jon says only CLU professors know how to deliver interesting presentations---the rest just read from a manuscript.  Herb's was on "Lawrence of Arabia" as a tragic hero. It was brilliant. His fellow presenter was a German professor who talked about a documentary on religious hats found in Jerusalem.


We had dinner with the Gooches for the second time tonight. They were also at Lucca when we dined there on Tuesday night and sat at the very next table so we could chat. Funny thing, we rarely have time to get together in California. This was a great excuse to spend time with each other. Tomorrow we are driving out to Salem together after breakfast. The hotel is going to be a zoo tomorrow with everybody trying to get a room for the Marathon so we are leaving just in time.


Tonight we ate dinner together at SkipJack--great seafood. Chris had a spicy scampi pasta, Herb had a lobster roll, Jon had haddock and oysters again (aphrodisiac or not, enough is enough) and I had lobster bisque and a seafood Cobb salad. A couple rounds of drinks and a balmy night made for a nice walk home. SkipJacks is right across the street from the Old South Church. Chris said it's even better inside but we had to get home and pack.


Sharon was kind enough to send us a video and photo of Chloe and her friends hanging out. We both miss Chloe so much. We know she is having a great vacation but keep thinking about her-- how much she would enjoy our lobster or walking around Boston. She is our baby. No doubt about that.

The_Green_Hornet_1939_serialDay Six--Salem and Marblehead

Riding down on the elevator this morning I said, with appropriate amazement, "The Green Hornet is in this car!" The mother said, "my son is so pleased you recognized him." The father said, "That's because we are at a Popular Culture Convention."

 

 

 

 

 

We bid farewell to Boston and headed toward Salem.


It was so nice of Mother Nature to have all the trees and shrubs in bloom for our visit. I don't know enough about botany to identify all the flora but the colors went from white to pink to mauve to purple and to bright yellow. What a spectacular way to announce Spring.  We are heading to Salem, which is not only known for witches but also cherry trees.

 

Chris in Salem

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It took quite a while for Jon to get his bearings, but we eventually made our way into Salem proper. We all were expecting a small New England town like "Murder She Wrote" and this was a little city that was so spread out we totally missed the center of town and went all the way to Beverly, Massachussets (which is just across the bridge from Salem). We found a parking facility  near the Witch Museum and set out.

The museum presented a series of dioramas around the room.  Each lit up at the appropriate moment. The narrator (who was blessed with a rich baritone} gave the most accurate account of the witch trials we had ever heard.

There was also a second section of the museum that included the history of witches from The Wicked Witch of the West to practitioners of Wicca. One thousand Wiccans currently live in Salem but the population triples on Halloween. I wonder why?

Salem greenNext we headed across Washington Park where we must have entered a time warp.  Who are those funny looking people?


We finally made Jon happy by locating the Visitors Center. Wasn't really necessary because the Peabody Essex Museum was right behind it. There are supposedly 854,000 items arranged in collections by donors who were largely sea captains and collectors of antique furniture.

 
Museum chaise Museumpiano

There is an entire room just filled with those figureheads that protrude from  the prow of a ship. Beverly really liked the Chinese Moon bed from the early nineteenth century while Jon would have liked to own an automaton clock from mid-eighteenth century and an 1810 piano forte made in (of all places) Milton, Mass.   Come to think about it, Beverly wouldn't have minded having a Greek style chaise from the Georgian period in her boudoir.  Probably the most precious item was a 1647  book of maps called Theatricum Orbis Terarum. 

Because of a recommendation by Bob Morris, Jon and Beverly decided to check out Marblehead, Massachusetts before heading for Logan.  They thought they might get a bite to eat there but never could locate the center of town.  The church in Marblehead, however, is Mary Star of the Sea, and is the church where the funeral was held in "A Perfect Storm." Perfect Storm

After boarding the plane in Boston around 10:00 PM, Beverly fell asleep while Jon struggled to get comfortable. He was served cheese lasagna around midnight. He said he took catnaps off and on. When Beverly woke up, the plane were only 40 minutes from Heathrow. That was perfect for her.  Apparently for Jon, British Airways is not the most comfortable way to fly. 

Day Seven--Heathrow and Salisbury

Getting through passport control wasn't difficult especially since our agent was Peter O'Toole. Well, he certainly looked like him.


Our surly driver from Salisbury met us outside customs. He didn't offer to take our bags, offer any information during the 90-minute trip, and drove through fields of rapeseed (looks a lot like California mustard but is processed for the oil) like bat out of hell. Jon gave him a 10% tip. I can't wait to fill out the review.


B9149fb1c2ebdb135c85c695b62eb8f75largeOur room was not ready @ City Lodge, so we set off in search of sustenance. We apparently are staying in Salisbury's "entertainment district." The former church across the street is, no kidding, a sleazy night club called "The Chapel." We were really hungry and since there was no breakfast to speak of at City Lodge,  we walked up the street and discovered that The Red Lion Inn was serving elevensies in the lounge. Very English---you ate at little tables while you sat in overstuffed sofas and chairs. We ordered sandwiches and the waitress asked if we wanted chips. We said yes. Not only did we get potato chips on the plate with the sandwiches but also a huge order of fries, each. It was then we remembered that, in the UK, chips are called crisps and fries are called chips.  We overdosed on carbs that day. 

 

The Red Lion is quite ancient.  In fact, the original proprieter  added a wing for the draughtsman constructing the Salisbury Cathedral between 1280 and 1320.  We also noticed a skeleton organ clock in the lobby dated 1810. The lounge is apparently used by people on holiday as well as businessmen conducting deals in a genteel atmosphere.  It was heaven for people-watching.  We also found a Brazilian Coffee Shop next to a Cornish Pasty Shop but we were too full from lunch to try out the Cornish Pasty that Chris had recommended we taste if we got the chance.

Salisbury squreA friendly Salisbury duck greeted us as we left the Brazilian Coffee House. The big square down town is surrounded by either Italian restaurants or pizza places. We ended up having dinner @ the Cathedral Hotel. I had a beef pie with a filo dough crust and Jon had Yorkshire pudding with lamb. What really made the entrees were the special sauces: horseradish with the beef and a spicy mint sauce with the lamb. For dessert we tried Spotted Dick--a bread pudding with currents and a buttery custard sauce.

Day Eight--Stonehenge and Salisbury Cathedral

There's nothing better than having your own personal tour guide---especially when he is as knowledgeable and accommodating as Jim. We drove past various estates that boasted thatched roofs. Only rich people can afford thatching---it costs $50k to have it done and it has to be redone every ten years. One of the more eccentric aristocrats in the area is Lady Chichester. She owns a Bactrian camel named Therese and several llamas. We also passed by the estate of Gordon Sumner AKA "Sting."


We made our way to Woodhenge which was used in ceremonies to celebrate the winter solstice. We also viewed the perimeter Durrington Walls, which were located  in the middle of a field of sheep, which we assiduously avoided. There were also different shaped mounds, that supposedly held animal bones and human remains, and are still compeling scholars speculate on their purpose.


StonehengeStonehenge was no disappointment to us. Jim told us that some tourists expected something bigger but we were simply amazed. The stones changed color as we walked around them. Every few feet was another, more interesting Kodak moment. Jim provided audio guides that traced the origin of the monument  back between 3000 BC and 1600 BC.  Some of the rocks were from West Wales (150 miles away.). "How did they bring them to Stonehenge?" is the question.   The alignment at Stonehenge is to both the summer and winter solstices but its purpose is still a mystery. Beverly's theory is that tribes gathered together every year at midsummer to find marriage partners, trade and learn new skills. She may have been unduly influenced by Jean Auel.  Jim's theory is that it could have been a time for people to pay their respects to dead ancestors. We do know that there was a procession route from Avon River to site. Walking up the hill, Stonehenge would have loomed dramatically into view overhead, adding to the symbolism.


Our next stop was Old Sarum (which is a linguistic corruption of Salisbury) and an Iron Age hill fort. Our guide was Andy, an archeologist who told us he had been on a dig, where he unearthed the leg of a horse in a sunken granary storage area. What was it doing there? Apparently, according to Andy, it was a sacrifice of some sort to the grain gods. He told us that the chalk soil was what preserved the grain. As the grain tried to germinate, all the rot-inducing oxygen was sucked out of the hole. 


Sarum is the original home of the first two Salisbury cathedrals (1092 AD, 1100 AD) which the clergy moved primarily because they didn't like the military telling them what to do. Sarum is surrounded by a dry moat and supposedly never lost a siege. William the Conquerer built his castle there and listed Old Sarum in his Doomsday Book as Sarisburia. (Celtic for fortified place near a river). William the Conqueror also made his home at what is now the Louvre.  Coincidence?  We think not.


Salisbury CathedralA new cathedral was constructed in New Sarum or Salisbury in 1220. Materials for the new cathedral were recycled from Old Sarum. We had a great lunch in the refectory restaurant. Jon had fish pie and Beverly had roast pork. We also shared a rhubarb cheesecake for dessert. Susan was our guide for the cathedral floor. We got to see samples of all the building materials. Marble wasn't used but a type of limestone (that could be polished with Emory paper) was made from fossilized tiny snails. We also viewed a Medieval mechanical clock-- the world's oldest working clock (1386) that's powered by counter weights and rings bells instead of using a clock face. We also saw a square fountain that slowly flowed out of all four corners. The Trinity Chapel at the front of the Cathedral was beautifully reflected on the surface of the water.  We got to sit in the choir stalls (1236). Young boys and girls still train to be choristers today. The stained glass was spectacular and  representative of Gothic, Victorian and Edwardian periods.


Jon climbed to the bell level of the spire---which is Britain's tallest (404')  We also visited the Charter House and saw one of only four copies of the Magna Carta (1215). It was written in Latin and went far beyond Beverly and Jon's translation skills. Right before we went to Cathedral Hotel for dinner, it hailed. And the gang wan't even here. You don't have to laugh.  We enjoyed the meat-lovers platter for two: lamb chops, bangers, ribs, chicken wings, potato wedges, onion rings, garlic wedges, and salad.

Day Nine--London Town

The first train to London didn't leave until 11:21AM, so we had time for a leisurely breakfast @ the Cathedral Hotel. The trip took the same amount of time as the car we hired to get out to Salisbury but was much more comfortable.

London umbrella The Premier Inn @ County Hall is as efficient as possible.  The low price is due to  minimal staff. Your key card gets you on the elevator and turns on the electricity in your room. The computer in the lobby, however, doesn't always spit out a working key card. This we found out on the first "we-are-so-tired-we-could-drop" day. We also opted for the breakfast every morning--- great deal and restaurant is on site and opens @ 6:30 am. We have to be out front of Marriott at other end of block at 7:30 AM for the "Magic of London" Tour mañana.


Big BenWe decided we weren't too tired to see the entire city from the vantage of the London Eye, a giant Ferris wheel with 32 enclosed glass pods that held 20 people. The frame is 443 ft in circumference. It has been open since 2000. The view was spectacular despite the rain. Jon didn't have any trouble with his usual fear of heights and most people took turns in front of window for picture-taking. The wait to get on was about 20 minutes--so not worth extra money for fast-track.


Although it was raining off and on, we also decided to visit the London Aquarium. London AquariumIt is the biggest in Europe and well worth the price of admission. There are three very cool aspects to the design. First, you walk over the top of the aquarium to get in--the glass bridge tends to freak out little kids but we loved it. Second, you start out at floor -2. You don't realize it, but you are walking on a very slight incline and eventually the walk spirals up to the first floor. Third, the sea life is grouped by geographical origin. The best tank held an Easter Island statue with sharks and rays circling around.
Beverly thought the lion fish, sea horse and turtles were most ready for their close-ups.  Her new camera app really provides fantastic photos. We ended up dining at a first rate Italian restaurant called Locale. Beverly's pasta was freshly made and the meatballs were Mama Mia good. Jon also enjoyed his lasagna. It was right across the street from the hotel.

Day Ten:  The Magic of London:

Tower BridgeThis was the earliest we've had to rise during this trip. In fact it was still dark when we opened the curtains, which, the night before, held a magical view of the London Eye. 


On the bus, we met a family from Brockton (Jon's old home town) that had a grandma with bad knees just like Beverly. Allyne's only a couple years older than Beverly but still works 3 days a week developing housing programs for the city of Boston.

 

We rode to Victoria Station where we met our guide Barry and headed for the Thames where we boarded a boat to travel to the Tower of London--which is located directly behind the Tower Bridge.  The London Bridge of nursery rhyme fame is gone.  Well, it still exists but it is now located at Lake Havesu, California.

Beefeater

On the grounds of the Tower, we were introduced to our own Beefeater or Yeoman Warder. To obtain this position, one must serve 22 years in Her Majesty's service, not be convicted of a crime, and, as our guy confessed, "It doesn't hurt if you are good-looking." He told us about all the former queens who were beheaded, the legend of the ravens (if the six left leave, the tower will fall down) and also showed us England's crown jewels.

 

The first room was filled with swords and armor. The next held a gold scepter for every monarch.  Beverly got busted (nicely) for taking a picture. The tiny crown worn by Victoria was so different from all the others, Beverly was compelled to ask about it. Apparently after Albert died, Victoria refused to wear her crown which was fashioned to duplicate her father's. She felt it inappropriate so she asked Parliament to allow her to wear a child sized crown on top of her mourning veils. The crown might be small but it contains 1,187 diamonds. We were then given time on our own. Jon and Beverly found another canon in addition to the three out front (captured from Napoleon). This one was held up with a white terrier and rode in a flower cart. The canon supposedly belonged to the Knights Templar. Jon also found a whimsical dragon that had been made out of armor, helmets, pistols, and swords.


Buckingham PalaceNext we headed toward the mall and stopped @ Buckingham Palace.  Unfortuntely we were caught in the middle of a pounding rain storm. There is no changing of the guard when it is raining, but we were invited to come back another day to see it.  The crowds, apparently, don't really allow much of a view anyway.  We didn't go into the palace but walked around the perimeter, where we saw mounted royal guards. They had apparently come from the celebrated Horse Guards station.

 

Apparently, back in the day,  Queen Victoria was inspecting the horse guards (that really had nothing to guard since she moved to Windsor Castle) and she found them drunk. If fact, as one saluted her, he was so inebriated that he fell off his horse. She became so incensed that she decreed that two horse guards would not only serve for 100 more years but every day at  4:00 PM, they had to report on their sobriety.  You can get your picture taken with the ones that are on duty  but the guide warned us that the horses love to kick tourists.  We had little snack at a pub called The Clarence near Trafalgar Square that had been mentioned in one of Beverly's guidebooks. The mac and cheese was to die for--- country cheddar with a hint of mustard.  Both Beverly and Jon wished we could have spent more time there but this was a nine-hour tour and everybody had to stay on schedule, damn it.

 

Next was St Paul's Cathedral, created by Christopher Wren in 1673. He designed a church with a dome which officials deemed too Catholic but he got the King to intervene and disregard their censure. We heard the 1695 organ once played by Mendelssohn and visited the tombs of Lord Nelson, Lord Wellington and Samuel Johnson. Jon tested the unique acoustics of the Whispering Gallery.


HarroldsLast, we rode to Knightsbridge, where we took the escalator to the 4th floor of Harrods and entered The Georgian Restaurant. We enjoyed a Victorian High Tea with a flute of champagne, five finger sandwiches, two scones and six sweets. We got to talk to Allyne's (Grandma) family (daughter, son-in-law and two grandsons). Jon especially admired the copper ceiling in one of the lifts. Everything in this world famous department store is posh. The window displays are works of art in themselves and we couldn't find any item marked less than €9.95 or around $16. We could hardly walk, but managed to waddle over to Pet Kingdom to look at outfits for Chloe. Unfortunately for Chloe, all the selections were out of her price range. 

It wasn't easy to get photos out of the bus windows but we all tried. The coolest shot was to put Big Ben in the center of the Eye.  We were told that at Kings Cross train station you can get your picture taken pushing a luggage cart into No. 9 3/4 of Harry Potter fame.

There are hundreds of bronze statues in London including our very own Abraham Lincoln. The best story, however, is about the statue of Winston Churchill. He didn't want birds pooping on his head, so be declined to pose for his bronze. After he died, however, one was cast anyway, capturing him as a busy Prime Minister--his long coat swirling around him. The artist supposedly wired the head with electricity so birds who try to land and poop on his head get the shock of a lifetime.

Westminister Abbey

Day Eleven--Greenwich and Stalkers

Two Observations: 1) The only way Beverly can keep track of the days on this trip is with her daily pill dispenser.  2) Cab rides in London are usually more costly than anywhere else because you sit for hours in unbelievable traffic, all while the meter keeps clicking away.  The photo to the left is Westminister Abbey, where anyone, who is anyone, is buried.  We had no trouble catching a snaphot during one of those expensive taxi rides.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Women's bridgeWe decided to take it easy today, so instead of the British Museum, Jon got tickets on a boat trip to Greenwich and back. It was a rainy day but we were near a window so we got the wind in our faces but no raindrops were falling on our heads. Both Jon and I are never so happy as when we are on the water.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greenich tripWe got a view of the newest and tallest building in London called the Shard of Glass. 

After London Bridge, the shoreline becomes mostly industrial with wharf after empty wharf largely repurposed as residential. Jon wondered why residents didn't berth their boats in front of their condos but either it's too dangerous (sail boats and recreational craft smashing into docks during bad weather) or these folks don't waste money on their own boats.

One of the empty wharves was directly in front of the Mayflower Church, so named because that is where the pilgrims departed for America in 1620.

Before we pulled into the dock at Greenwich, we were to look up on a hillside to the right for a black dome. It is the Greenwich Observatory on the Prime Meridian or 0 degrees longitude.

Cuttysark

Jon and Beverly recalled that they have also stood at the equator (Ecuador) which is 0 degrees latitude. Greenwich is also home to the clipper ship SS Cuttysark, which most people recognize as the logo for a famous brand of scotch. On the way back, we got a better look at Cleopatra's Needle -- a gift from the head of Egypt that was 3500 years old. We also got up close and personal with the clock tower where the bell Big Ben is housed.


Drew Stalker, Beverly's godson, invited us out to his home near Wimbledon to meet his family and have dinner. The last time we saw each other was Trevor's wedding.  We rode out on the train---Beverly had quite an adventure with an amorous drunk at the Waterloo station (even though she told the guy she had a cane and knew how to use it)--and Drew met us at the station.  It was a 10-minute walk to his house, but with Beverly's knees, it became more like 20 minutes. 

Photo We were shown into the livingroom while Drew and Ashley prepared dinner.  Their children, Chloe and Ethan were amazing--so self assured (Chloe is learning tennis at Wimbledon) and generous (Ethan offered us cheerios and milk from his tippy cup).  We are so proud of Drew.  He has illustrated a children's book of poetry called "The Rock and Roll Band In My Armpit."  The poems were hysterical and Drew's pictures were appropriately whimsical.  Drew also has done some clever, ironic postcards of London that should be great sellers when he markets them.  Ashley is a very talented photographer (Chloe is her favorite model) and wonderful homemaker.  For dinner, Drew made us a special potato tortilla he discovered when he spent his two year mission in Spain.  We also devoured toasted meat and cheese sanwiches and all sorts of tapas.  It was great fun sharing travel stories with this wonderful family.  The visit was the highlight of our time in England.

Paris cyclesDay Twelve--We Take Paris

After a great breakfast at the County Hall Premier Inn, we headed for the St. Pancras Train Station to board the Eurostar for Paris.  It's only a 2.5 hour trip--thanks to the chunnel---but is economical as well as relaxing (compared to the plane).  We were served an unexpected second breakfast, courtesy of our first class tickets. 6a00d8341c8f3e53ef0168ea9b32b5970c-580wiThe clever Brits had the  breakfast trays magnetized to avoid sliding off the convenient table that was positioned between us. This morning also commemorated the occasion of our first chocolate croissant outside of the US.

After a short taxi ride to Le Bristol, we were greeted warmly by our hostess Stephanie. She had our luggage carried to our room on the fourth floor with a wonderful view of rue du Faubourg Saint Honore. Jon declined having a maid unpack our bags.  Neither of the two balconies looked directly out onto the Arche de Triomphe, as Beverly had led the readers of the  column---she wrote in Paris---to believe.  Call it a bit of poetic license taken since a couple of tall buildings blocked the view of the arch but you could see the very top of the Effiel Tower from both balconies as well as the pool.  Stephanie assured Beverly that she would take Beverly's little secret to her grave.

Beverly took a badly needed swim in the gorgeous hotel pool where she made the acquaintance of Harvey Rubin, a fellow auction "winner" from La Jolla.  Jon and Beverly made the minimum bid on the two-night stay at Le Bristol at an fund-raiser for the Boys and Girls Club in Port Hueneme and Oxnard.  Jon just wanted to get the bidding going but he was the only bid so we "won."

Both Beverly and Jon cleaned up beautifully  with all the designer shampoos and conditionersk provided by the hotel.  We decided that rich people never have to contend with travel sweat.  Beverly shook the wrinkles from her little black dress and Jon put on a tie and white shirt.   Since we had failed to make reservations for the restaurant (only 20 tables), we ended up eating and drinking in Le Bar.  The tab for one smoked salmon appetizer, a caesar salad with chicken, an octapus ravioli plate and four glasses of wine was 260 Euro.  Good thing that Beverly and Jon couldn't get into the restaurant.  They couldn't have afforded a full dinner. Harvey said he and his wife enjoyed a seven course, three-hour meal at the restaurant. Although he had  "won" a three-day stay at Le Bristol, he was obviously not in the same tax bracket as Jon and Beverly. 

Day Thirteen--Land, Sea and Air

There are 22 bridges in Paris. The first we crossed was Pont Neuf, where, during the Seventeenth Century, it was said  "you are apt to meet a monk, a loose woman, and a white horse." We were prepared to seize the day, however, having dined at the Hotel Bristol Restaurant on chocolate croissants and Eggs Benedict with caviar.  Thank God, Breakfast was included with our stay.  

Eiffel towerThe first part of our five-hour Paris Tour was via bus and we checked out all the highlights including the Arc de Triomphe, the mile-long Louvre, the Musee D'Orsay, the Church of the Madeleine, the Champs Élysées, the Jardin des Tuileries, the Opera House and ended up at the Eiffel Tower, where we enjoyed panoramic views of the city from each direction.

Jon had a couple of bad moments on the way up on the elevator, but he said he enjoyed the magnificent vistas as well.

Beverly recommends against visiting la sale de bain on the second level. There was only a single door to both (gender) toilets but the problem was the line to the woman's loo went out the door, so men had to push past women to get in. Next, both the entrance and exit to the female toilet was the same, and was filled up with a queue of women who had to pee--and I mean, right now. Further, there were only four stalls and only enough room for the women who were washing their hands; not the women who were trying to enter or exit the stalls. Add to that, a group of women on a VIP tour, who pushed to the front of the line, and you have a recipe for disaster.

After descending back to earth with an empty bladder, we had quite a walk to the dock where the boat would take us up and down the Seine. The highlights of that trip were Notre Dame and the Wishing Bridge. Beverly wished for new knees.

Tables-avec-banquette-du-restaurant-Chez-FrancisWe had supper @ Cafe Francais, which looks, according to Jon, like an old school French whore house--all red velvet, gold mirrors and gaslights. We hoped Le Bristol staff wouldn't smell the hamburger and fries on our breath.  BTW, they was the best hamburgers either Jon or Beverly ever tasted. The wine was also pretty good-- we had three glasses each. When we got back, Beverly did another workout in the pool.

It will be with great sadness that we will abandon all the pampering, but we are looking forward to walking around the Latin Quarter and not feeling pressured to spend money that we don't really have.

The French Presidential Election was today and Jon was glued to the TV.  Eighty percent of the electorate showed up to vote! 

Day 13--Going Latin

Alas, we had to check out today.  Le Bristol was the most elegant, service- oriented, outrageously expensive hotel frequented by either Jon or Beverly. Fresh white roses adorned Beverly's vanity table. There was a soft terrycloth robe with matching slippers for each of us. Our clothes were hung up and there were new bottles of the most amazing shampoo/conditioner/shower gel/moisturizing lotion in the shower, in the bath and at the pool, just begging to be slipped into a suitcase. Neither Jon or Beverly ever felt so soft and clean. We went to breakfast deciding we were going to order something really special.

Golden eggSpecial it was. Beverly's yogurt (which had a long unmemorable French name) was unbelievable as were her poached eggs, chocolate croissants and bacon. Jon, however, hit the jackpot with his soft boiled egg. First of all it had gold leaf on top. The whites were whipped with maple syrup,  the yolk was absolutely perfect, and the whole thing was served with little toasted bread sticks.  Jon raved so much he was offered another (which would have cost anyone else $60).


Stephanie helped us check out. We were only billed for the extraordinary dinner on Saturday night.  Our luggage and a taxi simultaneously appeared, and we found ourselves @ Hotel du Vieux de Paris in the Latin Quarter. 

VieuxThe hotel used to be named "The Beat Hotel" during the 50s and was frequented by Allen Ginsberg, Peter Orlafsky, and William S Burroughs.

Madame Odillard, charming as all get out, was sorry to inform us that there were still guests in our room but asked if we would we like to see another.  It was upstairs but Madame now has a lift, which she calls her "love machine"---gives a whole new meaning to "calling the elevator."  After serving us coffee in the parlor, Beverly was able to read and relax, while Jon walked 2.5 miles to the Musee des egouts de Paris (the Sewer Museum). When Madame asked "Pourquoi?" did Jon want to go there, Beverly answered "Parce qu'il est un homme."  Madame laughed, and not at Beverly's French.  In fact, Madame inspired Beverly to try to recall her little vocabulary flash cards from high school.  The irony is that while Beverly only took two years of high school French, she ended up teaching third year French at Lincoln High School in San Diego.   She was working as a teaching assistant---but when the third year French teacher at the all-black high school failed to show up in September. the principle asked Beverly to teach the 8 students in third year French.  Beverly manged to stay just one chapter ahead each week.

Beverly wanted to take a couple of paragraphs to highlight Relais Hotel Vieux Paris. Not only was Madame Odillard so warm and welcoming when we arrived, we immediately felt at home.  Her 20-year old manager Apeline helped confirm our tours and answered all our questions. The first thing that we learned is that the original walls date back to 1380.


During the 50s, the Relais Hotel Vieux Paris was known as The Beat Hotel because, like Greenwich Village, the area from St Germaine to the Seine was populated by artists, writers and college students (Sorbonne, University of Paris, and L'Ecole des Beaux Artes) because it was relatively cheap.  A number of what we now call homeless and panhandlers also lived in the area .

All the narrow neighboring streets also housed small businesses such as bookshops, antiques-sellers, art galleries, radical publishers and cafes with fixed price menus for three courses. Much remains the same today.  The only big difference is the addition of souvenir shops and tourist trap restaurants that promise French cooking but simply pour bernaise sauce on cheap cuts of meat, take vegetables from a can, and charge 18 euros for the meal.


The address of Hotel View Paris is 9, rue Git Le Coeur. During the 13th Century, the street was a medieval lane. Superior-room Even now, it is still too small for any vehicle save the most diminuitive of taxis.

There are two stories about the derivation of "git le coeur."  The first maintains the street name is a corruption of Gilles Le Queux while the second refers to the mistress of Henry IV who resided there. The King always called the street "ici git mon coeur." ("Here lies my heart"). Beverly prefers the latter.


The original hotel was built during the 16th Century, and the very small Madame Racheau was the proprietor and concierge. She loved artists but not when they tried to sneak out without paying or when they used gas rings to cook  food which she had forbidden. It was said she would jump down on them from her perch on a wine cask, waving her tiny arms and braying like a donkey.


The bathrooms were chiottes (a hole in the floor with grooves to place one's feet) and newspaper served as toilet tissue. She carved out 42 rooms where there are now 19.   Madame Racheau only changed the bed linens once a month. The hotel was rated @ 13th level (which is bottom of ratings -- right before being condemned).


According to the accounts Madame provided, the air, during that time, stank of stale cooking odors and urine. The guests were, in a word, colorful. One was an artist who filled his room with straw. Another was a photographer who refused to speak for 2 years. There was a giant from French Guyana who could barely fit through the doors and a Swiss painter everybody called Jesus Christ because of his long hair, flowing robes and sandals.  He couldn't afford canvas, so he painted on the walls.


ToulouseAmong the beatniks, ee cummings, who was carousing with Gilbert Seldes and John Dos Passos in 1923, was arrested at 3:00AM for urinating on the outside wall of the hotel.

Madame said that Barry Humphreys has been coming to the hotel for decades and that she really enjoyed talking to him.  She said she didn't know who he really was until some tourists identified him as Dame Edith, the famous Australian cross-dressing satirist, who loves to make fun of the Queen, as only Aussies can.

When Jon returned, we headed out for a walk, and discovered the local Bistro des Augustines. We stayed for a couple of glasses of wine and some wonderful French people-watching.


Restaurants don't open until seven (was that a shock) so we walked in the other direction and found Cafe Latin, where we both enjoyed the French onion soup. Jon had faux filet de boeuf and Beverly ordered Feuillete du Saumon a la champignones. The Creme Brûlée was so light and fluffy, we had to compliment the chef. The waiter admitted he had whipped it up himself, and his secret was using powdered sugar for the crusty topping. So magnifique! Since it rained all day, we said a little prayer for sun tomorrow to accompany our visit to the D'Orsay.

Day Fifteen--La Musee d'Orsay

Dorsay ceilingThe ratio of 8 tourists to 1 guide is just about perfect. We also had Phoebe (who was training to be a guide) who devoted herself to getting Beverly and Jon on the right lift while the others climbed the stairs. The French guide (who sometimes made interesting word choices in English) really knew impressionist art. We learned so much and we both had a pretty good knowledge of impressionism to start with. The history of the building itself was worth mentioning.  It  had served as a train station (gare) during the nineteenth century. The architecture ((Victor Laloux) of the building is called Beaux-Artes. It is appropriate that the art chosen for the D'Orsay should reflect the fall of the old regime (Beaux-Artes) when artists could finally exhibit their work without being subject to the narrowmindedness of the academy. (The Institute of France).

 

 

We learned that Thomas Couture already caused a sensation with his (1847) "Romans of the Decadence" and that Realism and Naturalism became the norm largely because of the invention of photography.

Manet.
We could see why Edward Manet broke ground with his nude in  "Le Dejeuner sur l'herbe" in 1863 and we fell in love with his "Olympia," which Beverly captured on film when the guard wasn't looking. Note that the black ribbon around Olympia's neck, which symbolized her occupation as a prostitute and the inclusion of a black cat as a reference to the cabaret that preceeded the Moulin Rouge as all the rage in Paris.

 

 

 

We also learned that Claude Monet was drawn to painting in the open air as an alternative way to look at nature and that he gave a painting to his landlady in lieu of rent. She stored it in the basement where water damaged the canvass in two places, hence the two conjoined paintings of the picnic-goers.

 

 

We also saw many favorite paintings including  "Jane Avril at Moulin Rouge" by Toulouse-Laurec, a wonderful crowd scene by by Paul Gauguin, "Arles" by Vincent Van Gogh, "Waterlilies in Giverny" by Claude Monet, and "Woman With A Coffeepot" by Paul Cezanne. The question by the guide to demonstrate how Cezanne makes the transition between impressionism and cubism was : Is the woman standing or sitting? Cezanne

 

 

We walked around St Michael's Square looking for a place to grab a couple of glasses of wine, while we watched it pleut (rain). We especially wanted to get over to Notre Dame since we visit the Louvre tomorrow. We had seen Notre Dame from the river side. The rose window in front is spectacular. You will be pleased to learn that we found no evidence of either a hunchback or Esmerelda.

The fountain at St. Michel Square, of course, is the landmark for the square and depicts the archangel slaying the devil. Notre Dame

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We ended up dining at Maison Blanc due to a very aggressive waiter who was the first (of two) arrogant Parisiennes we met. Apparently he didn't like Beverly because she didn't try hard enough to parle francais. It was not a very impressive meal although the onion soup was pretty good. The meat was over-cooked, no bread arrived at the table, and the beans were canned. The proprietor was definitely not interested in reaping lots of repeat business.

Day Sixteen--Le Louvre

LouvreEveryone wants to see the Mona Lisa at the Louvre. It is smaller than most people realize and now, thanks to a Russian lunatic, behind glass, where it doesn't make for a very good photograph. Still the face is haunting and the eyes follow you across the room. Leonardo da Vinci only painted a dozen or so oils and the Louvre and Versailles Palace have most of them.


What was really astounding to us is that when people pushed their way to the front, instead of taking a photo of the world's most beautiful and famous painting, they, themselves, pose in front of the painting. The younger ones do that stupid leap in the air that has now replaced smiling with young people. What is this world coming to?

 

We learned the subject of the Mona Lisa is probably Lisa Gherardini, wife of a Florentine noble by the name of Francesco di Bartolommeo di Zanoli de Giacondo. Beverly wonders what da Vinci called him for short. Since Leonardo never considered the painting finished, he never allowed Francesco to take delivery.  Instead Leonardo took it to France with him, where he (da Vinci) died in 1519. Leonardo was the first Renaissance man: painter, sculptor, architect, engineer, musician, poet, philosopher, astronomer, anatomist, geologist, and botanist. His painting technique was unique in that it involved brushing layer after layer of paint on the canvas. The Mona Lisa alone took 5 years.

 

Louvre guide

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our guide was a scatterbrained narcissist.   He claimed to have been a guide for 20 years but provided no more information than the guidebooks.  Even worse was the fact that he refused to carry an identifying sign so we often lost him as he barreled full speed ahead to the next work of art. That's okay; we took care of each other. There were only six of us--one couple from Honolulu and the other from Long Beach. With such a small group, it should have been a pleasure for him, but he was presumably pissed off that there would be fewer dollars in tips. He did take us to the Mona Lisa but the rest was all paintings he liked, not what was advertised by the tour company.

 

VimeerWe did, however, get to skip the line, and to stay afterwards for as long as we wanted, although after 4 hours of walking the long distances from one work of art to nother, everybody wanted to get the hell out of there--vite. We got lost several times, so I got to see my favorites, the Johannes Vermeers several times. The Louvre has both "The Lacemaker" and "The Astronomer."


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Louvre began as a medieval fortress built by Philippe Auguste in the late 12th Century. France had to wait until the rein of Francis I in 15th Century before the abandoned military keep would be transformed into a royal residence. Other kings would eventually restore and add on to what would  become the Louvre.

 

Louvre ceiling 2Visitors were asked to look up to see decorated ceilings and tapestries that resemble paintings. Both Napoleons I and III had resided in highly gilted splendor in these rooms. In the late 19th Century, however, the purpose of the refurbishments was no longer to glorify the monarchy but to enhance the display of a growing collection of artworks, royal furnishings, and crown jewels. President Francois Mitterand would add the glass pyramid in 1981.

 

Sculptures are, by definition, three-dimensional art. All of us have our favorite sides to a full-length sculpture. For example, Beverly loves to look at Michelangelo's David from the rear. There were big crowds around "Venus de Milo" and "Winged Victory." It is so tempting to touch the marble but loud annoying alarms go off if one does.


God of musicThe hanging man sculpture, which rather resembles Christ, is a demi-god whose name Beverly has forgotten.  He was the one who was punished for bringing music to human beings. We saw rooms and rooms filled with Greek sculptures.  These pieces have not been sculpted by Frenchmen but were acquired (the guide refused to use the word "stolen") as the spoils of war. Greece is still asking for their return.

 

Francis of AssisiSo many paintings caught Beverly's eye and she remembers in particular, one by Rimini that was the first to employ lapis lazuli instead of gold.  Giotto was the first to  show action in his painting of St Francis of Assisi receiving the stigmata. Many of the religious paintings serve as wall-sized "Biblical comic books" for the priest to employ to  involve his parishioners in the sermons.   So many of these paintings reminded Beverly of the work of her friend, John Auguste Swanson.

Giuseppe Arcimboldo's "The Four Seasons" was amusing because the artist poked fun at various European monarchs by constructing their faces out of fruits and vegetables.  When you look at the painting from a distance, it appears to be a normal portrait.  It is only up close that you can see the satire.

 

After we left the Louvre, we saw and heard a street show behind a cyclone fence.  There were four stages which were outfitted to resemble  "cages." The two we saw featured dancers costumed as ballerinas and as 18th Century French courtiers with white powdered wigs. We had planned on going to the restaurant nearby, but the music was TOO LOUD so we must be TOO OLD.

We went to a cafe for a glass of wine while we waited until 7:30, when La Petite Machon, which had been featured in Beverly's guidebook, opened its doors. The food, cuisine of Lyon, was amazing.  For the first course, Jon enjoyed Pea and Carrot potage, while Beverly ate a potato blini with crayfish. For a main, Beverly  ordered Coque a St Germaine, which she assumed was some kind of fowl.  The coque turned out to be scallops in a lobster sauce served in clam shells on a bed of salt. Jon didn't see the salt and laid a piece of his roasted pork, apple and potato on the salt. Merde. Beverly will be retaining water for weeks. For dessert, we shared gateau avec caramel and Grand Marnier.

Days 17, 18, 19--Show me the Way to Go Home

LuncheonThe last four days bring to mind the words of Jackie Gleason to his orchestra leader Ray Block: "Let's have a little travelin' music, Ray."


As we reminisce about the last three weeks, it's the people we met that come to mind first, followed closely by all the delicious dishes.  Apparently calories don't count with French food.  Beverly found herself 4 lbs thinner!

Had our last breakfast at Vieux, and then headed for Gare Nord where we caught the Eurostar for London.  Spent the night at another Premier Inn in Kensington, relished their usual great breakfast, and then headed out to Heathrow, where Jon bought Beverly three bottles of Chloe at the duty free shop.  The perfume reminded her of the wall-sized mural of Napoleon I crowning Josephine at the Louvre. Theirs was quite a love affair.  Just before he was about to return from a campaign, Napoleon would send Josephine a message. It was always the same. "Don't bathe." Beverly, however, loves to smell nice, and Chloe has been her perfume for the last 20 years. 

We were offered £1200 to take a later flight, but Beverly just wanted to go home. She's almost out of Tramadol and the doctor's prediction is coming true. She is having to pay for all the punishment she inflicted on her poor arthritic knees.

BostonWe flew into Logan (Boston} where Jon had booked  a room with a spectacular view at the Hilton. When we did the Route 66 tour two summers ago, we always regretted that we rushed the end--trying to get home as soon as possible when what we really needed was to travel at  a leisurely pace, taking an extra day or two, in order to decompress.  This time Jon wanted to make sure he did it up right.

Our seats on the flights from Logan to Dulles to LAX were in first class, which really made the 8 hours bearable.  In fact, Jon even had a limo pick us up at the airport. What he didn't know was that it was going to be a stretch limo and the driver drove along the coast highway for a wonderful view of the Pacific.  We could have had champagne but we had more than enough drinks (bloody marys) in first class as well as a wonderful pasta dish for lunch.

BootsWe found Chloe still remembered us, and after catching up with her news, we went to bed.  Jon enjoyed a Red Sox game while Beverly slept. She slept for 13 hours---some kind of record---and was finally ready to unpack and give the washer a number of challenging loads the next day.


Jon and I decided that if we would have to pick one photo to symbolize the entire trip it would either be an umbrella or rain boots.  Since Beverly's are psychadelic as well as watertight, here they are.


Final thoughts on travel: You know your trip has been long enough if you start dreaming about sleeping in your own bed and you have to sit on your suitcase to get it to zip up.

Both were true for us.

 

 

April 29, 2012 in Boston/London/Paris | Permalink | Comments (0)

BIDEN'S GAFFE-PRONE REPUTATION REMAINS INTACT



BidenPublished in the Wednesday, March 28, 2012 edition of the Ventura County Star

Nobody ever accused Joe Biden of understatement. On March 23, 2010, as President Barack Obama affixed his signature to his hard-won health care law, the vice president gushed, "This is a big (expletive deleted) deal!"

Nobody ever accused Joe Biden of taking care to get it right, either, for that matter. The vice president's political gaffes and red-faced moments are legend.

Consider Jan. 20, 2009, when Biden took a stroll down short-term memory lane at the Obama Staff Ball. He was waxing philosophical about the swearing-in ceremony earlier that day. "Jill and I had the great honor," he informed the crowd, "of standing on that stage, looking across at one of the great justices, Justice Stewart."

Nobody at the dance recognized the name Justice Stewart, but this Obama administration-friendly crowd was not given to correcting — ala an unforgiving schoolmarm — a spanking-new vice president. Perhaps Mrs. Biden quietly whispered the correct name in her hubby's ear — leaving her rap on the knuckles for later.

Presumably, however, Justice John Paul Stevens qualifies as just as "great" as Justice Potter Stewart who met his maker in 1985.

Consider Biden's interview with Katie Couric on Sept. 22, 2008, as Biden pontificated, "When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn't just talk about the, you know, the princes of greed. He said, 'Look, here's what happened.' "

Not only was Herbert Hoover, not FDR, president in 1929, but television was still in the experimental stage.

Just last week, at a thousand-dollar-a-head fundraiser in New Jersey, with only 140 in attendance, Biden did it again. In hailing Obama's order to send Navy SEALS into Osama bin Laden's lair to take out the architect of 9/11, Biden reportedly said, "You can go back 500 years. You cannot find a more audacious plan."

The most audacious plan in half a millennium? Most folks would beg to differ.

For Ed Beakley of Project White Horse, a more audacious plan was Gen. George Washington's decision to attack Trenton on the morning after Christmas 1776 via "a night march of impossible proportions."

The crossing, memorably captured on canvas by Emanuel Leutze, "couples," according to Beakley, "not only audaciousness but also the greatest risk. For me, it is the single most compelling and important moment — without even a close second — in American history, and possibly for the idea of freedom as the world now knows it."

The 10 picks for more audacious plans nominated by Tim Mak of Politico.com included D-Day, Napoleon's invasion of Russia, the raid on Entebbe, the Spanish Armada plan to overthrow Queen Elizabeth, MacArthur's landing at Inchon, Operation Eagle Claw's rescue of 50 U.S. Hostages in Tehran, the capture of Adolf Eichman in Buenos Aires, the Civil War's Pickett's Charge, the landing at Gallipoli and the raid at Cabanatuan to liberate 500 Allied prisoners of war.

Mary Ripley, editor of the Naval Institute blog  and daughter of John Ripley (the bridge at Don Ha) considerably upped the ante by inviting nominations for the top 500 more audacious plans.

Among the hundreds already submitted were the charge of the Light brigade, the attack on Pearl Harbor, every single mission of the U.S. space program and (sad to say, but it qualifies) the Twin Towers attack on 9/11.

Biden, unaware that he'd already said enough, added, "Do any one of you have a doubt that if that raid failed, that this guy would be a one-term president? This guy is willing to do the right thing and risk losing."

In a futile stab at damage control, White House spokesman Jay Carney characterized Biden's remarks as merely highlighting the difficult and courageous decision made by the commander in chief.

Not so fast, gentlemen. First, the raid was risk-free for Obama. If it had failed, the press would have remained out of the loop — in the interests of national security. Second, the courage to issue a green light in the White House situation room is nowhere near the courage exhibited by the SEAL team in Pakistan. Third, touting bin Laden's demise during a presidential campaign, not to put too fine a point on it, smacks of crassness.

An unsigned Washington Times editorial, "Obama's Stolen Valor," points out, "the more the White House brags about the bin Laden raid, the more it is diminished."

On Sept. 10, 2008, Biden told a town hall meeting in Nashua, N.H., "Hillary Rodham Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Quite frankly, (she) might have been a better pick than me."

Not only was Biden absolutely correct in his aforementioned observation, but he even managed to sneak in a little understatement as well. Now, that's what I call "audacious."

March 27, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Barack Obama, Ed Beakley, Emanuel Leutze, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Gen. George Washington, Herbert Hoover, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Joe Biden, Justice Paul Stevens, Justice Potter Stewart, Mary Ripley, Naval Institute, Navy SEALS, Osama bin Laden, Politico.com, Project White Horse, Tim Mak

SEARCH GOES ON FOR A PALATABLE GOP CANDIDATE

Is_it_too_late_to_clone_ronald_reagan_tshirt-p235349278342651301z7tqq_400Published in the March 14, 2012 edition of the Ventura County Star

Republicans seem to be in a funk these days. At a time when the GOP should be energized at the prospect of ousting a president who hasn't lived up to the hype, they are popping anti-depressants and moaning about cutting losses.

No less a conservative authority than George Will has been instructing them to turn from the goal of beating President Obama to "making sure Republicans wield all the gavels in Congress in 2013."

He assumes that "if Republicans do, their committee majorities will serve as fine-mesh filters, removing President Obama's initiatives from the stream of legislation. Then Republicans can concentrate on what should be the essential conservative project of restoring something like constitutional equipoise between the legislative and executive branches."

While the lengthy primary process has proved a dispiriting factor to us all, the focus of the mainstream media on the horse race aspect — who is ahead in the polls and who has the war chest still flush with cash or has tied himself to the most moneyed Super PAC — certainly hasn't helped, either.

Even amateur pundits now seem determined to get into the act. The latest Rasmussen national telephone survey found that a plurality, namely 43 percent of all voters, believe it would be better for the GOP if a brand-new candidate threw his or her chapeau into the ring.

So what do Republicans believe? A recent Gallup poll reports that a whopping 64 percent of likely GOP voters would rather be casting a ballot for somebody other than Mitt Romney. Furthermore, Rick Santorum (24 percent), Newt Gingrich (14 percent) and "other" (3 percent), have all evidenced growth spurts of late.

So what does this all mean? First, Republicans haven't found their "man on the white horse" — the ideal candidate who can lead them to victory come November. It's as if the Republican voter is some sort of Goldilocks complaining, "Santorum is too conservative, Romney is not conservative enough, and Gingrich is — even without his lack-of-ethics baggage — too Gingrich."

Second, Republicans seem determined to operate out of fear. If you don't believe me, just check out some of the scorched earth propaganda that passes for political mailers, television ads and robo-calls in states cursed with early primaries.

On the other hand, it was the promise of hope and change that got President Obama elected. In the midst of a financial crisis, it worked like a charm. The $1 billion question is "Will it work again?"

The latest Rasmussen polls state, in a hypothetical 2012 match up, Romney leads Obama by five points. That's big news since it coincides with the possibility that Obama's job approval ratings are slipping into a downward death spiral.

Perceptions of Obama's leadership have definitely declined since his State of the Union address in January. In fact, for a president seeking re-election during the last two decades, his approval ratings qualify as a historic low.

So who might qualify as the ideal candidate?

It would have to be somebody who exudes charisma. While not every voter can define the word, he or she sure knows when it's not there. Most Republicans fail to perceive credibility, transparency or trustworthiness in any of the frontrunners.

Furthermore, the ideal candidate must be able to offer pragmatic solutions to America's problems — not some nebulous "pie in the sky" way out that seems to shape-shift into whatever polls predict a particular target audience wants to hear — but a handful of sensible, no-nonsense plans that can be plainly understood by the average American.

For example, does the American voter really want the government to stick it to the wealthy — according to Rasmussen, 52 percent favor candidates who would raise taxes on the rich — or are they actually demanding a tax system that is simple, comprehensive and fair?

"It's the economy, stupid" as an overarching concern is still a safe bet. According to Rasmussen, 82 percent of likely U. S. voters rank the economy as the leading issue in terms of how they will cast a ballot. Nothing else even comes close.

Furthermore, according to Gallup, 60 percent believe that the American economy, especially given recently spiking gasoline prices, isn't turning the corner to recovery, any time soon.

Most importantly, fewer that one-third of voters believes that America, as a nation, is currently headed in the right direction.

Perhaps the only hope for Republicans would be a Ronald Reagan clone.

Nah, that's not a good solution — not only would it be impossible to find one that can meet the 35-year-old age requirement, but isn't cloning illegal? No matter how noble the cause?

Alas, it appears that Republicans — at least during this election cycle — will have to learn to stop worrying and love the Mitt.

No wonder they're in such a funk.

March 13, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

GENDER EQUALITY ELUDES BOTH OVAL OFFICE AND CORNER OFFICE


Presidents-Day-2012Published February 29, 2012 in the Ventura County Star

Last week, despite the enormous strides being made by the rest of the world, the United States celebrated but another Presidents Day without a female president.

At present, 19 members of the fairer sex rule as head of state, and that's not counting the six who serve as queen or vice regal. While admittedly the membership roster for this unique "women's club" can only be characterized as modest, each name, which will invariably be followed by the designation "first" in history books, serves up a soupon of hope for subsequent generations of women as well.

The honor of being named the first female government leader goes to Khertek Amyrbitovna Anchimaa-Toka, who chaired the parliament of the Tuvan People's Republic from 1940 to 1944. A decade later, Suhbaataryn Yanjmaa served as acting president of Mongolia.

The 1960s introduced the world to a trio of female prime ministers: Sirimavo Bandarannaike (Sri Lanka), Indira Gandhi (India) and Golda Meir (Israel).

In college, I hung a poster of Ms. Meir in my bedroom that asked a rather impertinent question, "But can she type?"

During the 1970s, of the five women ruling their countries, the media spotlight shimmered largely on Argentina's Isabel Martinez de Perón and the United Kingdom's Margaret Thatcher.

During the 1980s, of 10 female national leaders, the only recognizable name seems to be Corazon Aquino of the Philippines, who ousted Ferdinand Marcos and outed wife Imelda's closetful of shoes.

The 1990s produced a bumper crop of women in charge, including 13 heads of state and 15 prime ministers. Citizens on every continent were becoming more comfortable with the management style characterized by experts as uniquely female.

So what's up with America? Polls keep demonstrating that voters reject the idea of a woman as president — not because they can't handle a woman as leader of the free world but because they can't handle a woman as commander in chief.

Hollywood hatched the idea for the eponymous television series starring Geena Davis to deliberately challenge sexist perceptions. The show's cancellation demonstrated that neither the viewing public nor the voting public had changed their minds about accepting a female commander in chief.

Here in Ventura County, gender equity is on hold as well. According to the Ventura County Women's Political Council, females make up a mere 32 percent of all city councils while holding 40 percent of the seats on education boards as well as the Board of Supervisors. So what's really problematic about so few women in politics?

Equity simply doesn't percolate up. Until Chief Kathleen Sheehan was tapped for the job of top cop in Port Hueneme (September 2010) and Chief Jeri Williams took over the Oxnard Police Department (January 2011), female chiefs of police were even scarcer than snowflakes in Ventura County.

Same song, second verse re: the Port of Hueneme. Until Jan. 3, 2011, when Commissioner Mary Anne Rooney took her seat, not a single female had served on the Oxnard Harbor District board. We are talking about 75 years despite a number of women tossing their bonnets into the ring.

Just last week, however, I had the pleasure of meeting Kristen Decas, the Port of Hueneme's first female executive director. First Rooney, then Decas — coincidence? Another impertinent question.

In a May 2009 article, Time magazine took a good hard look at female management style. The conclusion? Having women in charge is not only extremely lucrative but also essential to our brave new world.

The workplace-research group Catalyst studied 353 Fortune 500 companies and reported that those with the most women in senior management had the highest return on equity — by more than a third.

Scholars from Cambridge University and the University of Pittsburgh examined the so-called (by critics) "indecisiveness" that supposedly plagues female management style. It seems, according to the studies, that women do employ more caution than men — because they focus on the long term. Males, on the other hand, get off on risk — especially when surrounded by other men.

Then Time asked the most impertinent question: "Wouldn't the economic crisis have unfolded a bit differently if Lehman Brothers had had a few more women on board?"

With respect to current voters, while some perceive consensus building, conciliating and collaborating — the signature skills of female management style — as strengths that make women uniquely suited to lead, others perceive them as weaknesses. Still, our young people may very soon break this tie.

So I don't know how many more Presidents Days will pass without a female president, but Barbara Bush got my vote when she told Wellesley grads in 1990, "Somewhere out in this audience may even be someone who will one day follow in my footsteps, and preside over the White House as the President's spouse. I wish him well!"

 

 

 

February 29, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Barbara Bush, Chief Jeri Williams, Chief Kathleen Sheehan, Commander in Chief, Commissioner Mary Anne Rooney, Corazon Aquino, Ferdinand Marcos, Geena Davis, Golda Meir, Imelda Marcos, Indira Gandhi, Isabel Martinez de Perón, Khertek Amyrbitovna Anchimaa-Toka, Kristen Decas, Lehman Brothers, Margaret Thatcher, President's Day, Sirimavo Bandarannaike, Suhbaataryn Yanjmaa, Time magazine, Ventura County Women's Political Council

NATIONAL PRIDE TAKES THE COURT IN LITHUANIA

The Other Dream TeamPublished in the February 15, 2012 edition of the Ventura County Star

If you really want to learn the truth about world politics, sometimes your best bet is the sports pages. At least that was the case in 1988, when the USSR basketball team trounced the Americans in the semifinals at Seoul on their way to Olympic gold.

Sports writers were able to cut through the fog of communist propaganda by focusing on a fact the Soviets couldn't spin — four of the five starting players for the USSR team (Arvydas Sabonis, Sarunas Marciulionis, Rimas Kurtinaitis and Valdemaras Chomicius) were actually Lithuanians being forced to compete for the Soviets.

They also noted that while Lithuania — a tiny Baltic country about the size of West Virginia with a paltry population of 3 million — had been annexed, oppressed and brutalized under Stalin since 1944, it sure could produce basketball players.

Lithuania, you see, is a country that considers hoops its national pastime, if not religion. In fact, 90 percent of the population follows the sport.

Back in the late 1930s, when Lithuania was still sovereign, its teams captured two European basketball championships. Even the estimated 10 percent of all Lithuanian adults banished to Siberia managed to keep their spirits high by shooting hoops in the labor camps.

In the interests of full disclosure, both my maternal grandparents were born in Lithuania. Attending the Santa Barbara Film Festival with my Lithuanian hubby to see "The Other Dream Team" was a no-brainer. Neither was tucking Kleenex into my bag.

Before the film rolled, the 35-year-old director and co-writer, clad in faded jeans and nondescript shirt, hopped up on the stage of the Lobero Theater. For this self-described "100 percent Lithuanian," his documentary proved to be a three-year labor of love.

Still basking in the rosy glow of a Sundance success, Markevicius not only acknowledged the number of rabid-to-the-max basketball fans in the audience but also those who remembered to sport tie-dyed shirts in the colors of the Lithuanian flag (more later).

In 1991, Lithuania became the first republic to break away from an imploding Soviet Union after 52 agonizing years of occupation.

The split was hardly amicable and the documentary not only reminds the audience that it was Nobel Peace Laureate Mikhail Gorbachev who dispatched tanks to mow down unarmed Vilnius citizens but also illustrates the raw moral courage of Lithuanian independence leader Vytautas Landsbergis as well.

To demonstrate the difference between capitalism and communism, Ronald Reagan would recount the tale of the thrifty Soviet citizen who had squirreled away the asking price of an automobile. Due to production shortages, however, he was told his order would not be filled for 10 years.

"Do you wish morning or evening delivery?" the man was asked. "Afternoon," he quickly responded, "The plumber is coming in the morning."

In the same vein, the audience also chuckled as Chomicius confessed to smuggling Western contraband gleaned on road trips. The budding entrepreneur was merely attempting to subsidize the meager $100-a-month salary he earned as a star athlete.

Yet, the worst aspect of Soviet dominance was not the scarcity of cabbages or cars, but being forbidden to express one's culture, language and identity as a Lithuanian.

Most folks remember 1992 as the year America's "Dream Team" — including such professional icons as Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, Larry Bird and Charles Barkley — claimed top honors after defeating eight opponents by an average of 44 points.

However, another dream team also made its debut on the basketball court in Barcelona that year. The team was from Lithuania, and the dream belonged to the core four that defeated the Americans four years earlier under the Soviet banner.

Although the now-independent Lithuania had the talent, it lacked the capital to cover travel costs and operating expenses.

The athletes, however, were quick to embrace a "better dead than red" modus operandi, when, according to Alexander Wolff of Sports Illustrated: "The Grateful Dead donated $5,000 and, more symbolically, prevailed upon one of its licensees (artist Greg Speirs) to provide the Lithuanian players with the red, yellow and green tie-dyed T-shirts that have since become   as much a symbol of the end of the Cold War as those souvenir chunks of the Berlin Wall."

Speirs, in fact, acquired "major sponsor" status when he donated the $400,000 in profits realized from his trademarked "Slam Dunking Skeleton" basketball jersey to the team as well as Lithuanian children's charities.

It was on the Olympic podium, however, that the Lithuanians, who grabbed the attention, approval and affection of most spectators with their fast-break style, underdog status and uber-hip tie-dyed uniforms, found bronze to be more precious than gold.

And that's the truth Markevicius — rather than some sports writer — was ultimately able to uncover. The stoic Lithuanians trusted him enough to allow their tears to say it all.

 

February 14, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: "The Other Dream Team", Alexander Wolff, Arvydas Sabonis, Barcelona Olympics, basketball, Charles Barkley, Greg Speirs, Larry Bird, LIthuania, Magic Johnson, Marius Markevicius, Mikhail Gorbachev, Rimas Kurtinaitis, Ronald Reagan Michael Jordan, Sarunas Marciulionis, Seoul Olympics, The Grateful Dead, Valdemaras Chomicius, Vytautas Landsbergis

IT'S FIVE MINUTES TO MIDNIGHT; DOES ANYONE CARE?

FiveminPublished in the Wednesday, February 1, 2012 edition of the Ventura County Star

Last month's announcement by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that the symbolic Doomsday Clock had jumped to 11:55 p.m. came and went with scant notice by the press.

Back in 1947, when founding editor Hyman Goldsmith asked Maryl Langsdorf — artist and wife of a Manhattan Project physicist — to design the cover for the June issue of the Bulletin, she came up with a startling image.

She used the minute hand of a watch-face closing in on midnight to symbolize both impending apocalypse as well as a military-type countdown. In 1947, her timepiece, instantly dubbed the Doomsday Clock, showed 11:53 p.m.

During the past 65 years, peril was illustrated by the big hand moving closer or farther away from the witching hour, in line with the "Bulletin's" analysis of world events.

On Jan. 31, 1950, after intense debate and recommendations by his secretary of state, secretary of defense, and chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, President Harry S. Truman rendered one of the most sweeping decisions of his or any presidency.

As the world would learn that day, the United States would proceed with work on all forms of atomic weapons, including the so-called "super bomb." In their report on nuclear weapons, the American Catholic bishops — who were guilty of only venial hyperbole — warned, "We are the first generation since Genesis with the capability of destroying God's creation."

In 1953, in the closest approach to midnight since its inception, the Doomsday Clock clicked on 11:58 p.m. — as the United States and the Soviet Union tested thermonuclear devices within nine months of each other.

As beeping Sputniks I and II circled the planet in 1957, even more striking than the loss of face was the chilling realization that the intercontinental missiles launching the satellites could just as easily boost a nuclear warhead and aim it toward American soil.

In 1964, as the first baby boomers trotted off to college and shivered as they snickered at "Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb," the Doomsday Clock swung back to 11:53 p.m., once again. The Bulletin pointed to China's acquisition of nuclear weapons as well as conflicts brewing in the Middle East, the Indian subcontinent and Vietnam as its risk assessment reasons.

Cold War paranoia seemed to evaporate, however, with the fall of the Berlin Wall and by 1991, the big hand of the Doomsday Clock had reached all the way back to 17 minutes before the witching hour — the clock's earliest setting since its inception — reflecting the signing of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and the announcement of further unilateral cuts in tactical and strategic nuclear weapons by the superpowers.

After climate change and biohazard were added, however, the minute hand would eventually creep back up to 11:53 p.m., but nobody seemed to care.

Ask a present-day millennial what he or she knows about the Doomsday Clock and you will be told that the Doomsday Clock is the opening track of a 2007 Smashing Pumpkins album. The song, which is introduced by a rat-tat-tatting drum solo, also appeared twice in the 2007 "Transformers" movie.

Despite the planet being confronted, according to Arizona State University Earth and Space Exploration professor Lawrence Krauss, "with clear and present dangers of nuclear proliferation and climate change, and the need to find sustainable and safe sources of energy, world leaders are failing to change business as usual."

The International Energy Agency projects that, unless societies begin building alternatives to carbon-emitting energy technologies over the next five years, the world is doomed to a warmer climate, harsher weather, droughts, famine, water scarcity, rising sea levels, loss of island nations and increasing ocean acidification.

Jayantha Dhanapala, former United Nations under-secretary-general for disarmament affairs, points out that "failure to act on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty by leaders in the United States, China, Iran, India, Pakistan, Egypt, Israel and North Korea to cut off production of nuclear weapons material continues to leave the world at risk."

So why was the movement of the Doomsday Clock to a mere five minutes before midnight met with such an underwhelming response?

The agenda-setters in the news business think that we think a Doomsday Clock is boring.

While the mainstream media did manage to turn away from covering celebrities (who are famous for merely being famous) to highlight the Arab Spring, Occupy movements and/or political protests in Russia, they did so only after social networking sites had already created a buzz.

So, Smashing Pumpkins' fans — you already know in facing the challenges of nuclear power, climate change and/or nuclear conflict, people power is essential.

In 1946, as boomers, who are now starting to collect Social Security, appeared on the scene, Albert Einstein noted, "everything has changed, save the way we think."

Think differently, please?

January 31, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: "Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb", Albert Einstein, American Catholic bishops, Berlin Wall, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Doomsday Clock, Harry S. Truman, Hyman Goldsmith, Jayantha Dhanapala, Lawrence Krauss, Maryl Langsdorf, Smashing Pumpkins, Sputniks I and II, Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, The International Energy Agency, Transformers

COUNTY BRACES FOR DIRTY WORK BY SUPER PACS

258_stephen_colbertlarge_image-1Published in Wednesday, January 18, 2012 edition of Ventura County Star

Why does Stephen Colbert have a super PAC? According to the ersatz Republican with Mitt Romney-helmet hair and a Bill O'Reilly demeanor, "because I can and because it's funny."

In addition to his "Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow" super PAC, Colbert instituted a 501(c)(4) which can legally accept money from corporations and transfer the funds to his super PAC without naming names. Colbert finds scant difference between his 501(c)(4) and money laundering.

Thursday, Colbert announced he was running for president of the United States of South Carolina.

"You cannot be a candidate and run a super PAC," attorney Trevor Potter told Colbert on the air. "That would be coordinating with yourself, but you could have it run by somebody else — even a friend or business partner."

Colbert turned control of his super PAC over to Jon Stewart, thus illustrating the Mack truck-sized loophole in the law.

Potter, counsel to John McCain during the 2000 and 2008 presidential campaigns, told The New York Times that the beauty of Colbert's super PAC and 501(c)(4) is "bringing the audience inside the system. He can show them how it works and then leave them to conclude whether this is how it ought to work."

According to the Nielsen ratings, Colbert's viewers tend to be young, white, educated and male. So far this year, he's drawn 67 percent of his nightly audience from the highly coveted 18-49-year-old demographic.

So Colbert, the 11th of 11 children allegedly more funny than he is, connects with young people — so what? The "so what" is that, according to said young people, fake news shows like the "Colbert Report" have become their primary source of political information.

In fact, a Pew Research Center study on public knowledge of current affairs reported that audiences for the "Colbert Report" and its lead-in, "The Daily Show," score as well or better than audiences who get their news from conventional radio, television and Internet sources.

Colbert's viewers know that super PACs are becoming a big problem for the GOP. Already struggling to bring tea party members in under the big tent, the Republican Party is losing the monetary and strategic control once held over candidates.

The leadership is learning, first hand, that raising money the old-fashioned way may not be enough to counteract anti-Romney propaganda put out by the "Winning Our Future" super PAC backing Newt Gingrich or "The Red, White and Blue Fund" backing Rick Santorum.

Colbert's viewers know that super PACs are becoming a big problem for Mitt Romney, who is constantly forced to fight off a gaggle of foes, that but for the grace of the super PACs, would and should have dropped out by now.

Colbert's viewers know that super PACs are becoming a big problem for voters — especially those residing in states with early primaries.

Not only do super PACs enable a handful of wealthy individuals to finance all manner of campaign propaganda without disclosing their identities, but they can also inundate the airwaves in mudslinging spots, glut mailboxes with unrecyclable glossy mailers and tie-up telephones with annoying robocalls.

Super PACs will be coming to Ventura County very soon. Rep. Elton Gallegly's decision to retire at the end of this year makes the race for the new 26th Congressional District, which includes nearly all of Ventura County, highly competitive.

Based on voter registration and results of past elections, experts see no advantage for either political party, yet the outcome here may well determine partisan control of the House of Representatives in Washington, D.C.

Under the rules of California's new primary system, the top two vote-getters on June 5, regardless of party affiliation, will meet in November. The field currently boasts seven declared candidates — with even more rumored to emerge from the woodwork.

Democrats include county Supervisor Steve Bennett of Ventura, Oxnard Harbor District Commissioner Jess Herrera of Oxnard, Moorpark Councilman David Pollock, retired longshoreman Zeke Ruelas of Oxnard and Westlake Village businessman David Cruz Thayne.

Tuesday, Republican county Supervisor Linda Parks was joined by state Sen. Tony Strickland, who narrowly won an $11 million campaign against former Assemblywoman Hannah-Beth Jackson in 2008. Strickland, who has been campaigning in New Hampshire with Mitt Romney, returned home to toss his chapeau in the ring.

Simi Valley City Councilman Glen Becerra, considered by Gallegly as his heir apparent, told The Star, "This seat looks like it was designed for a Hispanic Republican."

It's going to get quite dicey between now and June.

As to Stephen Colbert, if you really want to incur his ire, just mention the Supreme Court ruling that money is speech. According to Colbert, the court's ruling in the Citizens United case was that "transparency would be the disinfectant but 501(c)(4)'s are warm, wet, moist incubators. There is no disinfectant."

Consider yourself warned.

 


January 18, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: 501(c)(4), David Cruz Thayne, David Pollock, Elton Gallegly, Glen Becerra, Hannah-Beth Jackson, Jess Herrera of Oxnard, John McCain, Jon Steward, Linda Parks, Mitt Romney, Republican Party, Stephen Colbert, Steve Bennett, Super PAC, Tony Strickland, Trevor Potter, voters, Zeke Ruelas

MAKING AND BREAKING NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTIONS

 

New-years-resolution-applePublished in the January 4, 2012 edition of the Ventura County Star

As author Maria Robinson once wrote, “Nobody can go back and start a new beginning but anyone can start today and make a new ending.”  
 
For those of you who made New Year’s resolutions, today is the day that marks your success or failure. After the third day, 90 percent resume their old eating habits, surrender to the lure of demon nicotine or start employing the holiday-gifted exercise machine as a clothes rack.
 
So why do we continue to make resolutions that we will inevitably break?  
 
Experts tell us that the beginning of every year seems to bring new hope that life can and will improve. On the other hand, we are inclined to develop amnesia when it comes to toting up our past failures. It’s far easier, instead, to yield to our deeply-felt yearnings for a fresh new start.
 
In the words of Oprah Winfrey, the New Year’s resolution becomes “another chance to get it right.”
 
So how can you ensure that you will get it right in 2012?

The first step is to set priorities---that means figuring out what is really important to you. Many of us rate spending time with family as No. 1, yet after honestly consulting our day planners, we find that we are not as devoted as we would like to believe. In fact, studies conclude that our kids spend less time with us than in school (900 hours per year) or in front of the boob tube  (1,500 hours per year).

Second, make your goal realistic. Each and every year, the most popular New Year’s resolution is to “lose weight” or “stay fit.” Not surprisingly, these vows evaporate within whiffing distance of the nearest fast food joint. With dieting--- or, indeed, with any other resolution---if you focus on the end result rather than carefully planning the steps needed to get there, you will have already failed.  
 
According to a Journal of Health article by Judith Matz and Ellen Frankel, “Despite a $50 billion diet industry promoting countless weight loss methods, approximately 95 to 98 percent of all diets fail.” Those who do succeed, do so by making lifestyle changes, one baby step at a time---from religiously keeping food diaries to scheduling more workouts per week to incrementally decreasing portion size.  
 
Third, as the Johnny Mercer song directs: “You've got to accentuate the positive . . . eliminate the negative.” Many resolutions fail because our brains, which more naturally receive positive goals, tend to sabotage or rationalize away objectives that scream “thou shall not.”
 
For example, if you decide it is time to stop barraging your Facebook friends with an unending stream of FarmVille requests, just remember that professionals predict you will inevitably succumb to the rationalization “but I need this [virtual cow].” You won’t be able to help yourself.  At least, that’s the gospel according to Donald E. Wetmore in “Positive Goal Setting.”
 
So rather than vowing to cease and desist behaving in an undesirable manner (such as responding to each and every text you receive with either “K” or “LOL”), perhaps you could resolve to learn a new vocabulary word each day and text it in a sentence to your friends. You will probably be positively rewarded in this educational endeavor---unless Autocorrect transforms your message into something either scatological or salacious.

Fourth, it’s almost impossible to rid oneself of a self-destructive habit without embracing a less self-destructive habit as a replacement. For example, if you are sick and tired of friends and family threatening to submit your name to The Learning Channel’s “Hoarding: Buried Alive,” first figure out the bad habit you wish to replace.  Hint: you might discover that all the clutter in your house is being generated in the name of procrastination, as in “I’ll clean up this mess later.” “A place for everything and everything in its place,” however, is the expert-endorsed mantra for pathological pack rats. Perhaps your new habit will involve frequent yet costly visits to your friendly neighborhood Container Store.
 
Fifth, make your resolution public---keeping a promise private, seriously minimizes accountability. A billboard might prove a bit too much but a blog or a social media post on your progress might yield the encouragement you need to succeed.  
 
Sixth, misery doesn’t just love company---it craves it. If your goal is to drink or eat less, avoid associating with boozers or attending social events that abound in culinary delights---like dinner at your mother’s house.
 
Finally, as Nike advises,  “Just do it.”  No excuses.
 
Major League pitcher Dave Beard, who wrote, “Many years ago I resolved never to bother with New Year’s resolutions and I’ve stuck with it ever since” gets the nod for actually achieving his goal.  
 
The rest of us will have to just keep trying.

January 04, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

STUDENT-RUN RADIO STATIONS FIND A HOME ON THE NET

Fall-of-college-radio-redo26Published on December 7, 2011

Question: What was America’s first college radio station?
 
Stumped? I’ve taught the history of media for more than three decades and I had absolutely no idea---until I looked it up.  
 
Initially known by the call letters 2ADD, WRUC (Wireless Radio of Union College) became the first student-operated radio facility in the United States when the station signed on at 8:00 PM on October 1, 1920.
 
A couple of engineering students from the Schenectady, New York campus hooked together five U tubes and produced a total of 27 minutes of music---with the ditty “Tell Me Little Gypsy”  as the initial song.
 
The original station, according to alum Doni Johnson, was located in a shack behind the administration building with the wire antenna strung between two nearby trees.
 
Today, WRUC, which bills itself as “the first station in the nation,” will broadcast with 100-watts at 89.7 FM and stream when Union College is again in session (January 2, 2012).

At a time when university administrators are selling off their radio licenses in order to balance the books, California Lutheran University students are busying themselves preparing for the launch of iCLUradio.com.   
 
Through the generosity of the Marvin E. and Martha K. Smith Foundation, an education suite consisting of a “smart” classroom with an adjoining production studio as well as a smaller studio dedicated to streaming student-produced internet radio programming has been completed.
 
Last month, more than 350 college radio stations took to the airwaves to protest the burgeoning list of institutions of higher education nationwide that have been liquidating or transferring their FM licenses to non-student operations---usually in response to budgets inundated in red ink and/or the uncertain future of terrestrial radio.
 
Mark Maben, general manager of Seton Hall University’s student-run station told USA Today, “In most cases, either an NPR affiliate or religious broadcasters are buying up the stations.”
 
“College radio is a dying institution,” reports ABC News. “Schools have a hard time keeping up with Top 40 networks because they just don’t have the money to do it.”
 
In addition, it’s becoming more and more difficult to justify the cost of running a broadcast radio station, especially in support of a media production curriculum.
 
Finally, with a fiscal downturn that threatens to linger even longer, no student-run station will be able to rely solely on student fees or donations.
 
So when push came to shove at Texas Tech, Augustana College (South Dakota) Chattanooga State Technical Community College, Vanderbilt University and the University of San Francisco, their respective administrations decided to cash in---employing the justification that a greater number of students would benefit from the proceeds of the radio license sale.  
 
The University of Houston bought Rice University’s broadcast tower, FM frequency and license for a staggering $9.5 million. Linda Thrane, vice president for public affairs at Rice, claims a student-led committee will be making recommendations on spending the nearly ten million dollar windfall.
 
Those on-air stations being threatened by budget cuts or sale of their licenses argue that campus radio stations provide an alternative to commercial broadcasting, serve as that all important first break to local musicians and make a platform available for idiosyncratic viewpoints.  

Ever since the 1960s, when the FCC began issuing class D licenses to 10-watt stations in order to further the development of FM, campus radio ushered in emerging musical trends---including punk, New Wave, indie rock and hip hop---long before those genres became mainstream.

Often employing a freeform format and encouraged to take risks and exercise creativity, a number of student-run radio stations found themselves basking in the national spotlight, garnering critical acclaim, and accorded status as an essential local media outlet.

Yet “student voices” don’t have to be “silenced,” as last month’s protestors tried to claim. Online radio is taking off, and once this techno-savvy generation gets on board with phone apps and who-knows-what media tool coming next, college radio will reinvent itself into something bigger and better than ever.
 
The student government at California Lutheran University was so convinced of this prospect that, even with their money already spread pretty thin, voted to fund the entire operating budget for iCLUradio.com next semester.  
 
California Lutheran University’s iCLU may not be the first student-run radio station in the nation, but its official launch online could not be any more historic for CLU---or Ventura County.
 
In its April 25, 1921 edition, the New York Times noted that a broadcast by the Union College radio club (an early incarnation of WRUC) could be heard 1,000 miles away. Next semester, the internet stream on iCLUradio.com should be accessible by any person on the planet with a computer. Hope you will give us a listen.

January 04, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

MAKING AND BREAKING NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTIONS


New-years-resolution-applePublished in the January 6, 2012 edition of the Ventura County Star

As author Marian Robinson once wrote, "Nobody can go back and start a new beginning but anyone can start today and make a new ending."

For those of you who made New Year's resolutions, today is the day that marks your success or failure. After the third day, 90 percent resume their old eating habits, surrender to the lure of demon nicotine or start employing the holiday-gifted exercise machine as a clothes rack.

So why do we continue to make resolutions that we will inevitably break?

Experts tell us that the beginning of every year seems to bring new hope that life can and will improve. On the other hand, we are inclined to develop amnesia when it comes to toting up our past failures. It's far easier, instead, to yield to our deeply felt yearnings for a fresh new start.

In the words of Oprah Winfrey, the New Year's resolution becomes "another chance to get it right."

So how can you ensure that you will get it right in 2012?

The first step is to set priorities — that means figuring out what is really important to you. Many of us rate spending time with family as No. 1, yet after honestly consulting our day planners, we find that we are not as devoted as we would like to believe. In fact, studies conclude that our kids spend less time with us than in school (900 hours per year) or in front of the boob tube (1,500 hours per year).

Second, make your goal realistic. Each and every year, the most popular New Year's resolution is to "lose weight" or "stay fit." Not surprisingly, these vows evaporate within whiffing distance of the nearest fast food joint. With dieting — or, indeed, with any other resolution — if you focus on the result rather than carefully planning the steps needed to get there, you will have already failed.

According to a Journal of Health article by Judith Matz and Ellen Frankel, "Despite a $50 billion diet industry promoting countless weight loss methods, approximately 95 to 98 percent of all diets fail."

Those who do succeed, do so by making lifestyle changes, one baby step at a time — from religiously keeping food diaries to scheduling more workouts per week to incrementally decreasing portion size.

Third, as the Johnny Mercer song directs: "You've got to accentuate the positive ... eliminate the negative." Many resolutions fail because our brains, which more naturally receive positive goals, tend to sabotage or rationalize away objectives that scream "thou shall not."

For example, if you decide it is time to stop barraging your Facebook friends with an unending stream of FarmVille requests, just remember that professionals predict you will inevitably succumb to the rationalization "but I need this (virtual cow)." You won't be able to help yourself. At least, that's the gospel according to Donald E. Wetmore in "Positive Goal Setting."

So rather than vowing to cease and desist behaving in an undesirable manner (such as responding to each and every text you receive with either "K" or "LOL"), perhaps you could resolve to learn a new vocabulary word each day and text it in a sentence to your friends. You will probably be positively rewarded in this educational endeavor — unless Autocorrect transforms your message into something either scatological or salacious.

Fourth, it's almost impossible to rid oneself of a self-destructive habit without embracing a less self-destructive habit as a replacement.

For example, if you are sick and tired of friends and family threatening to submit your name to The Learning Channel's "Hoarding: Buried Alive," first figure out the bad habit you wish to replace. Hint: you might discover that all the clutter in your house is being generated in the name of procrastination, as in "I'll clean up this mess later." "A place for everything and everything in its place," however, is the expert-endorsed mantra for pathological pack rats.

Perhaps your new habit will involve frequent yet costly visits to your friendly neighborhood container store.

Fifth, make your resolution public — keeping a promise private, seriously minimizes accountability. A billboard might prove a bit too much but a blog or a social media post on your progress might yield the encouragement you need to succeed.

Sixth, misery doesn't just love company — it craves it. If your goal is to drink or eat less, avoid associating with boozers or attending social events that abound in culinary delights — like dinner at your mother's house.

Finally, as Nike advises, "Just do it." No excuses.

Major League pitcher Dave Beard, who wrote, "Many years ago I resolved never to bother with New Year's resolutions and I've stuck with it ever since" gets the nod for actually achieving his goal.

The rest of us will have to just keep trying.


 

January 04, 2012 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Dave Beard, Donald E. Wetmore, Johnny Mercer, Marian Robinson, New Year's resolutions, Nike, Oprah Winfrey, Positive Goal Setting, priorities, realistic

BEING 'PUZZLED' ON CHRISTMAS---IT'S A GOOD THING


WynnePublished in the Ventura County Star on December 21, 2011

Come Christmas morning, youngsters all over Ventura County will find age-appropriate versions stuffed in their holiday stockings.

Centenarians — including Hilda Corson of Simi Valley and Ventura's Gladys Williams — ask Santa for them to keep their gray matter well stimulated. Troops in Afghanistan and Iraq consider their inclusion in holiday care packages as precious as home-baked cookies.

So what is this phenomenon — dubbed by author Coral Amende as "the numero uno indoor game in America since the 1920s"? It's the crossword puzzle — and on this very day in 1913, Joseph Pulitzer's New York World published the first one.

Apparently, America birthed three indigenous art forms. In addition to jazz and the hard-boiled detective novel, Will Shortz, New York Times crossword editor, puzzle creator, historian and puzzle master, felt compelled to add the subject of his life's work as well.

On Dec. 20, 1913, Arthur Wynne found himself approaching deadline and at his wits end. Every week, this Liverpudlian was tasked with filling an eight-page section of the New York World labeled "Fun." His stable of staples, which included such head-scratchers as rebuses, anagrams and math puzzles, had been used up. So at the eleventh hour, he opted for adding a new wrinkle to the traditional world square.

The first crossword puzzle (http://www.crosswordtournament.com/more/wynne.html) was diamond-shaped and contained no internal black squares. Wynne placed small numbers on the first and last blanks instead of supplying a list of clues — divided into across and down — utilized today.

Hints varied from "What bargain hunters enjoy" (sales) to "The fibre of the gomuti palm" (doh). Players were only expected to come up with a paltry 31 three- to seven-letter words. The current record for a Sunday New York Times puzzle, which is held by aficionados as the most daunting and difficult, is 150 words.

The new puzzle caught on instantaneously and became so trendy that the World's mailbox was immediately crowded with complaints if the newspaper failed to deliver a challenging crossword. In addition, Wynne started receiving submissions from readers at the rate of 25 a day. Not even the prestigious New York Times has been so richly blessed.

For nearly a decade, the World held a monopoly on crossword puzzles. In November 1924, however, the New York Herald Tribune published the first daily version. Soon newspapers across the fruited plain exploited the popular pastime and a crossword puzzle appeared in just about every newspaper.

New York Times Publisher Arthur Hays Sulzberger became so addicted to the Herald Tribune's crossword, that he decided his newspaper should boast a daily puzzle as well. In 1942, he hired Margaret Petherbridge Farrar (Wynne's former assistant editor) to instigate rules (most of which still guide modern crossword design) and to maintain the dignity factor expected of the Gray Lady.

If you are ever looking for a 14-letter word that means "a person who constructs crossword puzzles," the answer is "cruciverbalist" — but, in addition, you should also consider "accounting prof" and/or "Dr. Edward Julius."

California Lutheran University hired Professor Julius, who teaches financial accounting in both the traditional undergraduate and Adult Degree Evening Program, in 1981. The longtime member of Mensa and rabid trivia fanatic began crafting crossword puzzles at the tender age of 7, when his older brother showed him the ropes. Julius confesses that he didn't realize until years later, that most people liked to solve puzzles rather than create them.

His professional career as a cruciverbalist officially began at Rutgers University, when he managed to syndicate his weekly crossword in the Daily Targum to more than a thousand college newspapers across America. His graduate study at The Wharton School (University of Pennsylvania) was financed, in part, by a series of six crossword puzzle books for Bantam.

Julius, however, is most pleased that Shortz, the crossword guru and star of the 2006 documentary "Wordplay," credits him with having been the first constructor to emphasize popular culture in his work, thus earning Julius a pivotal place on the crossword puzzle timeline.

Even though so much competition exists these days for one's time and attention, Julius believes that "both solving and constructing crossword puzzles can become addictive simply because we verbivores and logophiles (lovers of words and wordplay) enjoy any challenge involving the dissection and interplay of words."

A demanding daily (15 x 15) puzzle takes him from 10 to 15 hours to construct. In the "olden days," he could only consult a college dictionary and almanacx. "Now, with the availability of almost any information on the Internet," he admits, "crossword construction is a far more efficient endeavor."

Solving crosswords also is far more efficient. In fact, if you get stuck this Sunday, cyber-elves are available on Christmas Day — as well as the other 364 — to assist you at http://www.oneacross.com/

But I would still use a pencil.


 

December 20, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Arthur Hays Sulzberger, Arthur Wynne, California Lutheran University, Ed Julius, New York Herald Tribune, New York Times, New York World, Will Shortz

Christmas 2009

Snochloe

  Christmas, 2009

Not meaning to gloat, but not only have the Kelley-Sharkey stockings been hung by the chimney with care—they’ve been emptied as well.  Due to scheduling conflicts, Christmas was celebrated on Thanksgiving this year with all but Nathan, Naomi and Max in attendance.  Jon and Beverly will be meeting up with them in Tempe, Arizona during the week before Christmas. 

During January, Jon and Beverly will be crossing off a mutual “bucket list” item as they cruise the Caribbean Leeward Islands with three other couples on a 40-foot catamaran.  To prepare, Jon enrolled in an online knot-tying course while Beverly is getting in shape with her Wii Fit Plus.  In May, these nostalgic boomers also plan to retrace Route 66.  While Jon considered leasing a red Corvette, Beverly argued, these days, the most attractive means of transportation favors comfort over speed.

Not only is Jon finishing up his third term as mayor but he is also breaking his vow to retire from politics.  Apparently, having been re-energized by the newly elected members of the council, Jon brims with plans for Port Hueneme.   As to the first lady, in addition to full-time teaching, Beverly will be taking on the presidency of the Friends of the Library and assisting with the second annual Sand Sculpture Contest.

Nathan, Naomi and Max are enjoying another year in Great Falls, Montana courtesy of the Air Force.  They fill us in, via daily texts, on the exploits of eight-year Max, the world’s greatest grandkid and a rabid-to-the-max fan of “Mythbusters.”  Hopefully, there won’t be too many pulse-pounding explosions in their future.  On the occasion of his summer visit this year, Max was quite miffed to learn the indoor pool at Grandma and Grandpa’s was closed for repairs.  “Is the beach still open?” he inquired.   He still loves to help out with culinary duties and finds the Montana climate with its diversity of weather to his liking.   In fact, he learned, firsthand, there’s nothing quite like donning snow boots during the first month of school.

The newlyweds (Aug. 31 marked 1st anniversary) are still gainfully employed.  Trevor is toiling away in the Music Division of MySpace and Angie is managing the Urban Outfitters store in Glendale.  They reside in a classy apartment in Silverlake and while they love their awesome view, foot traffic stimulates their puggle, Emmy Lou Harris, into fiercely vocal protection mode.  Whenever they need a temporary home for their canine companion, however, Jon and Beverly eagerly volunteer—they get to spoil their one-and-only “grand dog” and Chloe gets to visit with her BFF.

Brendan’s beard and longish locks are growing on us.  He’s become a fixture at Countrywide—having survived, during the past six years, an equal number of down-sizings as well as a merger with Bank of America.  He’s not wild about his new job in the Flood Insurance Division but not having to take work home on the weekends allows him to indulge his passions—penning graphic novels and creating music.

Warmest wishes from Chloe and her height-challenged frozen friend as well as Jonathan, Beverly, Nathan, Naomi, Max, Angie, Trevor, & Brendan

December 08, 2011 in Christmas Letter | Permalink | Comments (0)

Christmas 2008

 

Bev, Jon, Chloe copyDearest Friends and Family,                                                                                                            Christmas, 2008

We marked this year with both a wedding and a funeral. 

On August 31st, Angie St. Louis and Trevor Kelley officially tied the knot.  The bride’s mother Jane and husband Jim were astute enough to allow the couple to make the occasion uniquely theirs.  No traditional readings would have been as appropriate (or chuckle-inducing) as the frank and revealing anecdotes recounted by their closest pals from New York.  All was as it should be--with their dog Emmy outfitted in a dress that matched the bridesmaids and the officiant quoting Keats.  As Trevor and Angie recited their vows, (Trevor read his off his Blackberry) those of us in attendance felt like we were eavesdropping on a private conversation between the two of them—the candor and depth of their feelings for one another was quite moving.

Lillian, Jon’s strikingly beautiful mother, passed away on September 16th.  Ever since an accidental fall at work six years ago and increasing troubles with her heart, her seemingly boundless energy had finally narrowed to a trickle. Eventually, a problem with shortness of breath kept her from even venturing out to shop for groceries or to pick up her mail.  It was not, she would insist, the way she had envisioned her “golden years.” When an operation to replace a faulty aortic valve in her heart was proposed, she convinced her surgeon that she was ready, willing and able to tackle the difficult work necessary to achieve a full recovery, despite having celebrated an 84th birthday.  Lillian literally sailed through the operation, sufficiently mobile to leave the cardiac care unit in just three days.  A complication requiring emergency surgery was the last thing anybody, including her doctors, expected.  Jon and Beverly miss her so much—especially around 8:00PM, the time each day when she would check in via telephone.

Jon and Beverly spent Thanksgiving in chilly Great Falls, Montana, where Nathan, Naomi and Max now share domestic bliss, courtesy of the Air Force and Naomi’s extraordinary home-making skills.   Their 7 year-old grandson shoulders his “one-and-only” burden with aplomb, allowing his proud-as-punch grandparents to cheer wildly from the sidelines at athletic events, pound him with totally unnecessary questions about school, and force him to perform impromptu piano concerts at will.

Brendan has taken on a new look.  He’s now sporting a full beard and longish locks.  The facial hair-challenged Trevor is (the hippest shade of) green with envy.  Brendan’s also got a new job. The Flood Insurance Tracking Services people at Countrywide were so impressed with his quality/productivity scores that they recruited him to their division.  He cheerfully made the transfer to take a sorely needed respite from the carpal tunnel-exacerbating work he’s had to endure the past two years and, of course, more moola. 

Jon, again taking his turn as mayor this month, keeps telling Beverly that he will retire from political office in two years.  She doesn’t believe him.  He keeps busy with his piano tuning business, flying a Cessna whenever possible, and walking the beach with his favorite Yorkie.

Beverly, who was procrastinating big time re: finishing a conference paper this summer, whiled away the time refinishing the bedroom furniture.  She keeps busy juggling chair stuff (this semester only) and classes, writing her bi-weekly column for the Star, and walking the beach with her favorite Yorkie.

The best of all holiday wishes from the entire Kelley-Sharkey enchilada:  Jonathan, Beverly, Nathan, Naomi, Max, Brendan, Trevor, Angie & Chloe

December 08, 2011 in Christmas Letter | Permalink | Comments (0)

CHRISTMAS LETTER 2011

IMG_1751 IMG_1794

Dear Friend and Family,                                                                                               Christmas, 2011

Having reached that certain age, Beverly observes that not only does Christmas tend to arrive at warp speed these days, but each year invariably brings more changes than anybody is really comfortable in accommodating. 

Last year at this time, even though the economy was circling the drain, both Angie and Trevor managed to find better jobs.  Forever 21 allowed Angie to cut down on traveling while Disney Music Group has already given their newest Digital Marketing director (Trevor) a promotion.  They still call Silver Lake home and are crazy busy with jobs, socializing with friends, and catering to Emmylou Harris (canine version). 

Having put in four years with missiles in Great Falls, Montana, Nathan, now an Air Force Captain, is looking forward to working on the space side---his real passion.  The family will be transferring to Washington DC, where Nathan will be involved with NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)---specifically, weather satellites.  Naomi laments leaving her besties but is energized about living so close to the nation’s capital.  Since 10-year old Max is crazy about sightseeing in general, this move is right up his alley.  We hope they find room in their new digs for a couple of freeloading relatives and their winsome Yorkie.

Of all the offspring, Brendan seems to have set down the deepest roots.  He’s managed to survive so many reductions in forces at Countrywide, we’ve lost count.  He has great affection for Fort Worth and the close friends with whom he shares weekend activities.  He still amazes us with the number of graphic novels he has authored as well as the music he creates on the computer.  Brendan, his proud mother proclaims, is a truly happy person.

Beverly will be retiring, after 35 years, from California Lutheran University in August 2012.  This semester she was happily tasked with preparing for the launch of the student online radio station.  Her spring semester sabbatical will include the release of her third book (a history of political American film) and the presentation of a popular culture paper on Dr. Strangelove in Boston. 

Jon still relishes his position as a civic leader but is chagrined to find himself the institutional memory of the Port Hueneme City Council.  This intrepid adventurer, however, isn’t looking forward to facing his biggest life challenge---trying to coexist with Beverly-the-mystery-writer 24/7.  Yet not only is Jon throwing Beverly a big birthday bash in January but he is also arranging travel in April to destinations on both their bucket lists---Stonehenge and Paris.  It doesn’t get any better than this.

Wishing you the fulfillment of all your dreams at Christmas and during the New Year.

With much love,

Jon, Beverly, Nathan, Naomi, Max, Brendan, Trevor, & Angie

December 08, 2011 in Christmas Letter | Permalink | Comments (0)

A NORMAN ROCKWELL THANKSGIVING

Freedom-from-WantPublished in the November 23, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

When you find yourself suddenly single, especially if you are solely responsible for your offspring, it's all about plotting a new and different course through life. The most challenging stretch of road, I believe, is that portion of pavement punctuated, each and every coming year, by the holidays.

I remember, as I was bewailing my lot in life, a similarly circumstanced friend advising, "Just resign yourself to the fact that this year you won't be enjoying a Norman Rockwell Thanksgiving."

With "Freedom from Want," Rockwell painted the most idyllic version of Thanksgiving that most of us have ever seen.

The focal point of his picture is a 30-pound turkey, the perfect shade of golden-brown, being gently lowered to its place of honor on a tablecloth bleached so white it stings the eyes.

The woman doing all the work is a sober, bespectacled matron — her gray hair pulled back in a bun and her flower-print dress covered up by a full lace-trimmed apron. You can be sure that the original protective garment — now decorated with grease stains and flecks of potato — has been crumpled up and hastily abandoned next to the oven.

Standing directly behind her, sporting his Sunday-best suit, is her spouse of nearly four decades, whispering sugary words of encouragement.

The nine or so guests of various ages gathered around the table seem oblivious to the bird's arrival. Instead, they are engaged in animated conversation with each other — heads bent forward and smiles plastered across every visage.

Nobody is bringing up, for the umpteenth time, slights carted around since childhood. Nobody is assassinating the character of a relative who, for whatever reason, is not in attendance. Nobody has arrived at this celebration with anything more to share with the others than good will and unconditional love.

Rockwell admits that "Freedom from Want," first published in March 1943, was inspired by a presidential address in which Franklin D. Roosevelt touted four freedoms necessary for universal rights.

Reproduced in consecutive issues of the Saturday Evening Post — alongside thought-provoking essays by contemporary writers — Rockwell's interpretation of free speech, free religion, freedom from want and freedom from fear proved so popular that when the original paintings toured the United States in an exhibition jointly sponsored by the Post and the United States Department of the Treasury, war bonds enjoyed a staggering $130 million in sales.

A gifted observer of everyday life, Rockwell sketched the passing moments in small-town America that struck a chord in him. He invited ordinary-looking people — family, friends and perfect strangers — to pose for him. His populist approach, plus an eye for detail and drama, provided his pictures with both charm and credibility.

"Freedom from Want" was hardly the only time Rockwell painted a heartwarming Thanksgiving scenario.

The Literary Digest published a red-cheeked Grandma bearing a silver platter groaning under the weight of a rather overdone turkey on Nov. 22, 1919.

The Thanksgiving 1921 edition of the Country Gentleman brought together a typically Rockwell-winsome boy and girl, who are intensely competing in a traditional wishbone contest.

"Ye Glutton," which featured a locked-in-the-stocks Pilgrim who is being publicly ridiculed for overeating, appeared on the cover of Life Magazine in 1923.

On Nov. 24, 1945, the Saturday Evening Post celebrated the end of World War II with "Home for Thanksgiving," a kitchen tableau in which a still-uniformed GI provides assistance to his harried-yet-happy mother in the potato-peeling department.

In 1953, the five-member Rockwell family relocated to Stockbridge, Mass. — only 162 miles from the site of the "First Thanksgiving," a three-day feast in 1621 that featured neither turkey nor pumpkin pie on the menu.

Rockwell was seeking psychiatric treatment for his wife and would himself spend years in therapy with celebrated analyst Erik Erikson to deal with loneliness and depression. You see, Rockwell was as much a personally created myth as the mid-20th-century America he depicted on magazine covers.

Married three times, Rockwell remained a complex, conflicted workaholic, who, according to his oldest son, Jarvis, invariably put his art above all else.

"That was his life," Jarvis told the Berkshire Eagle. "He worked everything out in his painting."

So those of you who, for one reason or other, won't be enjoying a Norman Rockwell Thanksgiving tomorrow, please take comfort in this pair of quotations.

According to Rockwell biographer Laura Claridge, during a session with his world-famous patient, Erik Erikson couldn't help pointing out, "Norman, you didn't live your happiness; you just painted it."

John F. Kennedy, on the other hand, provides some sage advice concerning Thanksgiving, "As we express our gratitude, we must never forget that the highest appreciation is not to utter words, but to live by them."

November 22, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: Country Gentleman, Erik Erikson, Freedom from Want, John F. Kennedy, Laura Claridge, Life Magazine, Literary Digest, Norman Rockwell, Saturday Evening Post, Thanksgiving

WRITING OFF ANY HOPE OF REMAINING ANONYMOUS

 

Anon
Published in the Wednesday, November 9, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

Joe Klein had 6 million reasons for passing himself off as Anonymous. You probably remember his 1996 roman à clef, "Primary Colors," the thinly veiled, warts-and-all account of William J. Clinton's 1992 bid for the Oval Office. This titillating tome, based on very inside sources, spent nine weeks at No. 1 on The New York Times best-seller list.

Nobody would have begrudged Klein the lucre he gleaned from his clever "whodunit" marketing ploy had he 'fessed up to being the "Primary Colors" secret scribe the first time he was confronted, but Klein, the highly respected, award-winning Newsweek columnist, continued to prevaricate.

Frustrated by the rigged shell game Klein was perpetuating on the media, the Washington Post's Style editor David von Drehle cornered Klein during an interview and coaxed him to put his credibility and journalistic ethics on the line. Still, Klein wouldn't own up to the truth. It would take five months and a handwriting analyst in the employ of the Washington Post to finger Klein.

Klein also spent the same five months wrangling multimillion-dollar deals for the paperback rights, international (19 countries) rights and film rights for a book that would end up upping his bank balance by at least a cool $6 million.

Now let's turn to another "Anonymous," namely the recently released film that speculates on the actual identity of the author of various plays and sonnets credited to William Shakespeare. This whodunit question has not only intrigued countless academic scholars but also such literary giants as Mark Twain, Charles Dickens, Henry James and Sigmund Freud.

The film, directed by Roland Emmerich, who is also responsible for such explosion-heavy dystopian extravaganzas as "Independence Day" and "2012," conjured up the latest assault (for fun and profit) on the grammar school-educated glove maker's son from downtown Stratford-upon-Avon.

The premise: surely no ordinary man (read "itinerant practitioner of a disreputable profession with no connections to the educated elite") could have possibly penned such masterpieces as "Romeo and Juliet" or "Hamlet."

So instead of Sir Francis Bacon, the sixth Earl of Derby or even Christopher Marlowe, "Anonymous" claims that Edward de Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, deserves the dozen or so pages in Bartlett's Familiar Quotations — instead of the bawdy Bard we all know and love.

But Emmerich's film doesn't just stop with asking, as a rosy Juliet did with "what's in a name?" — "Anonymous" also had to come up a reason for the Earl of Oxford, "a most wretched soul bruised with adversity," to allow a commoner to claim his literary legacy.

Here is where the quality of credulity is strained much more than mercy ever was. Spoiler alert — this is the first of four additional conspiracy theories unveiled by Emmerich. To save the child de Vere supposedly fathered in a sizzling affair with Elizabeth I, he is forced sign over the parcel of political plays he's passionately penned.

At this point, those moviegoers with even a passing knowledge of the Bard's work will probably be asking themselves "the leave or not to leave" question.

Most Shakespearean experts claim the film is making much ado about nothing. After all, according to Roger Ebert, "very few commoners of his time are as well-documented as William Shakespeare. There seems little good reason to doubt he wrote the plays performed under his name."

Stratfordians argue that Oxfordian theory (hatched in 1920 by a schoolmaster with the unfortunate name of John Thomas Looney) is simply impossible — de Vere died in 1604 before a number of Shakespeare's most famous plays were written. Oxfordians counter, "Do we really know when these plays were written, or are we merely making an educated guess?" Lord, what fools these mortals be.

Finally, teachers in general are disturbed by the film's unapologetic dismissal of complaints about factual errors.

"It's the best of both worlds for Emmerich," noted Stephen Marche, a former Shakespeare scholar, in The New York Times Magazine. "He gets to question hundreds of years of legitimate scholarship ... because, after all, it's just a movie."

When Vassar English professor Donald Foster, assisted by complicated computer analysis software, was able to attribute an obscure 578-line elegy to William Shakespeare, New York Magazine asked him to take a crack at figuring out who actually authored "Primary Colors."

After sifting through hundreds of thousands of words, written by more than a dozen suspects, Foster pointed to Klein as the only possible choice.

In his Feb. 26, 1996, article for New York Magazine, Foster added, that in 1609, Shakespeare, too, remarked on the difficulty of remaining anonymous once one's style had become a matter of public record; when "every word doth almost tell my name."

As Mercutio would say, "a plague on both your houses." But would he say it anonymously?

November 09, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Anonymous, Charles Dickens, Christopher Marlowe, David von Drehle, Donald Foster, Edward de Vere, Henry James, Joe Klein, John Thomas Looney, Mark Twain, Primary Colors, Roger Ebert, Roland Emmerich, Sigmund Freud, Sir Francis Bacon, Stephen Marche, the sixth Earl of Derby, William Shakespeare, Willliam J. Clinton

OUT OF THEIR GOURDS OVER PLUMP PUMPKINS

 

PumpkinmaxPublished on October 26, 2011 edition of Ventura County Star

"There are three things I have learned never to discuss with people," offers Linus van Pelt in the Peanuts comic strip, "religion, politics and the Great Pumpkin."

Nobody knows where Linus will show up this year to await the Great Pumpkin, but the Giant Pumpkin Commonwealth (GPC), the official body that sanctions more than 90 pumpkin weigh-offs worldwide, estimates that each year 10,000 amateur growers cultivate Atlantic Giant pumpkins — the perfect candidate to stand in for Linus' toy-distributing Halloween icon.

Atlantic Giants bulk up so quickly you can almost see them grow. During their peak growing season, their weight can spike as much as 50 pounds per day. It literally takes a village to pick up an Atlantic Giant, these days, or at least a couple of buddies with a heavy-duty crane.

The furrow to prize-winning pumpkins can be traced, believe it or not, to Henry David Thoreau. Three years after penning "Walden," Thoreau planted a Potiron Jaune Gros de Paris (fat yellow Paris pumpkin) in his garden in Concord, Mass., that reached an astonishing 123.5 pounds.

Though gigantic by most standards, Thoreau's pumpkin paled in comparison to one grown in southwest England, tipping the scales at 245 pounds.

After the turn of the century, William Warnock, a machinist and farmer from Goderich, Ontario, produced a 403-pounder for the 1904 St. Louis World's Fair — a record that held for more than 70 years.

With the current champion at 1,810.5 lbs, brought in by Chris Stevens, a general contractor from New Richmond, Wis., pumpkin producers are redoubling their efforts — learning complex biochemistry, plant genetics and microbiology as well as devising a slew of scientific strategies involving natural growth hormones, super-nutrients developed by NASA, double grafting and top secret brews of compost and soil supplements.

These folks invest thousands of dollars in water, fertilizers, mechanized farming equipment and a chemical armory to wage war on pumpkin-specific insects and disease. Pruning, weeding, feeding and watering has become, for them, a full-time job.

Rumor has it that the next record-breaker might ripen in the warm California sun. The extreme summer weather has somewhat dampened the prospects of contestants residing in the Midwest.

Professional tree-trimmer Don Young has set state pumpkin records in both Iowa and California. In 2009, Conan O'Brien, behind the wheel of a monster truck, smashed one of Young's enormous pumpkins on his television show.

Young regularly lays out $8,000 (he doesn't have) a year and uses 27,000 gallons of water a month — nearly enough to supply a family of four for a year — in his quest to produce a one-ton pumpkin.

Left to her own devices, Mother Nature never intended pumpkins to swell as large as a small car.

Giant pumpkins are cultivated from seeds the size of a quarter. Last fall, a Stevens 1810.5 (which came from the 1810.5 record-holder cultivated by Chris Stevens) brought a staggering $1,600.

Before that, Ron Wallace's 1,068 pound pumpkin yielded the most sought-after seed in the world. What was his secret? Wallace told CBS Sunday Morning in 2007, "We use a lot of fish, kelp, humic acid. The humates help open up the soil for microbial activity," he explained.

"Add any potassium or calcium, adjust the pH," he continued. "You know, we'll do all that in the fall. And then during the season we do tissue tests."

Due to shape, weight or weather, growth hormone-pumped pumpkins can split or rot from the inside, shattering dreams of prize money and that coveted mention in the Guinness Book of World Records. That's exactly what happened to the Wallace family, for more years than they care to remember.

In their story, told by Susan Warren in "Backyard Giants: The Passionate, Heartbreaking, Glorious Quest to Grow the Biggest Pumpkin Ever," Wallace muses, "Granted, you're always going to lose a pumpkin or two. But you know what? Me and my father deserve a little luck. I guess it's like Clint Eastwood said in 'The Unforgiven,' 'Deservin's got nothing to do with it.'"

"All you can really ask for," he added, "is opportunity."

So why do it? "By God, if we can get a pumpkin up to a ton, imagine what we can do to somebody's vegetable crop," GPC President Dave Stelts told Smithsonian Magazine. "What we are doing will be reflected on the dinner table of America."

Every time Charlie Brown asks Linus when he's going to "stop believing in something that isn't true," Linus vows he will give up when Charlie Brown stops believing in Santa Claus. The two friends appear to be separated by denominational differences.

Linus has waited for the Great Pumpkin every Halloween since 1960. That's five decades with no payoff. Yet, Linus remains undeterred. Someday, he'll find the patch the Great Pumpkin deems "most sincere." End of discussion.

  © 2011 Scripps Newspaper Group — Online

October 25, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (2)

Technorati Tags: Atlantic Giants, Chris Stevens, Dave Stelts, Don Young, Giant Pumpkin Commonwealth, Great Pumpkin, Guiness Book of World Records, LInus, Peanuts, Ron Wallace, Susan Warren, Thoreau, William Warnock

PAYBACK PROVES POPULAR ON TV AND THE STREETS

 

 

Revenge-TV-Show-TitlePublished in the October 12, 2011 Edition of the Ventura County Star

"We're dealing in a particular time right now in American history, where I think the average American is going to want to see a takedown of the rich," claims Madeleine Stowe — the actress you love to hate in the new ABC series, "Revenge."

Columnist Deroy Murdock recently opined, "It's official: America is at class war; and President Barack Obama proudly leads the charge against this country's wealthy."

In fact, "Occupy Wall Street" dissent has already reached Ventura County — with placard-waving protesters gathering on Ventura Boulevard in Old Town Camarillo only last Wednesday. Their declaration that "We are the 99 percent" is an attempt to draw attention to the massive disparity in wealth distribution in America.

Every time one of the 99 percent reads about a single millionaire who pays less to the IRS than they do, they burn with righteous indignation.

Their biggest beef is "It's the stalled economy, stupid." They see too many Americans losing homes, retirement savings and medical care while banks hoard loan loot, Wall Street feeds its greed gene and partisans diddle in D.C.

Now Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid comes along and proposes a "millionaire surtax" that promises to turn the tables on the 1 percent but ends up merely pandering (with no chance of being passed) to the 99 percent.

Winning critical approval and the 10 p.m. Wednesday night slot against "CSI" and "Law and Order, SVU," "Revenge" is billed as a contemporary re-imagining of "The Count of Monte Cristo."

The drama centers on a protagonist bent on payback named Emily Thorne (Emily Van Camp). A nouveau riche lass with no past, Emily is unwisely welcomed by a slew of swells in the Hamptons. Yet, she isn't exactly new to the neighborhood. In fact, she regularly summered there with her father until a frame-up by local fat cats landed him in the hoosegow. Seventeen years later, Emily is back, loaded and determined to right wrongs — with a vengeance.

For those who passed on reading "The Count of Monte Cristo," the serialized novel published in 1844 not only remains in print in all modern languages, but also is the subject of some 29 films.

The narrative of the Alexandre Dumas classic follows the wrongfully imprisoned Edmond Dantes who escapes from jail, acquires a fortune and sets about getting even with the trio who destroyed his life. Unfortunately, his plans bear devastating consequences for the innocent as well as the guilty.

"Revenge is universal," claims the ABC series creator and producer Mike Kelley ("One Tree Hill," "Swingtown" and "The OC"), who was drawn to the topic because "revenge crosses time and culture. It starts unwinnable wars and visits generations of blood feuds on families with unsettled scores. Revenge is as old as humanity."

But in real life, is revenge really as sweet as it seems?

Actually, it is — at least, it is at first. "When (people) exact revenge, there is genuinely a feeling of relief and even a release of serotonin and oxytocin into the brain that will make someone feel better," writes Mia Bloom, professor of international studies and women studies at Penn State University.

A brain-imaging study published in Science in August of 2004 suggests we feel satisfaction when we punish others for bad behavior. "A person who has been cheated is (left) in a bad situation — with bad feelings," notes study co-author Ernst Fehr, director of the Institute for Empirical Research in Economics at the University of Zurich. "The person would feel even worse if the cheater does not get her or his just punishment."

In fact, "people who are more vengeful," writes psychologist Ian McKee in Social Justice Research, "tend to be those who are motivated by power, by authority and by the desire for status. They don't want to lose face."

Current ads for the show feature the aphorism, "revenge is a dish best served cold." While often attributed to Mario Puzo who authored "The Godfather," the credit for the maxim actually belongs to Marie Joseph Eugene Sue with "Mathilde," a French novel that appeared in print at the same time as "The Count of Monte Cristo."

These days, most people believe the most satisfying retribution results from a calculated plan. Not only should it be long in coming but also totally unexpected. This is the "dish-best-served-cold" impetus behind the modus operandi of Emily Thorne.

Yet, in "Mathilde," Sue was actually cautioning his character to forestall vengeance with his "dish best served cold." The wounded party was to wait until passion had cooled and rationality had the chance to reassert itself.

"Revenge is a kind of wild justice," wrote Francis Bacon 300 years ago, "which the more a man's nature runs to, the more law ought to weed it out."

Something to think about — right, Sen. Reid?


  © 2011 Scripps Newspaper Group — Online

October 11, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (2)

Technorati Tags: " Deroy Murdock, "Revenge, Ernst Fehr, Francis Bacon, Harry Reid, Ian McKee, Marie Joseph Eugene Sue, Mathilde, Mia Bloom, Mike Kelley, Occupy Wall Street, The Count of Monte Cristo

NEW ON NETFLIX---WHINING AND ENTITLEMENT THINKING

Reed_hastings_netflix Published in the November 28, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

I have never received a missive from a chief executive officer before, much less one that began, "Dear Beverly, I messed up. I owe you an explanation."

The remarkably frank mea culpa — in which the aforementioned CEO criticized the way he had communicated a pricing change — actually included the sentence, "In hindsight, I slid into arrogance based upon past success." The email was signed "Respectfully, Reed Hastings, Co-Founder and CEO, Netflix."

Hastings' dispatch gave me pause.

I have been a subscriber to Netflix since December 2006. I've stuck around for two main reasons. First, with the two-DVD plan, I can expect a new red envelope in my mailbox, six days a week. The turnaround, since I reside near a distribution center, is close to warp speed. Second, the return date for any DVD I select is always "whenever."

So why did Hastings feel the need to issue me an apology?

It all started when the highly successful entrepreneur opted to separate his streaming video service from the DVD-by-mail division — a decision that makes perfect sense given his underlying rationale.

Streaming and DVD-by-mail are completely separate businesses. Each requires a very different cost structure, distribution method, marketing approach and management style. Most important, however, is the issue of licensing fees.

To rent out a DVD, all Hastings had to do was buy it. Netflix was spared any per-view or per-customer fees. To offer streaming (TV or film), however, Hastings was forced to shell out fees based on his total number of subscribers — currently at a staggering 26 million.

Studios in Tinsel Town are demanding that Hastings pay a per-subscriber-per-month licensing fee despite the millions of customers who rarely or never stream. Only by splitting Netflix in two — Qwikster (DVDs) and Netflix (streaming only) — was the second company, Netflix, eligible to compensate Hollywood on the basis of a substantially smaller subscriber base.

Yet, a good business decision never has a chance against self-absorbed whining and entitlement thinking — especially the nearly 27,000 comments, mostly natteringly negative, that managed to bloat Netflix's blog in response to Hastings' hasty act of contrition.

The carping coalesced around dual points of contention — cost and convenience. All subscribers were asked to accept a price hike. Streaming only costs $7.99 a month. Two DVDs-at-a-time costs $11.99 a month. Those desiring both (hybrid) would be billed separately (total $19.98) by both Netflix and Qwikster.

While I don't relish price increases any more than the next guy, I do understand the need for them — given spiking costs in all other sectors of the economy. Netflix, for me, is a necessary luxury. What I don't understand, however, is all the griping about inconvenience.

"It's as if I went to Mickey D's and had to stand in one line to order the bun, and another to order the meat," posted Lory Montgomery. Really, Lory? Where exactly are you standing in line?

Visiting two different Internet sites, depending on the delivery system I choose for a film or TV show, doesn't pose much of a hardship or hassle for me.

Yet a poll by PC Magazine found that 55 percent of Netflix members were going to pull the plug on their subscriptions.

Since July 12, Netflix Inc. stock has plummeted 55 percent.

Every day, financial analysts and money managers predict that is it only a matter of time before Netflix goes belly up.

Hastings has made tough decisions before. In 2005, for example, he decided to cut Netflix's pricing to defuse a competitive threat from Blockbuster. A Wall Street chorus of Cassandras, stuck in dirge mode, predicted the end was near for Netflix. Yet, wasn't it Blockbuster that shuttered its stores?

In the end, separating DVDs from streaming will prove a better deal for all Netflix customers.

It's important to remember that Hastings wasn't apologizing for the changes — it was his clumsy miscommunication about the changes that he regretted.

"I got the idea for Netflix after my (first) company (Pure Atria) was acquired," the Netflix CEO told The New York Times. "I had a big late fee for 'Apollo 13.' It was six weeks late and I owed the video store $40."

The day he founded Netflix, Hastings didn't know if anybody would sign up, but unlimited due dates and nonexistent late fees seemed to work in a powerful way.

When Hastings was featured in a front-page article in USA Today in 1995, he posed with his Porsche. These days, he told the Wall Street Journal, he would surround himself with "a bunch of movies." Hastings' all-time favorite is "Gloomy Sunday" — a love triangle set in Budapest — complete with sadness and redemption.

"Thankfully," he told CNN, "there are no parallels to Netflix."

September 28, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (4)

Technorati Tags: "Gloomy Sunday", Netflix, Quikster, Reed Hastings

Kelley: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE NEEDS TO EVOLVE, REFORM

Franklinwithkey Published in the September 14, 2011 edition of Ventura County Star

We all know that Ben Franklin, America's first postmaster general, opened a post office in his old house (316 Market St. in Philadelphia) on July 26, 1775. Now his post office, which is still operational after more than two centuries, is slated to be shuttered along with 3,653 others across the fruited plain.

Despite the considerable changes in the world since Franklin's day, the U.S. Postal Service manages to deliver an average of 563 million pieces of mail a day, six days a week.

We may not enjoy schlepping packages and waiting in line, but do take pleasure in counter workers who ask after the family, conversing up-close-and-personal with neighbors (largely invisible and inaccessible behind block walls) and the convenience of such close-to-home services as processing passports and supplying tax forms.

For a measly 44 cents, not only does the USPS service (via pack mule) the Havasupai Indian reservation at the bottom of the Grand Canyon, but it also operates branches in towns of fewer than 100 residents. And that's a big part of the problem.

First, according to Dean Granholm, the Postal Service's delivery and operations vice president, 84 percent of post offices on the hit list take in less than $27,500 in annual revenue while generating about two hours of actual work per day.

Second, the popularity of email and electronic bill payments sent the whole concept of snail mail into a tailspin. According to the Government Accountability Office, in just the past five years, the USPS' annual volume has plummeted by 43.1 billion pieces. This loss is the major factor behind a $5.6 billion decrease in annual revenues from 2006 to 2010. The USPS expects first-class mail income to plummet another 37 percent during the next decade.

Third, the Postal Service's package business — the one genuinely profitable portion of its operation — can no longer compete with the likes of UPS and FedEx.

Savings from the closings could amount to as much as $200 million. But the closings also translate into potentially massive layoffs. According to Granholm, as many as 3,000 postmasters, 500 supervisors, and 500 to 1,000 clerks would be let go.

The first shutterings are expected by January 2012. None are scheduled in Ventura County. The only change of note is the move by the Oxnard Bulk Mail Entry Unit to the Oxnard Main Post Office, which occurred, without much fanfare or dissent, on Aug. 13.

Residents of Ventura County seem to echo the sentiments of Americans who view the USPS, at worst, as a time-to-jettison anachronism, and, at best, as the benign purveyor of junk mail — clogging our mailboxes with dozens of glossy catalogs, slick political mailers, grocery store specials and innumerable pleas from cash-strapped charities. 

But there's a new crisis on the horizon. If the Postal Service is forced to make its required $5.5 billion annual payment to the federal health care benefit plan, it will exhaust its $15 billion line of credit from the U.S. Treasury and trigger a default.

Postmaster General Patrick R. Donahoe testified before a Senate hearing that even with President Obama's three-month reprieve on the $5.5 billion payment, the post office would probably run out of cash and face a shutdown next July or August — unless Congress passes legislation supplying a long-term solution for the ailing agency. You can imagine the staggering blow to the economy a shutdown would entail.

With more than 500,000 employees, the USPS is the second-largest employer in the country — behind Walmart. Add to that loss the multiplier effect that would impact millions more jobs in related industries and that's the very definition of economic catastrophe.

"The Postal Service is on the brink of default," Mr. Donahoe testified. "The Postal Service requires radical change to its business model if is to remain viable in the future." What specific reforms will be implemented remains anybody's guess at the present.

Will the USPS be just another agency anointed by the Obama administration as "too big to fail" and be bailed out to the tune of billions of taxpayer dollars? Or will economic Darwinism prevail, with a slew of enterprising entrepreneurs figuring out how to make a buck where the USPS could not?

Ben Franklin's post office is the only one in America that doesn't fly an American flag. You see, Franklin's unassuming three-story brick domicile was called into service before America had become a nation, and the absence of the flag honors that distinction.

No matter how you feel about junk mail or the USPS's "has-been" status, the closure of your local post office — with its signature stars and stripes flapping in the breeze — would be a palpable loss to you and your community.

As for Ben Franklin, he'll probably be rolling over in his grave. Or, at least going postal.


 

September 13, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (2)

Technorati Tags: Ben Franklin, Dean Granholm, default, FEDEX, GAO, Postmaster General Patarick R. Donahoe, too big to fail, UPS, USPS, Walmart

JOBS' VISION CHANGED THE WAY WE WORK, PLAY

 
3_15_09_steve_jobs Published in the August 31, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

Randy Pausch succumbed to pancreatic cancer on July 25, 2008. Every semester, I play this computer science professor's last lecture, "Achieving Your Childhood Dreams," to inspire my students.

In an extremely moving presentation, presently preserved on YouTube, Pausch carefully staked out the territory he refused to cover in his speech — namely, cancer, his family and spirituality.

The only exception, he slyly added, would be admitting to having experienced "a deathbed conversion." Wait for it. "I just bought a Mac."

When the laughter and applause subsided, the virtual reality expert admitted, "I knew I would get 9 percent of the audience with that remark."

Astounding, as it may seem, Apple sold more Macs in the first quarter of 2010 than during an entire year a decade earlier.

Steve Jobs, 56, who announced last week that he would be stepping down as CEO of Apple for medical reasons, not only persuaded Pausch that he couldn't live without a Mac — when he had only months to live — but billions more.

And not just computers. According to The New York Times, consumers have purchased more than 314 million iPods, 129 million iPhones, 29 million iPads and can't wait for the next sleek and sexy apparatus introduced by the bluejeans and black turtleneck-clad icon.

Yet, for Jobs, who has been variously described as an innovator and visionary as well as a control freak and egomaniac, fearless risk-taking was key.

As a teenager, Jobs phoned William Hewlett to request equipment for a school project. Not only did he get the parts, but a Hewlett-Packard summer job offer as well.

In 1975, he walked away from a dream job designing video games for Atari to expand his mind in India. "One of the two or three most important things," Jobs told author John Markoff, "I had done in my life."

In 1976, he sold his only means of transportation — a VW van — to build the Apple I with Steve Wozniak in a garage.

The laid-back advertising by Apple seems to reflect the minimalist appeal of every Apple product. Madison Avenue must have done a double take when a series of advertisements in which a stubbly guy in denim and hoodie — "I'm a Mac" — bests, in a mocking yet modest manner, the clean-shaven suit who represents Windows PC.

Some 65 such commercials ran from 2006 to 2010 on television and the World Wide Web. The creators at TVWA/Media Arts Lab wisely traded on the fanatic loyalty most Apple aficionados hold for Jobs.

How loyal? Just check out the blogosphere where the responses to Jobs' recent resignation revelation ranged from radio host Bob Boilen's ("All Songs Considered") contrast with the break up of The Beatles to a profound disturbance in the Apple fanboy force on Facebook to a lighthearted tweet by by @9GAG that reads, “Steve Jobs’ text was meant to say, ‘I reign as CEO of Apple.’ Damn you Autocorrect.”

Apple stock dropped 5.5 percent after Job’s pronouncement.

NPR’s Linda Holmes credits the culture at Apple to the company’s ultimate success---not just the impressive profit margin or the glittery technical accomplishments but the unquantifiable “coolness” factor that may well disappear with the demise of Jobs.
 
“Google may have been the company that has popularized the slogan ‘Don’t be evil,’” writes Holmes, “but Apple is the company that used its cultural position to persuade its users most effectively that it wasn’t evil.”
 
“That's why Apple can refuse to implement an element as common as Flash,” she adds,  “and can straightforwardly say, in effect, ‘We’re keeping this from you for your own good, and eventually, you’ll be better off.’ And it works.”

Steve Jobs, in fact, is the culture at Apple. In a 2005 commencement speech at Stanford, the college dropout advised, “You have to trust in something---your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. This approach has never let me down, and it has made all the difference in my life.”

Jobs’ gaunt appearance has spurred over-the-top speculation. Pausch wouldn’t have criticized Jobs for keeping mum.

We do know that Job’s pancreatic cancer was diagnosed and treated in 2004. His controversial liver transplant in 2009 and medical leave---the third in 7 years---last January bought him even more time.

On August 27, 2008, Bloomberg updated its 17-page obituary of Jobs---and inadvertently published it in the process. Jobs’ recent resignation revelation will undoubtedly fuel preparation of hundreds of “just in case” death notices. Perhaps a few words of wisdom from Pausch might prove useful to those who would sum up the life of Steve Jobs.

“I’ve never understood pity and self-pity as an emotion,” explained Pausch. “We have a finite amount of time. Whether short or long, it doesn’t matter. Life is to be lived.”

That’s exactly what Jobs is trying to do.



  © 2011 Scripps Newspaper Group — Online

August 30, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: "I'm a Mac" advertisement, Achieving Your Childhood Dreams, Apple, Apple fanboy, Bloomberg, Bob Boilen, Damn You Autocorrect, Facebook, Google, LInda Holmes, pancreatic cancer, Randy Pausch, Steve Jobs, William Hewlett

THE 21ST CENTURY'S OWN SOCIAL PHENOMENON

Facebook-popularity

Published on August 17, 2011 in the Ventura County Star

You know there has been a shift in the zeitgeist — when it shows up in a commercial.

The boob tube was still in the experimental stage in 1928, but its potential as a salesman became evident on the September cover of Radio News. A man in an elegant smoking jacket is seated in an overstuffed chair — his eyes glued to a screen built into an ornately carved breakfront. The headline: "Soon."

"Mad Men," the AMC series about a 1960s advertising agency, juxtaposes major social transformations — advances in civil rights, the burgeoning women's movement and landmarks in space exploration — with Madison Avenue men (and women) who stimulated our longing for Lucky Strikes, Heineken beer and bouffant hair styles.

During the '70s, McDonald's opened a window on an African-American daddy who cheerfully takes responsibility for braids and breakfast, at a time when more and more women were entering the workforce.

During the '80s, the infamous "Me Decade," Pantene treated us to "Don't Hate Me Because I'm Beautiful."

A 21st century generation gap is being documented by a Toyota Venza ad in which a young lady bemoans the fact that her folks are not as involved in Facebook as she is. "My parents are up to 19 friends now," she laments — then mouths "so sad."

According to Nielsen, social networking is the most popular online activity — exceeding sending emails, browsing the Internet or playing games. In the interest of full disclosure, I spend 15 to 20 minutes a day on Facebook — in the pursuit of academic research, of course.

Facebook, which posts statistics as up-to-date as possible, now boasts more than 750 million active users — with half logging in on any given day. The average user claims 130 friends.

"The new tools of social media," writes Malcolm Gladwell in The New Yorker, "have reinvented social activism." From Tunisia to Egypt to Libya, as governments continue to teeter and tumble, the voice of a new generation fortified by Facebook and Twitter, appears to be opening doors for democracy.

Yet, is a Facebook friend the same thing as a real friend?

Probably not — but Facebook friends can prove invaluable.

First, they can be a real support in time of grief, according to Time magazine. "People the world over can post messages, photos and videos, and specialized sites offer interactive forums in which the bereft can chat with therapists and with one another."

Second, they can be the only source of information during a disaster. Victims with mobile phones were able to communicate via Facebook from the site of the Japanese earthquake and tsunami. The same can be said of storm and flood refugees in the U.S. South and Midwest.

Third, Facebook friends are a big reason that "it's a small world after all." This is especially true with respect to getting the word out about needs as major as a bone-marrow transplant or as minor as a pair of reading glasses.

I got the chance to find out jut how small the world is when I received an email via the Facebook page I set up for the Port Hueneme Friends of the Library.

The English grammar was a little sketchy but the message was quite clear. A Japanese individual named Kazuo Ohashi wanted to determine the "recent status" of an elder sister living in Port Hueneme.

I forwarded his email to Police Chief Kathleen Sheehan who dispatched Sgt. Chris Graham to do a "welfare check" on Ms. Mitsuyo Sawday. He found her house "clean and orderly" and Mitsuyo "a lovely hostess." Her health was good, other than coping with a tracheotomy, which, apparently, was not of recent origin.

The officer, according to Sheehan, "was too much of a gentleman to ask her exact age, but she seemed to be getting around and caring for herself just fine." In the notes they wrote each other, he discovered that Mitsuyo and her sister Fumiko Mikuni usually communicated via fax but Mitsuyo had been a little lax of late. She promised to remedy the situation that day.

Almost immediately I received another email from Mitsuyo's 65-year old brother reading, "Thanks so much for your prompt and deep kindness. I will respect that local community is very strong in USA. Thank you so much again Kelley-San and everyone."

Needless to say, Kazuo is now my friend on Facebook. He's since reported that his home, facing the U.S. supply base in Sagamihara City, was untouched by earthquake, tsunami or radiation.

Kazuo visited the "Friendly City by the Sea" 16 years ago. The vacation was nice, but it was his Facebook experience that convinced him Port Hueneme really does live up to its motto.

No, this isn't a commercial. Just an observation — about another shift in the zeitgeist.

August 16, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Facebook, Friendly City by the Sea, Heineken, Kathleeen Sheehan, Lucky Strikes, Mad Men, Madison Avenue, Malcolm Gladwell, McDonalds, Nielsen, Pantene, Port Hueneme, Port Hueneme Friends of the Library, Radio News, Toyota Venza

SAND SCULPTURE IDEA TAKES SHAPE AT HUENEME BEACH

20100821-192621-pic-332435292_t607 Published in the August 3, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

You probably associate Port Hueneme with either Naval Base Ventura County — home of the Fighting Seabees — or as the site of the fourth-largest deepwater port on the West Coast. You may not realize, however, that Port Hueneme beach sand has been certified, by a bona fide geologist, no less, as perfect for constructing sand sculptures.

Actually, Hueneme Beach Park itself should be considered a 20-acre sand sculpture, varying in size and shape from year to year. When the Navy built the east jetty at the harbor, it interrupted the flow of sand to Hueneme Beach while also creating a corrosive eddy current that scours away 1.25 million cubic yards of sand every year.

The Army Corps of Engineers is mandated by law to replenish the sand, which is usually pumped out of a trap west of Channel Islands Harbor every two years.

This year, the third annual city of Port Hueneme Sand Sculpture Contest is scheduled for Aug. 21 — giving out-of-towners something else to do from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., in addition to visiting Hueneme Beach Festival vendors, grooving to the bands, visiting the port or touring Ventura County's only lighthouse.

Donna Breeze hatched the sand sculpture idea while brainstorming various strategies to keep Hueneme Beach from remaining "the best-kept secret in Ventura County." Since her family has always enjoyed digging in the sand, she figured a competition on the beach east of the pier might provide the perfect introduction to "The Friendly City by the Sea."

Attendance at the first two contests, however, was disappointing. After a painful post-mortem, three number-boosting decisions were made.

First, there will be no entry fee. The contest is free — whether you are a sand sculpture virgin or an award-winning professional.

Second, the publicity blitz for the event will extend far beyond posters and free media. This year, according to Lisa Donley, Port Hueneme director of Recreation and Community Services, not only will there be announcements in all local newspapers, including The Star, "we will run a TV commercial on KEYT from Aug. 16 to 21" and media sponsors "Gold Coast Broadcasting and Cumulus Broadcasting ... will read PSAs beginning the week of the event."

Third, there will be a teaching demonstration. Professional painter and sculptor Dennis Shives entered last year's contest with an elaborate bullfrog (complete with textured skin) lounging on a giant lily pad. What impressed Breeze, however, about Shives, was the way he quietly pitched in, as officials roped off dozens of 14-foot by 14-foot shoreline plots at the crack of dawn.

His frog didn't grab the grand prize, but Shives wasn't disappointed — he just made the rounds complimenting the other entrants.

Breeze figured the reason most people balked at entering the contest was inexperience. So for those who want to learn how to sand sculpt or to glean a few tips from a professional, Shives was hired to conduct a three-hour demonstration on Saturday, the day before the contest, from noon to 3 p.m. He specializes in getting sculptors of all ages to tap into their imaginations as they use everyday tools from home to create masterpieces in the sand.

Shives, a natural-born storyteller, possesses an infectious sense of humor and has been passionate about art since childhood. He loves living in Ojai but spent ten mind-blowing summers in Alaska, where he learned how to fish for salmon, carve ivory and produce bear story paintings.

One of his favorites depicts a farmer lighting smudge pots in an avocado grove — with Ojai's iconic Chief Peak in the distance. The farmer is so preoccupied, however, he misses a bevy of avocado-loving brown bears warming themselves around a fire.

Shives also invented a bat or angel wing-festooned belly swing to simulate flying for little kids, and a wind-powered bubble machine, which may, weather permitting, bathe Hueneme Beach in bubbles on Aug. 20.

When I asked Shives what he was going to craft for his demonstration, he remained mum. He customarily depends on his most recent experience to jump-start the creative process. All I can tell you is that his last crowd-pleaser was a colossal sand car. The sculpture portrayed a vehicle traveling so fast around a corner that G-forces curve the automobile into a C-shape.

Shives told me that a little boy approached the sculpture, studied it seriously, and then confidently announced, "It's a Bentley."

Even though a total of $2,000 in prize money will be given away, Breeze isn't interested in Port Hueneme becoming just another stop on the professional sand sculpture tour. She insists that the contest remain family-friendly.

An amazing sand sculpture exists inside each of you. All you have to do, according to Shives, is just let it out. See you in Port Hueneme.

A sand-sculpting contest will again be part of the activities at the 13th annual Toni Young Hueneme Beach Festival set for Aug. 20-21. For more information about the sand-sculpting event (scheduled for Sunday, Aug. 21) go to http://www.huenemesand.com. For questions, email Donna Breeze at info@huenemesand.com.


August 02, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: Dennis Shives, Donna Breeze, Fighting Seabees, Friendly City by the Sea, Hueneme Beach Festival, Huenme Beach Park, Naval Base Ventura County, Port Hueneme Sand Sculpture Contest, Port of Hueneme, The Army Corps of Engineers

THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME IN CALIFORNIA

Published in the July 20, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star


Mapofjefferson1 If Thomas Jefferson had had his way, the 163,695-square mile landmass that is the state of California would have consisted of five equilateral rectangles with no meandering curves or unexpected projections.

We will never know if all of Ventura County would have fit in one of his Golden State squares, since Jefferson's proposal never gained much traction, but we do know that Ventura County farmers would not have been able to realize $1 billion yearly from local water sources alone.

Even though Southern California needed Northern California (at least, its water) when the state Legislature put division to a vote in 1859, 75 percent of Southern California voters, convinced that they were being ignored and unfairly taxed by state legislators, favored making their dry and sunny neck of the woods a new state.

Fortunately, the Civil War seriously distracted the powers that be in Washington and nothing came of So Cal's drive to divide.

Yet, since California acquired statehood in 1850, there have been at least 27 attempts to cleave America's most populous state. Californians got most serious about splitting up in 1941, when Lassen, Modoc, Siskiyou and Del Norte counties in Northern California got the urge to merge with Curry County in southern Oregon. The spanking new state was to bear the name of our third president.

Their reason for secession was reflected in the official Seal of the Great State of Jefferson. The founding fathers of Jefferson, convinced that an abundance of copper, gold and silver, dense forests and unparalleled fishing would enable their state to become "self sustainable," chose a gold miner's pan with two Xs painted in the center to denote being "double crossed" by both Sacramento and Salem.

Point your browser to Jefferson State to hear from those still patiently waiting for Jefferson, (the current incarnation incorporates seven Oregon and 12 California counties) to become our 51st state.

Quarrels over politics, religion, culture and natural resources resulted in state boundaries as jagged as a leaf's edge. For example, the 49th parallel was chosen as the northern border of Minnesota, North Dakota, and Montana to ensure access to the Great Lakes.

Although most people associate the Mason-Dixon Line with the War between the States, it was employed to settle the clash between the British colonies of Maryland and Pennsylvania/Delaware over a charter that placed the booming Philadelphia within Maryland's borders.

If, after the 14-member California Citizens Redistricting Commission  sets new boundaries for the congressional, state Senate, state Assembly and state Board of Equalization districts, and Simi Valley, Moorpark or Thousand Oaks ends up voting with Los Angeles County, the dislocated municipality, too, might feel — 250 years later — Philadelphia's pain.

While John Q. Public has only one criterion — what's best for me — the commission is bound by six guiding principles: equal population, compliance with the U.S. Voting Rights Act, contiguity, communities of interest, compactness and, where possible, locating two Assembly districts in one Senate district. Note that these criteria are also prioritized.

Since equal population comes first — it's all about the math. An Assembly district is limited to 465,674, Senate district to 931, 349 and congressional district to 702,905.

The population of Ventura County, as of 2010, is 823,318, which means not only will it be mathematically impossible to gather all 10 cities into a single congressional district but it will also be mathematically impossible for state Assembly districts not to spill over as well.

As if the commission's redistricting assignment weren't complicated enough if merely confined to Ventura County — there are 58 counties in California and all are bellowing for the commission's attention and bawling to stay intact.

The ballot results of the Voters First Act of 2008 (passed by 50.83 percent) and California Congressional Redistricting Initiative of 2010 (passed by 61.3 percent) indicate that a majority agrees that the blatant gerrymandering, political stagnation and lack of competition that characterized Golden State politics had to go. The last straw for voters was the Democratic-controlled Legislature penciling in districts that protected all incumbents in 2001.

While not everybody will be happy after July 28, (the commission's deadline), we can trust that the commission, after weighing our polite and persuasive feedback, will have done its level best to group California's voting communities by geography, ethnicity and economic interests.

Moreover, we can be thankful that commission members are not folks who "allow" — no, make that — "demand" that voting records and party registration shape the new maps.

Only Thomas Jefferson would insist that California consist of five equilateral rectangles with no meandering curves or unexpected projections. Just think, had he had his way with the rest of these United States, none of us would be able to recognize states by shape.

They would all look the same.

More online
Are you smarter than a third grader?

Try this

July 19, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: California Citizens Redistricting Commission, California Congressional Redistricting Initiative of 2010, Civil War, Jefferson State, Mason-Dixon Line, Thomas Jefferson, Ventura County, Voters First Act of 2008

BAD TEACHER BELONGS AT BACK OF CLASS

Bad_teacher_movie_poster_01 Published in the July 6, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

She's no Mr. Chips. I'm talking about the foul-mouthed Elizabeth Halsey (Cameron Diaz) in "Bad Teacher," who goes into education for all "the usual reasons: short hours, summers off and no accountability."

The pot-smoking, flask-toting gold-digger is so totally obsessed with augmenting her bra size to trophy wife specifications that she connives all manner of embezzlement schemes to achieve said goal.

Her lesson plan consists of showing "Stand and Deliver," "Dangerous Minds" and "The Great Debaters" while she snoozes or nurses a hangover. She also foists her responsibilities off on colleagues who possess far bigger hearts for their students than she does.

The R-rated black comedy may have been intended as the lucrative demon spawn of "Bad Santa," but moviegoers aren't seeing it that way. Terry Zwigoff's 2003 Christmas offering, in which Billy Bob Thornton plays an alcoholic Kriss Kringle, raked in big bucks ($136 million) yet ticket-buyers seem to be staying away from "Bad Teacher" in droves.

Perhaps the critical difference is that Santa Claus doesn't exist but bad teachers do — and are responsible, at least, in part for the 30-year decline in the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) as well as America's lousy (in comparison to other industrialized countries) rankings in math and science.

On the first day of class, I ask my students to supply adjectives that describe "a good teacher." I dutifully record their answers on the white board, only occasionally asking for clarification with such attributes as "accessible" (Does that mean 24/7?) or "understanding" (Would such a teacher allow you can turn in a paper late because of a fight with your boyfriend?) or "entertaining" (What exactly does "entertaining" look like?).

The list never holds any surprises: "prepared," "knowledgeable," "competent," "punctual," "focused," "fair," "respectful," "appeals to different kinds of learners," "creative," "passionate," "funny," and "leaves emotional baggage at home." Apparently, some teachers share too much information — on a daily basis.

Next question: "What makes a good student?" It doesn't take long before sharp undergraduates crack the code. The very same adjectives that delineated their ideal teacher are now showing up on the board defining ideal students as well.

Last question: "Can you learn anything from a bad teacher?" Somebody always says, "You can learn what not to do."

"Allow me," I say, "to tell you about Miss Fern."

She was my high school calculus teacher, at a time when not much was known about Alzheimer's. She would get terribly lost — unable to explain the illegible equations she scrawled on the blackboard and would dissolve into tears.

When we complained to the principal, we were told that under the terms of her contract, if Miss Fern didn't finish up the semester, she wouldn't be able to collect a pension. It was up to us, he advised, to improvise.

Perhaps his solution wasn't really fair but it certainly was profitable — life lesson-wise. We soon came to realize that, as a group, we could teach each other calculus, and by walking in Miss Fern's spindly spike heels, we could learn compassion as well.

So what would Miss Halsey be able to teach? Not only could her self-absorption, shallow sexuality, callous materialism, addictive personality and lack of empathy add up to a stunning what-not-to-do role model but she could also allow her students to more easily recognize her self-destructive characteristics in themselves.

Narcissism is the new black. Unfortunately many of us are wearing too much of it. According to such sociologists as San Diego State's Jean Twenge, University of Georgia's W. Keith Campbell, Notre Dame's Christian Smith and University of Kentucky's Nathan DeWall, young people, these days, are suffering from a veritable epidemic of narcissism — even more widespread and entrenched than previous generations.

Why widespread and entrenched? Certainly such mega-popular social networking sites as Facebook and Twitter (just ask former Congressman Anthony Weiner) as well as the instant celebrity afforded by "win-at-any-cost" reality and talent shows are working overtime to fuel narcissism across the nation.

"Bad Teacher," however, remains a very cynical look at public education when America needs to recognize and reward good teachers more than ever. While all may not rise to the level of a Jaime Escalante, Louanne Johnson or Professor Melvin Tolson, sharing their uplifting stories on the silver screen may, once again, inspire our best and brightest to become educators.

There's no "Goodbye, Miss Halsey" at the end of the film. Ironically, instead of being fired, Halsey is promoted, while Amy Squirrel (Lucy Punch), who is outstanding in the classroom, is banished to the worst school in the state.

"Bad Teacher" does offer a parting lesson. Instead of attempting to weed out bad teachers after the fact — via test scores, third-party evaluations, or threatening to close down schools — why not identify them as freshmen?

It's so easy — just look into their hearts.



July 08, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: " "Dangerous Minds, " "The Great Debaters, "good teacher, "Stand and Deliver, bad teacher, Cameron Diaz, former Congressman Anthony Weiner, Narcissism, Notre Dame's Christian Smith, San Diego State's Jean Twenge, University of Georgia's W. Keith Campbell, University of Kentucky's Nathan DeWall

WHEN IT COMES TO SCANDAL IT'S A MAN'S WORLD

Kissinger_Henry "Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac," said Henry Kissinger, and the Nobel laureate, 56th secretary of state and unlikely sex symbol — linked to Jill St. John, Marlo Thomas and Samantha Eggar — ought to know.

At the Washington Press Club in 1972, Kissinger defended his reputation as a "secret swinger" by noting that although Gloria Steinem announced she "is not now and never has been a girlfriend," he wasn't about to give up. "After all," he wisecracked, "she did not say that if nominated she would not accept, or if elected she would not serve."

Kissinger was single when he carried on with his bevy of Hollywood beauties. Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, R-Calif. former Gov. Mark Sanford, R-S.C., former Gov. Eliot Spitzer, D-N.Y., former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., and former President Bill Clinton were not.

"I'm telling you," Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich., told The New York Times after the Weiner debacle, "every time one of these sex scandals goes, we just look at each other, like, 'What is it with these guys? Don't they think they're going to get caught?' "

In "A Matter of Judgment not Morality," published by the Miami Herald, Leonard Pitts Jr. concludes, "Women are possessed of something rare among men. It is called a 'brain.' Evidently, that organ tells them that when your private life is public record, when you live in a news cycle that is all intrusive, all the time, it might be wise to keep that other organ zipped."

Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs Torie Clarke recently observed on ABC's "This Week" that female politicians who are "seen as more honest, more sincere, as harder working" than men are gaining a distinct advantage among voters.

Indeed, as the world struggles to emerge from the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression, the International Monetary Fund — the institution at the heart of the global economic system — is moving to replace Dominique Strauss-Kahn (who was forced to resign after being accused of sexually assaulting a hotel housekeeper) as managing director.

Apparently, Christine Lagarde's gender is giving her the edge, even though IMF leadership has been largely French for the past three decades and Mexico's candidate, Agustín G. Carstens, appears, at least on paper, to be better qualified for the job.

Only a handful of minor scandals involved women in public office in America — either amounting to long-term love affairs quickly confessed and without political consequence (U.S. Rep. Helen Chenoweth and Charlotte, N.C., Mayor Sue Myrick) or chalked up to a last-minute campaign smear that backfired on the opponent (South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley).

So why do so few feminine politicos make the list of cheaters?

First, female elected officials do more and have more to do. Kathryn Pearson's (University of Minnesota) research on Congress demonstrates that compared to men, women introduce more bills, participate more vigorously in key legislative debates and give more of the one-minute speeches that open each daily session. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand sums it up for NPR's Cokie Roberts: "You're in the middle of diapers and bottles and bills and votes and markups, how could you possibly think about doing anything else?"

Second, politics remains, for the most part, a man's world. The Center for American Women and Politics has compiled data showing women currently hold only 16.6 percent of the 535 seats in Congress and 23.5 percent of the seats in state legislatures. Further, America boasts only six female governors and, of the top 100 big-city mayors, merely eight are women.

Third, along with shorter lines to the ladies room comes more scrutiny by the media. Since so few females throw chapeaus into the political ring, the spotlight is on them 24/7. "There are certain men that the more visible they get, the more bulletproof they feel," writes the author of "Why Women Should Rule the World," Dee Dee Myers. "You just don't see women doing that; they don't get reckless when they're empowered."

"The shorthand of it is that women run for office to do something, and men run for office to be somebody," Rutger's Debbie Walsh told The New York Times. "Women run because there is some public issue that they care about, some change they want to make, some issue that is a priority for them, and men tend to run for office because they see this as a career path."

There is no evidence that "Henry the Kiss" kept chasing skirts after 1974 when he married Nancy Maginnes, a leggy blonde aide to New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller.

His second most notable quote, however, provides sensible counsel to politicos of both genders. "Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes," he quipped. "There's too much fraternizing with the enemy."

June 22, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: Agustín G. Carstens, Christine Lagarde, D-N.C., D-N.Y., D-N.Y., Debbie Walsh, Dee Dee Myers, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, former Gov. Eliot Spitzer, Gloria Steinem, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Henry Kissinger, House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Jill St. John, Kathryn Pearson, Leonard Pitts Jr., Marlo Thomas, Mayor Sue Myrick, N.C., Nancy Maginnes , President Bill Clinton, R-Calif. Gov. Mark Sanford, R-Ga., R-Mich, R-S.C., Rep. Anthony Weiner, Rep. Candice Miller, Samantha Eggar, Sen. John Edwards, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, Torie Clarke, U.S. Rep. Helen Chenoweth and Charlotte

Kelley: Gender Question creates a "Storm"

Streamimage Published in the June 8, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

My Greatest Generation parents were crazy about the ornately framed prints of Thomas Gainsborough's "Blue Boy" (1770) and Thomas Lawrence's "Pinkie" (1794) that hung in their bedroom.

When I studied art, however, I discovered that Gainsborough also captured a similarly posed adolescent male on canvas around the same time — only he decided to clothe the second model in a "pretty-in-pink" costume.

Experts claim, with both "Pink Boy" and "Blue Boy," Gainsborough was paying homage to the 17th century Flemish artist Anthony Van Dyck.

"Pink Boy," even though executed as well as "Blue Boy" was, for some reason, unceremoniously relegated to relative obscurity while appreciation for "Blue Boy" has carried well into the 21st century.

Do art lovers have a problem with a young boy dressed in pink? The Associated Press recently ran a story about a Toronto couple who torched quite a controversy when they refused to identify the gender of their newborn. Kathy Witterick, 38, and David Stocker, 39, contend that little "Storm" should have the right to decide his or her sexual identity.

Storm, the third child behind two "on-the-record" boys (Kio and Jazz), was born in a pool of water at home. The baby announcement, delivered via email, said: "We've decided not to share Storm's sex for now — a tribute to freedom and choice in place of limitation, a stand up to what the world could become in Storm's lifetime."

The couple, subsequently besieged by reporters once their revelation went viral, fired off a statement on May 27 that read in part, "that the whole world must know what is between the baby's legs is unhealthy, unsafe and voyeuristic. We know — and we're keeping it clean, safe, healthy and private (not secret!)."

The parents maintain that there's nothing abnormal about Storm's genitalia but admit that they've been wounded by snide remarks directed toward their older boys for preferring pink and purple apparel, sometimes the occasional dress and/or long, braided hair.

This brings to mind two questions: 1. Should children have the ultimate say in choosing their gender? 2. No matter how well intended, does this experiment exemplify political correctness run amok?

I am having trouble with the idea of "choosing" one's gender unless our customary visual approach results in an ambiguous conclusion. While it is true that accepted gender-based roles do tend to limit children to behavior that fails to take into account their individual preferences and/or abilities, on the other hand, according to "Barbie Against Superman" (Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies), normative pressure via the socialization process at home or school and informational pressure from the media or peers do tend to exert an almost irresistible force as well.

During the past two centuries, wholesale discrimination against American women existed because men convinced themselves that women were physically, mentally and/or emotionally inferior — not just different — inferior. That was wrong.

Did you know that more than 400 women passed themselves off as males in order to fight during the Civil War? As to being judged by a jury of one's peers, Georgia was that last state to grant females jury rights — the date was Dec. 21, 1953. Women were shut out of institutions of higher education then and are still not occupying the Oval Office now.

Most would agree that gender differences seem to result from both nature and nurture. If distinctions between the sexes were merely biological, education would be impossible and behavior could never be changed. If distinctions between the sexes were merely environmental, our children could be more easily Stepfordized but what's the joy in that?

Back to the blue and pink color-coding, Claudia Brush Kidwell and Valerie Steele in "Men and Women: Dressing the Part" report, "The current pink for girls and blue for boys wasn't uniform until the 1950s."

Indeed, the June 1918 issue of Ladies' Home Journal observed, "There has been a great diversity of opinion on the subject, but the generally accepted rule is pink for the boy and blue for the girl. The reason is that pink being a more decided and stronger color is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl."

The bad news is that gender stereotypes continue to persist. The good news is that most are not carved in granite. Today, women are doing better in college than men, glass ceilings are being smashed and panty hose are becoming an endangered species. Women are wearing pants — even as they campaign for the highest office in the land.

I just wish Hillary would stay away from the color pink.

© 2011 Ventura County Star. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

June 07, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: Anthony Van Dyck, Claudia Brush Kidwell, David Stocker, Jazz Stocker, Kathy Witterick, Kio Stocker, Storm Stocker, Thomas Gainsborough's "Blue Boy", Thomas Gainsborough's "Pink Boy", Thomas Lawrence's "Pinkie", Valerie Steele

PARKING LOT PROBLEMS? THERE'S AN APP FOR THAT TOO!

Kathy-Bates-Fried-Green-Tomatoes Published in the May 25, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

My favorite scene from “Fried Green Tomatoes” (1991) has Evelyn (Kathy Bates) circling the Winn Dixie parking lot for what seems like forever.  Finally she eyes an elderly shopper preparing to leave. As she waits patiently for his ‘56 Caddie to pull out, a couple of big-haired girls in a lipstick-red Volkswagen sneak in from the opposite direction and poach her parking place.  

 

When Evelyn points out the lapse in etiquette as politely as a menopausal Southern belle can, they blow her off with a “Face it lady, we are younger and faster.”
  
The technical term, I believe, for the emotional maelstrom that subsequently engulfs Evelyn is “parking lot rage,” which manifests with Bates repeatedly ramming the VW while screeching an enigmatic battle cry.

When asked, “What are you doing?,” Evelyn smirks, “Face it girls. I’m older and have more insurance.”
 
We all can relate to the frustration Evelyn feels, but what can be done?

Donald Shoup, a professor of urban planning at the University of California, Los Angeles, reported to the New York Times that drivers in his study, who were searching for parking in a 15-block district in Los Angeles, drove an estimated 950,000 miles a year---equivalent to four trips to the moon. That’s a whole lot of $4 gasoline.

Further, exhaust emitted while prowling for parking may not seem like much but I strongly suspect its toxic chemicals may significantly intensify the irritated state in which we find ourselves while in pursuit of the parking lot pot-o-gold.

Finally, while we may resent a paucity of parking, we resent paying for it even more.  
I don’t suppose you celebrated at your house, but folks in Oklahoma City recently marked the 75th anniversary of the parking meter and its inventor, Carl C. McGee.

As a newspaper publisher, McGee observed that the shortage of downtown parking seemed to equal the number of selfish proprietors leaving personal vehicles in front of other shops in order to free up spaces for their own patrons. The city legislated time limits on parking, but enforcement proved costly and inefficient.

McGee came up with a manufacturable model in 1935 and the coin-operated parking meter was subsequently adopted by cities across the fruited plain.

According to Jeff Brieley of the Oklahoma History Center, even though the device made its appearance during the depths of the Depression, customers didn’t kick up much of a fuss over a nickel an hour---the equivalent today (with inflation) of $1.

Flash forward to the city of Ventura, and, based on newspaper accounts, letters to the editor and a Ventura County Tea Party leader, you might believe that the 318 parking meters recently installed downtown are threatening to shutter dozens of Main Street enterprises.  

Yet the city website claims downtown Ventura boasts more than 2,500 free public parking spaces located just down the street from the most popular shops and restaurants. The point, in addition to raising revenue for the cash-strapped city, is the same as it was in 1935 Oklahoma City---to free up as much conveniently located parking as possible. If you are determined to walk only a few steps; you pay for the privilege.  

Parking lot rage, on the other hand, is like the weather. We all talk about it but nobody---save those who routinely pray to the parking gods---ever do anything about it. But this is the 21st Century, dear readers, and, it should come as no surprise---there’s an app for that.

As of April, the system in San Francisco which relies on wireless sensors buried in streets and floors of city garages, can, within seconds, tell the owner of an iPhone which one of 7,000 metered parking spaces or 12,250 spots in city garages is open for business.

Bear in mind that San Francisco is a metropolis in which all parking is paid parking and the city simply can’t create new places to park. The Transportation Department and the Federal Highway Administration is backing the $20 million SFpark project.
 
Los Angeles has likewise partnered with a company called Streetline---which introduced similar projects on New York’s Roosevelt Island, in Fort Worth and at the University of Maryland---to set up an SFpark-like system in West Hollywood.
 
Perhaps if the Kathy Bates character had owned a smart phone, she wouldn’t have been forced to take out her fury on a vulnerable vehicle. Can’t you just see a future “Fried Green Tomatoes” remake? As Evelyn speeds toward the parking spot located by her iPhone, she finds herself rear-ended by a multi-tasking teenager in a Prius. The young lady may have been inching up the aisle, old school, but she was distracted---updating her Facebook status.  
 
Face it people, technology, no matter how hip and happening, does have its limits.

May 24, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Carl C. McGee, Donald Shoup, Facebook, Fried Green Tomatoes, Jeff Brieley, parking lot rage, SFpark, Streetline, Ventura

Power Point for California League of Women Voters Convention Speech

Display_media For a copy of the Power Point entitled "100th Anniversary of the Women's Vote in the Golden State," that was delivered to the California League of Women Voters Convention at a luncheon on May 13, 2011, click below.

Download 100thAnnspeech

May 14, 2011 in Power Points of Speeches | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: "100th Anniversary of the Women's Vote in the Golden State", California League of Women Voters Convention

CIVIC ALTRUISM LINKS THE PAST AND THE PRESENT

50_82_1068c Published in the May 11, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

"Words mean more than what is set down on paper," contended Maya Angelou. "It takes the human voice to infuse them with deeper meaning."

This weekend, the California League of Women Voters will be celebrating the 100th anniversary of the two dozen or so words granting the vote to California women at their annual convention in Ventura.

In 1876, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, contemplating the Great Seal of the State of California, remarked that while the Roman goddess of wisdom dominated the symbol, "the position of real women" in the Golden State "inspires no corresponding admiration or respect."

Three little words — "votes for women" — may not seem like much, but in January 1911, according to the Sacramento Congressional Record, they constituted "the biggest question of the political world today."

Despite statewide sweeps by Susan B. Anthony and Dr. Anna Howard Shaw, the California women's suffrage referendum of 1896 went down by a staggering 13,000 votes. While some blamed the 1890s depression and others, the liquor industry, Sarah Severance fingered Sacramento for the thrashing.

According to the suffragette from San Jose, "California ought to teach women better than to put faith in politicians. Our work should be with the voters, each woman making a few unbelievers her special mission."

When a second opportunity arrived 15 years later, Severance's strategy proved a winner.

California women had been grass-roots organizing themselves for decades — not politically, they would insist, but rather under the umbrella of "civic altruism."

Such issues as temperance, good government, school reform, the eight-hour workday, white slavery and juvenile courts were discussed over tea and homemade cookies by white middle-class women's clubs, university or professional women's associations, women's unions or church groups.

These brave bands of sisters, mobilized via the technology of the day, got the word out in ways as individual as the microclimates interspersed throughout the 750-mile-long state.

The "each-woman-making-a-few-unbelievers-her-special-mission" tactic was so successful that despite 3,000 fraudulent votes cast, California women wrested suffrage from an all-male electorate in 1911.

Speaking of "civic altruism," there are literally thousands of volunteers laboring at hundreds of nonprofits in Ventura County these days. "Nonprofits," notes the Ventura County Foundation, "are on the front line of an ongoing debate in our society — between the role of private and public wealth." Each nonprofit isolates a need unmet by government and, depending on the talents and expertise of its volunteers, tailors a unique plan of attack.

One such group is the California Literary Arts Society. The grandiose-sounding name might suggest a bevy of eccentric-looking females clucking over the value of the written word between sips of Earl Grey. That image, however, is nowhere close to reality.

While these ladies, who prefer champagne, do bring book festivals and authors' workshops to Ventura County, they also share a passion for young people — especially those who find themselves on the wrong side of the law.

Last year, the California Arts Society published "Voices from Behind the Wall," the memoirs of 14 teenagers residing at Juvenile Hall.

The book was a collaborative effort that not only capitalized on the literary expertise of CLAS project director Mary Embree and her volunteers Anne Escobedo and Jill Forman, but also depended on 1) the staff manning the Boys and Girls Club of Greater Oxnard and Port Hueneme Clubhouse at Juvenile Hall, and 2) the employees of the Ventura County Juvenile Facilities. Both were required to buy into the healing potential provided by writing.

As Chief Deputy Alan Hammerand observed: "An amazing level of insight and talent are revealed in these stories. Through this project, these minors, who are often misunderstood and ignored, have given voice to their thoughts and feelings."

Hammerand also noted in the book's foreword that the various contributors were ultimately able to correct course with respect to self-destructive attitudes and behaviors. Finding a safe place to articulate their emotions played no small part in their turnaround as well.

While "life-changing" has become a cliché these days, no other adjective as accurately describes the transformation this modest 118-page tome exacted on both the authors and writing gurus who helped stimulate and shape (grammar only) messages ranging from recounting horrific childhoods to sharing hard-won life lessons.

Flashing back to the 20th century, early suffragettes in California grasped that juveniles differed from adults regarding cognition, analysis and decision-making abilities.

They hadn't yet collected a stack of modern scientific studies speaking to "impulse control," yet they knew, perhaps intuitively, that young people should be held to a legal standard separate from adults.

In 1903, due to their exhaustive efforts, these ladies made California the seventh state to enact a juvenile court act — even before they, themselves, could vote on such a matter.

And that is essentially the way change — deep and meaningful change — comes. One voice at a time — until every voice is heard.





May 10, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: " Mary Embree, "Voices from Behind the Wall, Alan Hammerand, Anne Escobedo, Boys and Girls Club of Greater Oxnard and Port Hueneme, California League of Women Voters, California Literary Arts Society, civic altruism, Dr. Anna Howard Shaw, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Jill Forman, Maya Angelou, Sarah Severance, Susan B. Anthony, Ventura County Foundation, Ventura County Juvenile Facilities

BRIAN BRENNAN: GREAT CHOICE TO REPRESENT VENTURA COUNTY ON COASTAL COMMISSION

BBrennan_at_promenadePublished in the April 27, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

It's safe to say that Brian Brennan is the only member of the California Coastal Commission who owns a vacation home in the Bahamas. It's also safe to say that he won't be flying to his "Rastafarian surf shack" on the island of Eleuthera as often as he'd like.

When I asked him why Eleuthera, he just chuckled. Apparently, this lush tropical isle, located 50 miles east of Nassau, is blessed with wide, pink-sand beaches, ancient coral reefs and multihued flora and fish. The water near the shore remains spa-warm and, according to an American astronaut, the crystal-clearest in the Caribbean.

Brennan, 59, comes by his love of islands honestly. Galway, on the Emerald Isle, is the birthplace of this congenial soul. If you look closely, you can see the map of Ireland on his face. Brennan became an American citizen in 1966 and always finds a way to reside within surfboard-hauling distance of an ocean.

I'm still reeling from the one and only time I glimpsed the Ventura City Council member (1997 to present) and senior executive aide to Ventura County Supervisor Steve Bennett (2008 to present) in a suit and tie. Brennan's usual year-round attire consists of an Aloha shirt, sandals and shorts.

On April 14, Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. gave Brennan the nod to occupy the Coastal Commission elected official slot representing the South Central Coast. A Ventura County resident has not held the seat since Port Hueneme Mayor and City Councilman Dorill B. Wright retired in 1994.

Initially, Wright took the post in 1976 and served until Gov. Brown replaced him with county Supervisor John Flynn in 1981. When Gov. George Deukmejian took office in 1982, he bid Flynn adieu, and brought back Wright, who served for a dozen more years.

When I asked Brennan what he would say if a cocktail party guest wanted to know what a coastal commissioner does — his response was short and sweet. Brennan sees himself as one of 12 coastal planners.

The California Coastal Commission was established by voter initiative in 1972 (Proposition 20) and later chiseled in granite via the California Coastal Act of 1976. Interestingly, Brennan spent an entire month collecting signatures from residents of Cardiff-by-the-Sea for the landmark legislation.

Having a representative on the Coastal Commission is particularly critical to Ventura County. While we don't have Hollywood hotshots wanting to restrict access to the beach, we do have 43 miles of shoreline to steward.

In addition, Ventura County boasts two recreational craft harbors, the fourth largest deep-water port on the West Coast and Naval Base Ventura County as well as two aging power plants, constant sand erosion, threats to marine habitat and water quality issues.

While not exactly beachfront property, the Coastal Commission also signs off on the removal of Matilija Dam, which would both improve fish habitat and renew sand deposits on local beaches.

Brennan's vetting process was grueling. First, not-so-easily-impressed Sacramento staff grilled Brennan, which seems odd given his extraordinary environmental credentials and the fact that Gov. Christie Todd Whitman appointed him to the Environmental Protection Agency's national advisory council on environmental policy.

Next, Brennan met with the new, improved version of Jerry Brown. Apparently, since his 1975-to-1983 stint as governor, Brown has managed to hack away the armor that once safeguarded his Moonbeam idealism.

Brennan found it easy to relate to the current hands-on problem-solver (who finally mastered governance after eight years as mayor of Oakland) and who, like Brennan, now values balancing private-property rights with environmental concerns. Still, the hour Brown and Brennan spent brainstorming topics ranging from German philosophers to Catholic popes to Linda Ronstadt must have been pretty trippy all the same.

Brennan is a singularly modest man in a line of work fueled by ego and ambition. When asked about his greatest political accomplishment, the founder of the local chapter of the Surf Rider Foundation and the director of BEACON (Beach Erosion Authority for Clean Oceans and Nourishment) contends that no politico does the job all by himself.

Officials on a power trip often forget that without majority backing, even the best of ideas can end up circling the drain. Brennan, who possesses a seemingly effortless ability to build consensus, can count to seven.

Supposedly, no human being strode the beaches of Brennan's island until Europeans seeking religious independence arrived in 1648. "The Eleutherian Adventurers," as they called themselves, named their little corner of paradise after the Greek word for "free."

Brennan's schedule will be too jam-packed to do anything more than daydream about his tropical getaway for now. Wish him well. Like the first inhabitants of Eleuthera, Brennan has definitely set out on an adventure. Let's also hope he keeps our little corner of paradise just as free.

April 26, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (2)

Technorati Tags: Beach Erosion Authority for Clean Oceans and Nourishment, Brian Brennan, California Coastal Act of 1976, Coastal Commision, Dorill B. Wright, Eleuthera, Galway, Gov. Christie Todd Whitman, Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Gov. George Deukmejian, John Flynn, Jr., Matilija Dam, Naval Base Ventura County, Port of Hueneme, Steve Bennett, Surf Rider Foundation, Ventura City Council

IT'S WHAT'S MISSING THAT MATTERS IN PRESIDENTIAL BIOS

Change-we-can-believe-in Published in the April 13, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

A recent Andrew Johnson biography published by Annette Gordon-Reed, who brought home a Pulitzer for her ground-breaking research on Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings, argues that the 17th president actually advocated restoring white dominance to the South and envisioned (his words) "a white man's government."

Yet, the White House website,  which offers one-page summaries of all 44 chief executives, paints President Johnson, "an honest and honorable man," as a hapless victim.

"Arrayed against him," reads the narrative, "were the radical Republicans in Congress, brilliantly led and ruthless in their tactics. Johnson was no match for them."

It would seem that these official biographies more closely resemble the barefaced presidential boosterism served up in pre-1950 Tinsel Town biopics rather than the "warts-and-all" exposés we have come to expect these days.

While such modern-day historians as Doris Kearns Goodwin and Michael Beschloss contend that the 350-word accounts on the White House site aren't blatant lies, they do hold that some narratives fail the sniff test because selected facts are omitted.

For example, George Washington, who is introduced by the White House as a precedent-setter of the first order, is not identified as the owner of 316 slaves. In fact, any indication that, of the first 12 presidents, all, save John Adams and John Quincy Adams, were slave-owners, is conspicuously absent.

Andrew Jackson's page says virtually nothing about his harsh treatment of native Americans. Lyndon Johnson's story does not include his ill-fated decision to send ground troops into Vietnam. Ronald Reagan's narrative makes no mention of the Iran-Contra scandal. William Jefferson Clinton's bio doesn't name Monica Lewinsky. George W. Bush's entry fails to include a reference to Hurricane Katrina.

While Barack H. Obama's account boasts that "his story is the American story — values from the heartland, a middle-class upbringing in a strong family, hard work and education as the means of getting ahead, and the conviction that a life so blessed should be lived in service to others," there is not one word about the detrimental effect of his presidential candidacy shattering all previous fund-raising records.

Obama's $750 million overwhelmed John McCain's finance efforts by more than two to one. Furthermore, not only did Obama manage to amass a war chest exceeding George Bush's 2000 total by a factor of four but compared to Clinton in both 1992 and 1996, Obama's advantage rose to a factor of nearly eight.

Experts are predicting now, 20 months out from the election, that the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates will end up raising-then-spending an unprecedented $1 billion each.

Everett Dirksen supposedly said, "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking about real money."

One billion dollars will buy you approximately 714 spanking new Tomahawk missiles. If you are willing to fritter away your kid's inheritance on a yacht, you can take home the 536-foot Eclipse that boasts two helicopter pads, 11 guest cabins and two swimming pools. You could also choose to foot the bill for yourself and 39 of your closest friends onboard the Soyuz as you journey to and from the International Space Station.

On a more humanitarian note, however, $1 billion would pay the salaries of 20,000 teachers, feed nearly 1 million Americans for a year, or buy health care insurance for 2 million children.

As long as the Supreme Court equates campaign funding with free speech and/or recognizes corporations as citizens, no campaign finance reform is possible.

Yet, some of us still recall that Sen. Obama's official website (before it was removed) read: "Obama supports public financing of campaigns combined with free television and radio time as a way to reduce the influence of moneyed special interests."

Yet, six months before the election, Obama made the fateful decision not to participate in the federal public presidential campaign finance plan — the fund created by taxpayers checking off the optional $3 donation box on their tax returns. The soon-to-be 44th president, even though he had given his word, looked at the odds and found himself bowing to the bang of big bucks instead of standing to support his precious principles.

In the introduction to "Andrew Johnson," Annette Gordon-Reed wrote, "History is not just about the things we like or the people we want to love and admire... it is about the events in the past that have mattered greatly to a given society and its culture."

Moneyed special interests currently control politics — there is no doubt of that. As Gordon-Reed spelled out in her book, "It is a useful, though often maddening, thing to see the choices that were available to people in the past and why they chose one route over another."

Could Obama have changed the landscape with respect to campaign finance reform? Unfortunately, he never gave it a chance.


April 12, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: Andrew Jackson, Andrew Johnson, Annette Gordon-Reed, Barack H. Obama, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Everett Dirksen, George W. Bush, George Washington, John Adams, John McCain, John Quincy Adams, Lyndon Johnson, Michael Beschloss, Ronald Reagan, Sally Hemings, Thomas Jefferson, William Jefferson Clinton

"NUCLEAR BOY" DRAWS ON HUMOR TO EASE KIDS' FEARS

 Nuclear-boy-cartoon-e1300396324388 Published in the March 30, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

Mention the name "Mr. Rogers," and most folks just smile.

While Fred McFeely Rogers' halting speech pattern, lace-up sneakers and closet of wool cardigans became fodder for skits on "Saturday Night Live," the Presbyterian minister-cum-indelible American icon (March 20, 1928 – Feb. 27, 2003) was best known for teaching patience, tolerance and compassion to American kids.

Based on child development and early education principles, "Mister Rogers' Neighborhood" — the longest-running children's program on PBS — racked up 895 episodes. In a typical program, after warbling "Won't You Be My Neighbor?", Rogers might interact with live guests, take a field trip to a neighborhood business, converse with puppets or conduct an earnest conversation with his preschool viewers.

Big on expressing emotions, Rogers didn't shy away from addressing the frightening images of a carnage-heavy Vietnam War, raucous student protests or bewildering assassinations (Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy) bombarding American living rooms in 1968 when "Mr. Rogers" first aired. He believed that the feelings of small children were being overlooked as their parents struggled to grapple with an increasingly violent world on the boob tube.

Various attempts by newscasters to make the complicated catastrophes dogging the Fukushima nuclear complex in Japan comprehensible to John Q. Public — ranging from soliciting the "in-my-humble" opinions of such scientific rock stars as Cham Dallas, Richard Lester and Michio Kaku to the Internet site "A Layman's Intro to Radiation" to Jeremy Bogaisky's suggestion in Forbes Magazine that viewers catch episode No. 144 of "The West Wing" — crowded the airwaves.

Parents, who already face the thorny task of sifting through a 24/7 stream of news stories competing for their undivided attention, seem unaware of the palpable fears that are presently plaguing their young children. American television likewise remains clueless.

Yet, just two weeks ago, some of us stumbled upon "Nuclear Boy," a crudely drawn animated clip from Japan that explains the nuclear reactor predicament. The author serves up flatulence — time-tested to appeal to the sniggerer in all of us — as an impertinent metaphor for radiation.

The short (4:34) children's video introduces a square-headed stick figure who complains he has been suffering from a nasty stomach ache ever since the big earthquake. Nuclear Boy or Genpatsu-kun doesn't mean to make any trouble, but the buildup of gas in his tummy is wreaking havoc on his immediate neighbors as he subjects them to frequent farts. So far, he has managed to "hold in his poo" (preventing a nuclear meltdown) but if he fails to remain constipated he "would surely ruin everyone's day!"

"We measured the stinky-level around Nuclear Boy," the subtitles read. "Thankfully, it wasn't that stinky, so we figured he had just passed some gas."

Courageous technicians attempting to contain the disaster are depicted as Nuclear Boy's doctors, laboring around the clock to provide enough medication (seawater and boric acid) to get him healthy again.

"Since he passed gas a few more times, there are some smelly neighborhoods," the video continues, "but don't worry, the odor won't last long and people living farther away won't even notice the smell."

The film also refers to "Three-mile Island Boy" and describes the disaster at Chernobyl as "diarrhea" that "went all over the place."

"Nuclear Boy" ends with a plea for prayer that peace will soon return to the people of Fukushima prefecture. "That's the least we can do," the video admonishes, "for receiving Nuclear Boy's energy for all these years."

The cartoon was based on dozens of tweets by Tokyo resident and artist Hachiya Kazuhiko. While his home was untouched by the earthquake and the tsunami, he realized that his offspring were dazed and confused by media accounts of the potentially calamitous situation to the north.

He tried to explain — in bursts of 140 characters each — the series of events that, in the future, would become the defining moment in his youngsters' lives.

Another Twitter account holder screen-named ChiiChoco turned the tweets into a script for a manga (Japanese comic book). Other collaborators, who chose to remain nameless, added the animation, spoken lines of dialogue and lively banjo music. The finished product was shown on Japanese television as a way to ease dread in the youngest segment of the population. Currently, more than 1.2 million people have viewed the video on You Tube.

"When I was a boy," Fred Rogers once confessed, "and I would see scary things in the news, my mother (who hand-knitted each of her son's signature sweaters) would say to me, 'Look for the helpers. You will always find people who are helping.'"

What would Mr. Rogers have to say about "Nuclear Boy?" Even given the scattering of scatology, I am confident it would receive his unqualified blessing — and a smile.

March 29, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: " "Nuclear Boy, " 1968 assassinations, " flatulence, "West Wing, "Won't you be my neighbor, Cham Dallas, Chernobyl, ChiiChoco, Forbes, Fukushima nuclear complex, Hachiya Kazuhiko, Jeremy Bogaisky, Mr. Rogers, radiation, Richard Lester and Michio Kaku A Layman's Intro to Radiation, student protests, Three-mile Island Boy, Vietnam War

REMEMBERING THE REV. PROFESSOR PETER J. GOMES

BooksGomes_Peter_2 Published in the March 16, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

Many of us have stumbled across a book that either changed our minds or our hearts.  Few of us, however, get the chance to spend an hour with the author. For me, the book was "The Good Book: Reading the Bible with Mind and Heart" by Peter J. Gomes.

Hearing that Gomes, the pastor to Harvard University for the past 41 years, met his maker two weeks ago, prompted me to retrieve the tape of our radio interview in 1997.

I couldn't agree more with Henry Louis Gates, Jr., who wrote for The New Yorker that Gomes "was a large, warm and mischievous soul, who contained a multitude of identities, each worn with a certain roguish sense of irony."

To say that the Rev. Professor Gomes, born May 22, 1942, was a complex and complicated individual is a glaringly obvious understatement.

He was a 68-year-old African-American whose mother came from genteel wealth, an ordained Baptist minister who sounded a great deal like a Lutheran, a card-carrying Republican, a celibate homosexual and a charismatic preacher who wrote academically about Elizabethan Puritanism as well as popularly about the Bible.

His "The Good Life: Truths That Last" and "The Scandalous Gospel of Jesus: What's So Good About the Good News?" were also best sellers.

When I posed the question, "If you had five minutes with God and could ask Him (or Her) anything you want, especially something that troubles you about the Bible, what would you ask?," Gomes didn't hesitate. "Does the Bible," pronounced Gomes in his booming basso profundo, "represent your very best effort at communicating with us?"

Then he added, tongue firmly planted in cheek, "If it is, then I am worried. Because if a human being sat down and wrote the Bible, it would come out a much more efficient and rational and tidy book."

I'd like to believe that when Gomes went home on Feb. 28, God said, "You know that question you asked me back in 1997? You didn't listen hard enough for my answer. I said, 'Keep reading, son.'"

Back then, however, Gomes employed his hypothetical query to underline the serious mistake we make when we attempt to limit God to the literal content of 66 books. As one of the leading national voices against intolerance, Gomes continued to make the case that almost any interpretation of morality, no matter how irresponsible, can be read into the pages of the Bible.

"The Bible alone is the most dangerous thing I can think of," he told me. "You need an ongoing context and a community of interpretation to keep yourself honest."

Gomes' "The Good Book" flew off the shelves during the "Needy Nineties" (his nickname) when the hunger for spirituality in America was far less marked than today as the world finds calamities of biblical proportion rapidly becoming the norm.

Currently, many feel the need to swap the 10-minutes-after-eating emptiness that accompanies the incessant acquisition of possessions for the spiritual fulfillment resulting from reaching out to others. They are opting to exchange the so-called "good life" (in the materialistic sense) for a life that is good.

Gomes' experience with privileged Harvard students attending a secular institution of higher education taught him, firsthand, that America's young people, then and now, "are literally hungering and thirsting for righteousness."

Even though today's millennials have been described as narcissists — coddled by doting parents and self-absorbed by social networking — this generation, even as teens, volunteer in their communities at rates unprecedented by previous peer groups, including the World War II cohort that epitomized self-sacrifice.

Possessing a terrific sense of humor, Gomes was invited to trade quips with Comedy Central's Stephen Colbert on Sept. 15, 2008.  I suspect that anybody who spent any time with Gomes remembers laughing a lot.

My last question, "So how does somebody, who knows better than to take himself seriously, end up at Harvard?" got the heartiest guffaw of the night from my guest — yet his comeback was particularly telling about the man himself.

"That's the ultimate paradox, it seems to me," replied Gomes. "For me to end up at Harvard and to be here for so long is proof, in my view at any rate, that God has a sense of humor. God puts us in very strange places to do very strange and unexpected things."

Gomes, who prayed at the presidential inaugurations of both Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, changed his registration to Democrat to vote for Deval Patrick during the 2006 Massachusetts gubernatorial primary. When he learned of Gomes' death, Gov. Patrick observed, "He taught so many that faith is not just what you say you believe, but how you live."

Gomes' books changed my mind. Meeting him changed my heart.

March 15, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: "Needy Nineties", "The Good Book: Reading the Bible with Mind and Heart", "The Good Life: Truths That Last", "The Scandalous Gospel of Jesus: What's So Good About the Good News?", Deval Patrick, Harvard University, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., millennials, Peter J. Gomes, Stephen Colbert

IT’S ELEMENTARY, DEAR WATSON, YOU ARE JUST THE NEXT KILLER APP

Jennings_rutter_watson Published in the March 2, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

Robert Metcalfe was still a computer science Ph.D. student at Harvard when he was asked to prepare an introductory booklet about the fledgling Advanced Research Projects Agency Network (ARPANET) for an October 1972 conference in the nation’s capitol.

The 26-year-old wasn’t yet aware that a BBN Technologies programmer named Raymond Tomlinson was not only writing, on his own time, the code for the first “killer app,” namely e-mail, but would also turn the @ sign into a global icon.

The red-bearded Metcalfe’s brochure, however, did include 19 other cool applications.

While Metcalfe was taking 10 executives from AT&T on a virtual tour of the ARPANET demonstrating the aforementioned apps, his interface message processor unceremoniously crashed. The smug smirks on the faces of the Ma Bell suits, who considered this forerunner to the net in America merely an unreliable toy that would never impact the commercial world, angers Metcalfe to this day.

Fast-forward to February 14-16, 2011, when a different machine captured America’s attention. A three-day “Jeopardy!” challenge pitted past champions Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter against a supercomputer named for IBM’s first president, Thomas J. Watson.

The size of 10 Sub-Zero freezers, Watson was programmed to question answers in the classic “Jeopardy!” manner. A task force of IBM engineers based in Westchester County, New York, over four years, scanned a cosmos of data into its vast 15 trillion-byte memory including encyclopedias, literary classics, mathematical or scientific formulae, as well as the names of every historical figure and Hollywood luminary.

Finally, Watson, unlike his opposable-thumbed opponents, was not only advantaged by the ability to process 500 gigabytes of information (equivalent to 1 million books) each second but its machine learning process likewise allowed the computer to profit from incorrect responses or learn from its mistakes.

“Any seasoned horse handicapper,” according to a St. Petersburg Times editorial, “easily could have predicted the outcome of the race.” Worries about a “takeover of human society,” it added, are “premature.”

In fact, Watson doesn’t even come close to passing the Turing test for artificial intelligence. I knew 2001’s Hal, and Watson is certainly no malevolent Hal.

Although Watson erred more often than his rivals---when asked what grasshoppers eat, it confidently answered, “What is kosher?” and claimed that the Russian word for “goodbye” was “cholesterol”---its speed compensated for its slip-ups.

The answer royally flubbed by Watson---which hardly caused his human competitors to break a sweat---occurred in Final Jeopardy. The category was U.S. cities and the clue was “Its largest airport is named for a World War II hero; its second largest, for a World War II battle.” The correct response was “What is Chicago?,” yet Watson offered, “What is Toronto?”

You have to wonder how many viewers actually groaned out loud at such a glaring gaffe. Okay, maybe not those who are employed as baggage handlers at airports across the fruited plain.

The contestant with the plasma screen visage and sing-song voice may have wiped up the floor with “Jeopardy!’s” (human) finest, yet Watson will never be able to dish up such nerdy witticisms as Jennings’ homage to “The Simpsons,”---”I, for one, welcome our new computer overlords”---jotted under his Final Jeopardy response.

So should folks who get paid big money for their expertise, fear being replaced by a Watson-type computer?

Instead of thinking “either/or,” perhaps the best course to consider is “human-plus-machine.” IBM is currently partnering with eight universities to explore possible applications. Potential seems highest in such spheres as technical or customer support, online searches, law, medicine, and investments, but any field that requires data-based decisions could benefit.

For example, a medical center might use Watson to better diagnose disease. Since a patient’s symptoms may suggest a myriad of possibilities, the advantage would be its ability to scan the medical literature faster than Gregory House, M.D.---who takes 60 minutes, minus commercials, to cycle through at least four incorrect diagnoses. Since the supercomputer possesses a voting algorithm, it can suggest the best possible answer, but a human, after evaluating the computer’s findings, would ultimately be “the decider.”

In Time Magazine, Robert Weber, a vice president at IBM, reported that even though Watson’s technology is a “boon” for the legal profession, “it won’t ever replace attorneys; after all, the essence of good lawyering is mature and sound reasoning.”

Let’s turn back to Metcalfe, who, these days, is enjoying considerable renown as a distinguished Internet pioneer. He must be laughing up his cashmere sleeve as 21st Century (smart) phone companies battle tooth and nail to get our business---a business that wouldn’t even exist if the ARPANET had failed as miserably as their AT&T predecessors predicted nearly four decades ago.

As to anger, Dr. Metcalfe, isn’t success totally the best revenge?

March 01, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (2)

Technorati Tags: ARPANET, AT&T, Brad Rutter, IBM, Ken Jennings, Raymond Tomlinson, Robert Metcalfe, Thomas J. Watson, Turing test for artificial intelligence, “human-plus-machine” , “Jeopardy!”

Unseen Hand at Work in Fluoride Flap

Alien-hand-5 Published in the February 16, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star


According to Calvin Trillin, "In modern America, anyone who attempts to write satirically about the events of the day finds it difficult to concoct a situation so bizarre that it may not actually come to pass while his article is still on the presses."

When it came to "Dr. Strangelove or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb," released in 1964, Trillin was proved right — in spades.

As Peter Sellers conjured up the signature touches that defined his portrayal of the title character — the black glove that paid homage to Fritz Lang's "Metropolis" (1926) or the heavily-accented German voice mimicking Stanley Kubrick's real-life photographer friend Arthur Fellig — he suddenly realized that Dr. Strangelove, as a former Nazi, might have adopted America as the new fatherland but at least a part of him — particularly the arm that saluted "Mein Fuhrer" — might possess a fascist mind of its own.

It should come as no surprise that the neurological disorder typified by an appendage that refuses to behave would became known as the "Dr. Strangelove" or "alien hand" syndrome. As reported by the London Times, "The sufferers find that, despite their best intentions, the hand will pick up objects such as scalding cups of coffee or steal ice cream and other food from friends." Of course, it was only a matter of time before the TV scriptwriters for "House, M.D." would feature the exceedingly rare affliction.

The other satiric target in "Dr. Strangelove" proved more controversial. The fluoridation of water, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention named as one of the 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century, has, for more than five decades, been credited with the "Look, Ma — no cavities" smiles on American school children.

Fluoridation began in 1945, when a Newburgh, N.Y., study reporting significantly fewer cavities in residents of communities with higher levels of fluoride occurring naturally in the water was employed along with some heavy-duty lobbying by well-intentioned dentists. Yet, a number of holdouts, especially in rural areas, adamantly opposed any sort of "collective" (read communist) government action that might bring about unintended consequences.

The water supply was chosen as the delivery system in order to level the playing field for those who couldn't afford dental care and who, courtesy of cavities, might suffer, in the words of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, from "pain, poor nutrition and dysfunctional speech, as well as a lack of concentration, poor appearance, low self- esteem and absenteeism."

The Gen. Ripper character in "Dr. Strangelove," however, wasn't exaggerating the opposition view when he said, "A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice."

Choice was, indeed, important to foes of fluoridation. Since 1966, such activists as Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, Fluoride Action Network and Farmers Against Fluoride have successfully reversed mandatory water-fluoridation laws in hundreds of communities across the nation.

The film also made reference to a possible multiplier effect when Gen. Ripper adds, "Mandrake, do you realize that in addition to fluoridating water, why, there are studies under way to fluoridate salt, flour, fruit juices, soup, sugar, milk ... ice cream. Ice cream, Mandrake, children's ice cream."

Just last month, in a nearly unprecedented about-face, U.S. federal health officials were forced to admit that Americans have been getting too much of a good thing. Not only has fluoride been unintentionally introduced into hundreds of food products via processing, but it's also been added to such dental products as toothpaste and mouthwash as well as being prescribed as a supplement and/or applied to children's teeth by dental professionals.

Dental fluorosis, or spots on children's teeth that clearly signify fluoride overexposure, has skyrocketed. Dental fluorosis is now present, according to government studies, in 41 percent of 12- to 15-year-olds. On Jan. 7, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced plans to lower the recommended level of fluoride by as much as 50 percent.

This unanticipated change in policy was propelled by a fresh review of the science by the Environmental Protection Agency, which now contends that "the prolonged, high intake of fluoride may increase the risk of brittle bones, fractures and crippling bone abnormalities" — in addition to mottled choppers.

Irony is the use of words to convey the direct opposite of their literal meaning. For example, President Merkin Muffley (Peter Sellers) in "Dr. Strangelove" says, "Gentlemen, you can't fight in here. This is the war room!"

Trillin weighed in on irony as well: "Math was my worst subject because I could never persuade the teacher that my answers were meant ironically."

On the other hand (perhaps the alien hand?), those who continue to defend universal fluoridation might just be dealing in irony.

February 15, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: Alien Hand Syndrome, Arthur Fellig, Calvin Trillin, Citizens for Safe Drinking Water, dental fluorosis, Dept of health and Human Services, Dr. Strangelove, EPA, Farmers Against Fluoride, fluoridation of water, Fluoride Action Network, Gen Ripper, House, irony, MD, Metropolis, Peter Sellers, Stanley Kubrick

EQUAL TREATMENT FOR BRAIN TRAUMA INJURY VICTIMS

Giffords-kelly-holding-hands-2 Published in the February 2, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

His hand is muscular and bronzed. Her hand looks almost jaundiced; It's so sallow. There are tubes snaking around her wrist and a ribbon of gauze guards an intravenous line. The grainy cell phone photograph documenting the ten lovingly intertwined digits of astronaut Mark Kelly and U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., was snapped on Jan. 9, 2011, the day after she was shot point blank in the head at a Tucson constituent event that ended up slaughtering six and injuring 12.

As Claire O'Neill of National Public Radio so eloquently pointed out at the time, "Over the past few days we've been inundated with crime scenes, memorials and mugshots. But this is the first photo of Giffords' family. A very large, national issue suddenly becomes more human; conversely, at the snap of a shutter, an intensely personal moment goes public. A small detail, the right gesture, suddenly represents something more universal."

On Jan. 24, 2011, not only did most members of Congress and other political leaders sport black and white ribbons, but the Arizona congressional delegation left an empty seat to honor their fallen colleague.

Further, President Barack Obama paid tribute to Rep. Giffords at the beginning of his State of the Union remarks and urged Americans to let the recent tragedy in Tucson stand as a reminder that "each of us is a part of something greater — something more consequential than party or political preference."

Less than three weeks later, Giffords' prognosis was upgraded from "serious" to "good" and the plucky politician was transferred to the Memorial Hermann TIRR facility to begin a meticulously tailored program that includes cognitive rehabilitation therapy — a long, expensive process in which the patient essentially rewires her brain so that she can again conduct basic life tasks such as reading books, following instructions, and recalling information.

While traumatic brain injuries have been labeled the "signature wounds" of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, ProPublica and National Public Radio report in their "Brain Wars" series hundreds of thousands (the Pentagon reports 188,000 service members with brain injuries since 2000) are being denied the same treatment as currently being afforded Rep. Giffords.

Tricare, which is essentially a private-sector healthcare company contracted by the Pentagon to cover nearly 4 million active-duty military and retirees, is just saying "no." Despite pressure from Congress and recommendations by top military/civilian brain specialists, medical researchers and respected physicians' associations, Tricare refuses to pay, claiming a lack of scientific justification for the treatment.

To make its case, Tricare is relying on a recent study conducted by the Pennsylvania-based ECRI Institute that found insufficient evidence to support the therapy and which, according to NPR News and ProPublica, directly contradicts extensive research conducted by both the Pentagon and the National Institutes of Health.

Now Tricare had a pretty good idea of what ERCI was going to say about cognitive rehabilitation therapy — the second time around. Three years ago, ECRI conducted a similar assessment for Tricare that likewise cast serious doubts on the support for therapy's effectiveness.

Although Tricare heatedly denies cost as a factor, it seems obvious that the company's overriding concern is the high price tag — $50,000 per patient.

While 100 percent of the 400,000 troops estimated to have suffered traumatic brain injuries in war zones would not need a full-scale program, even 25 percent could set Tricare back a cool $5 billion.

No wonder the company is trying to distract critics by blurring the distinction between mild and severe brain injuries when it comes to assessing the treatment's benefits. Tricare seems to contend that if cognitive rehabilitation therapy isn't necessary for everybody with a brain injury; then it is not necessary for anybody.

On Jan. 21, 2011, Sen. Clair McCaskill, the chair of the Committee on Contracting Oversight, announced a full-scale investigation into Tricare's decision to deny cognitive rehabilitation treatment of traumatic brain injuries to troops. In a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, she wrote, "We owe it to our brave service members to find the truth so that all returning service personnel can benefit from the best brain injury care this country has to offer."

As you read the "Brain Wars" series, concentrate on the photos. Look for the upraised palms of service members who are simply seeking a helping hand from those for whom they laid their lives on the line without hesitation. Nobody is wearing ribbons on their behalf. Nobody extols their virtues in a political address. Nobody, save immediate family members, is actually paying attention at all.

Do this and perhaps you can cause a very large, national issue to suddenly become much more human. Our compassion for victims of brain injuries shouldn't just stop with a member of Congress — no matter how plucky.


February 01, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: Claire O"Neill, cognitive rehabilitation therapy, D-Ariz., Defense Secretary Robert Gates, ECRI, Iraq and Afghanistan wars, Mark Kelly, Memorial Hermann TIRR facility, National Public Radio, President Barack Obama, Pro Publica, Sen. Clair McCaskill, State of the Union, Tricare, Tucson, U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords

TREE PEOPLE AT HOME IN GREAT FALLS, MONTANA

 Treepeople Published on January 19, 2011 in the Ventura County Star

Great Falls, Mont., should not hesitate to toot its own horn. In 1805, the five waterfalls from which the city takes its name figured prominently in the Lewis and Clark Expedition. From 1950 to 1970, the city held the distinction of being the most populous in Montana.

Furthermore, not only is Great Falls the location of the world’s shortest river (Roe) but it plays home sweet home to a university, the C.M. Russell Museum Complex, and the Great Falls Voyagers minor league baseball team, which underwent a name-change from the White Sox to honor general manager Nick Mariana’s historic filming of a UFO floating eerily over third base in August 1950.

Yet, despite all the abovementioned allure, the primary reason we made the 1,000-mile trip (each way) earlier this month was to spend time with our one-and-only grandkid. When we arrived, a couple of feet of snow blanketed the ground, the temp hovered around zero and a Christmas tree, surrounded by mounds of glittering paper-wrapped presents, twinkled in the living room. While we both received dozens of very thoughtful gifts, our favorite came from Max, who insisted, much to our surprise, we accompany him to the Paris Gibson Square Museum as his guest.

Now Max adores all things science (“MythBusters” being his favorite TV show) and we’ve escorted him, here in Southern California, to a natural history museum, an aquarium, an auto museum and even a rock-and-minerals exhibit, but we never dreamed art would be a turn on for a 9-year-old in love with Hot Wheels and the iPod Touch.

It seems last year Max was enchanted by the field trip his class took to the Paris Gibson, an impressive sandstone structure in the center of town that previously served as a public school for more than eight decades. While he paid perfunctory attention to the oil paintings, watercolors and drawings in the museum, what seemed to impress him most and what he strove to share with us were Lee Steen’s “tree people.”

Fortunately for Max, we got in for free. Farmers Union Insurance underwrote the cost of admission so that no art lover would be turned away. While Max paid proper respect to headliner Theodore Waddell, a nationally regarded painter who captured the flora and fauna of the Rocky Mountain region with modernist sophistication, the Steen collection kept calling his name.

Lee Steen, a native of Horse Cave, Ky., was clearly self-taught and his work would be catalogued under the heading “Outsider Art” — much like Grandma Prisbey’s Bottle Village in Simi Valley or the primitive paintings of Grandma Moses. According to his biography, in 1942, Lee and twin brother Dee, relocated to Roundup, Mont., where they lived on property populated by Lee’s tree sculptures, odd mechanical assemblies and outlandish animal figures.

While Steen didn’t “sculpt” his statues in the traditional sense, the curve of a branch or the knot in a tree trunk seemed to suggest a specific subject to which Steen would add “found materials” (or what you and I would call “trash”) to complete the effect. According to the exhibit’s signage, “inverted coffee cans and flowerpots became hats; beer tabs and bottle caps formed eyes; and twigs sprouted magically into handlebar moustaches.”

Steen’s creations not only provided a popular roadside tourist attraction during the next 30 years, but Lee persuaded the folks driving by to stop and give him five or ten dollars for one of the so-called “cowboys” he constructed. Apparently, he subscribed to the Frank Zappa school of creativity. Zappa, who with the Mothers of Invention released 60 highly profitable albums, wrote, “Art is making something out of nothing and then selling it.” Steen didn’t die a millionaire, but then he never fretted about his next meal either.

With Steen’s death in 1972 and the subsequent sale of his property, the unique environment that set off his work ceased to exist. Fortunately, the fundraising of John Armstrong and Jim Poor preserved Steen’s constructions for future generations in a permanent attraction that now wows such grade-schoolers as our grandson.

Just a few decades ago, the public school system here in the Golden State was the envy of the nation but today, budget cuts deny our school kids much more than field trips or art programs. Currently, we can’t do much about teacher layoffs, shortened semesters and crowded classes, but we can schlep our kids to a local museum or two — Ventura County boasts 26 of them. Who knows, parents might even enjoy the experience as much as their offspring do.

So, when it comes to horn-tooting, Great Falls should feel free to give it its all — especially as residents huff and puff their shovels through the never-ending snow.

Oops, did I say that aloud?

January 18, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: C.M. Russell Museum Complex, Frank Zappa, Grandma Moses, Grandma Prisebey's Bottle Village, Great Falls, Great Falls Voyagers, Lee Steen, Lewis and Clark Expedition, Montana, MythBusters, Paris Gibson Square Museum, Roe River, Theodore Waddell

STARRETT KREISSMAN: A DEDICATED ADVOCATE FOR FREE PUBLIC LIBRARIES

 
Sc00023948 Published in the January 5, 2011 edition of the Ventura County Star

This was a week of red-letter days for Starrett Kreissman. Not only did her birthday fall on the 4th and daughter Sonja’s birthday on the 6th, but five years ago, on Jan. 3, Kreissman, a nonsmoker who religiously avoided secondhand smoke, was diagnosed with lung cancer and given 22 months to live.

According to the American Cancer Society, active cigarette smoking causes approximately 85 to 90 percent of all lung cancer deaths. Yet, every year, an estimated 15,000 lifelong nonsmokers likewise succumb.

Kreissman, however, was a high- responder to Tarceva, a drug specifically designed to treat her cancer demographic. While many of her remaining 1,796 days were dedicated to medical matters, the rest were reserved for visits abroad, time with friends, an ambitious house remodel and tending to her garden — a luxuriant sanctuary planted to attract the birds she loved.

The three-decade marriage of Starrett Kreissman and David Dolan began with an introduction by a mutual friend in Modesto. Dolan, an architect, was bowled over by her massive mane of dark curly hair, and she found herself lost in his unbelievably blue eyes. Yet, it was her unrelenting lust for travel and taste for foreign food that Dolan considers her greatest gifts.

Dolan, who never owned a suitcase before encountering Kreissman, soon found himself globe-hopping with a spouse who would instill a hunger to see the world in their daughter as well. Starrett, who visited Paris with Sonja last May, booked every restaurant in advance, much to the delight and further education of her daughter’s adventurous palate.

For much of her life, Starrett was actually known as Jane. Early on, her parents, Bern and Shirley, simply got sick and tired of explaining themselves regarding the name Starrett and chose a variation of her middle name instead. It wasn’t until Dolan made the case for giving her uncommon moniker a second chance, that she became the namesake of Vincent Starrett once again.

Not only was Vincent Starrett born over a bookstore but he also gained renown as an author, bibliographer, Sherlock Holmes scholar and bibliophile who wrote, “When we are collecting books, we are collecting happiness.” What could be a more appropriate name for a woman who would head up the library systems in both Stanislaus and Ventura counties?

When Kreissman took over the Stanislaus system in 1993, budget cuts were threatening closures. She took a page from her mother, a zealous activist for mental health, and opted to fight. Her plan to secure funding via a 1/8-cent sales tax, a first in California, proved a tough sell.

Yet, not only did she persuade Sacramento but also the voters. Her moment of triumph in the accompanying photo says it all. In 2011, her tax is projected to fund 84 percent of the Stanislaus County libraries’ budget. It is hardly surprising that the California Library Association honored Kreissman as Librarian of the Year in 1998.

She was hired by Ventura County to oversee its $6 million-a-year, 15-branch library system in March 1999. She was tasked with the construction of a 10,000-square-foot library in Oak Park and a $2 million renovation of Foster Library in Ventura as well as being expected to smooth communication among a veritable hornet’s nest of contentious factions.

During the next seven years, the creation of a library commission and the careful cultivation of Friends of the Library groups countywide went a long way to check the incessant squabbling. Kreissman, according to Supervisor Kathy Long, “was the right woman at the right time to bring the library system together.” Kreissman was also instrumental in the construction of the new (2007) California Mission-style library in Camarillo.

In June 2002, the city partnered with the Ventura County Library System and the Pleasant Valley School District to submit a $15,621,743 grant application, courtesy of the Library Bond Act of 2000. Long remembers Kreissman personally driving the one-foot high sheaf of paperwork to Sacramento to ensure that it would arrive on time.

Gail Doi, former deputy city manager of Camarillo, first met the 5-foot 2-inch dynamo during the Camarillo Library planning process. What she recalls is Kreissman not only knowing everything there was to know about libraries but being able to read architectural blueprints to boot.

Doi was also impressed with Kreissman’s voracious appetite for reading — consuming nearly a book a day and freely sharing her wealth of knowledge and signature sense of style with other close friends such as Ventura County Harbor Director Lyn Krieger, who will be assisting the family with plans for a memorial service in the spring.

Dec. 2 was her last red-letter day. It was a clear, sunny day in Ventura and I’d like to believe that as she glimpsed her garden one last time, her feathered friends warbled a farewell song — from all of us.



January 18, 2011 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: American Cancer Society, David Dolan, Gail Doi, Kathy Long, lung cancer, Lyn Kreiger, non-smokers, Sonja Dolan, Stanislaus County, Starrett Kreissman, Tarceva, Ventura County, Vincent Starrett

SHEPHERDING NATIVITY PLAY NOT FOR THE MEEK

Sc0001d149 Published in the December 22, 2010 edition of the Ventura County Star

Sister M. Lucy Ann, my first- grade teacher, has been on my mind of late. Last month, I delivered a conference paper in Milwaukee, Wis., the burg we departed about a half-century ago. Since I was back in town, I thought I’d take a leisurely stroll down memory lane.

I can report that our former two-bedroom homestead in Wauwatosa is the same size (cracker box) I remember, that the lady next door still resides next door, and that the walk to St. Jude the Apostle School — a mile each way and across a four-lane highway — is probably beyond today’s elementary school scholar.

As for trudging through snow, check the Wisconsin State Climatology Office for yourself — plenty of white stuff still blankets Milwaukee on a regular basis.

Those were the days when nobody lost sleep over “stranger danger.” Few moms possessed cars but they possessed front porches strategically located along the route to St. Jude’s. Even better, each sported a sharp set of eyeballs and an even sharper tongue — if a kid was found dawdling on the sidewalk instead of transporting him or herself home as promptly as possible. General rule: all mothers were imbued with the authority of one’s own mother.

As far as I knew, Sister M. Lucy Ann had always directed the annual Nativity play. She decided to retire the year after I played Mary. That being said, I’d like to take this opportunity to pay homage to all of the stout-hearted souls (mostly women) who enjoyed enough persistence and patience to tease Luke 2:1-20 out of a group of 5- or 6-year-olds. My Santa cap is off to you!

While older performers have the ability to memorize scripts, little kids must rely on their own words. And there is nothing more winsome than a wee one-— often missing one or two front teeth — mouthing an ad-lib, that, theologically, says it all.

Sister M. Lucy Ann could never forget one Mary who was so involved in dishing up her make- believe dinner that she barely raised her eyes when Joseph (Ralph Spooner) announced their upcoming sojourn to Bethlehem. “Anything you say, Joseph,” she responded — a line that, according to my mother, brought down the house.

In “Seven Stories of Christmas Love,” Leo Buscaglia recounts a spontaneous performance served up by his second-grade class. Not only did they select a hyperactive little boy named Matthew to play Joseph but they also opted, on opening night, to begin Act III in a totally unexpected manner.

Buscaglia asks us to picture his Mary and Joseph asleep on a log. The Angel of the Lord places a plastic doll at Mary’s feet. “They had never done it this way before,” reports Buscaliga. Joseph then delivers a wide yawn, flexes his minuscule muscles and shakes his startled spouse awake with the words, “Mary, Mary, wake up and see what you had during the night!” The entire audience, he recalls, howled.

Sister M. Lucy Ann would be the first to admit that it takes a village to put on a proper pageant. In fact, as she was coaxing her charges into acting out the Gospel story, sewing machines throughout Wauwatosa were whirring out shepherd’s robes, angel’s wings and various get-ups for the animals surrounding the “No Room At the Inn” manger.

As to the logistics involved in mounting a major production — I actually counted 41 freshly-scrubbed faces in our first-grade class picture — somebody had to keep the rest of the cast occupied while the director led the principals through their paces.

While we all knew full well that sister’s knuckle-rapping ruler was secreted away somewhere in the folds of her habit, it was the Mother’s Guild who kept the peace. Not only could they bake Toll House cookies, but they also seemed to know exactly how to make each child feel like he or she was just as valuable as the leads.

That year, a rumor floated around Wauwatosa that Ralph Spooner’s father had captured our Nativity play on 16-mm film but no invitation to see it ever surfaced and being modest Midwesterners, our parents never asked. I do remember Sister M. Lucy Ann cautioning that any child who mugged for the camera would be chalking up a mortal sin for her efforts. I’ll probably spend a couple of years in purgatory for the single photo my mother snapped.

I don’t know who is directing the annual Christmas performance at St. Jude’s now but I wouldn’t be at all surprised to hear this year’s Joseph, when confronted with the “just say no” innkeeper, impulsively whipping out his cell phone and requesting that Motel 6 “keep the light on” for him.

That would have never happened on Sister M. Lucy Ann’s watch. Amen to that, dear teacher, wherever you are.



December 22, 2010 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Leo Buscaglia, Milwaukee, Nativity Play, Ralph Spooner, Sister M. Lucy Ann, St. Jude the Apostle School, Wauwatosa

Christmas Letter 2010

Holiday Greetings to Friends and Family,                                             Christmas 2010

We busied ourselves this year squandering our children’s inheritance. The electronic equivalent of a vacation journal is available @ http://beverlykelley.typepad.com/my_weblog/

Jon and I have always loved messing about in boats. In fact, we pictured ourselves as volunteers on the voyage of some tall ship--until we discovered that experience entailed scaling the rigging. Still, one should never jettison a dream. This January, when we were invited to join three other couples in a bare-boat charter of a 43-foot catamaran (based in St. Martin), we jumped at the chance.

What we relished the most was the way this adventure changed us--not just the new tan lines and extra poundage--but internally as well. There’s something about ocean sailing that is unlike any other experience. The mind tends to totally focus when the world, as you once knew it, is radically reduced to just three components, namely, wind, water and sky. While many aspects of shipboard life were beyond our comfort zones, we were rewarded for opening up to the experience---from schools of flying fish seemingly levitating before the bow to getting up close and personal with a green vervet monkey to being allowed to share a reef with hundreds of black and yellow-striped angelfish.

This summer, we crossed another dream off the “bucket list.” Chloe joined us as we embarked on a month-long exploration of Route 66. While we did consider renting a powder-blue Corvette for about 30 seconds, since Chevrolet isn’t making its bucket seats any bigger, we decided to rent a Mercury Grand Marquis to give a whole new meaning to the term “Easy Rider.” Remember when Reader’s Digest published stories entitled “The Most Unforgettable Character I Ever Met?” On this trip we made the acquaintance of a dozen or more, but Raven Digitalis, who read Beverly’s Tarot cards, remains “most memorable.”

We also took a couple of detours. We visited Nathan, Naomi and Maxwell in Great Falls, Montana as well as Brendan in Fort Worth, Texas. We are pleased to report that our favorite grandson absolutely adores science and looks forward to the weekly experiments he conducts with his father. He also played the piano for Grandpa and the buttons literally popped off Jon’s shirt--he was so filled with pride.

Brendan showed us around his adopted hometown—especially Clark Gardens, which proved to be a veritable oasis with both mercury and humidity hitting the high 90s. He’s still toiling away for Bank of America (formerly Countrywide) and a special project netted him oodles of overtime for many months He’s now within spitting distance of purchasing his own “home-sweet-home.” We look forward to his two week visit here in December.

Lots of upheaval for Angie and Trevor: first, they confronted, with great grace, Angie’s diagnosis of diabetes; next, they relocated to bigger and brighter (courtesy of several skylights) digs in Silver Lake; and just last week, both traded positions at MySpace and Urban Outfitters, respectively, for greener (emphasis on green) pastures at Disney Digital (music division) and Forever 21.

We spent our first Thanksgiving at their home this year. The three-generation crowd included vegans, vegetarians and BYOB (bring your own bird) carnivores, but nobody left the table-groaning potluck hungry.

May your appetite for life be as heartily satisfied during the coming year.

With Love, Jonathan, Beverly, Nathan, Naomi, Max, Brendan, Angie, Trevor and Chloe

December 09, 2010 in Christmas Letter | Permalink | Comments (0)

A SIP OF HUMAN KINDNESS FOR THOSE IN NEED

OHcanton-hs1909 Published in the Wednesday, December 8, 2010 edition of the Ventura County Star

I don’t know what it is about Canton, Ohio. Maybe it’s because Canton’s roots run deep. Incorporation occurred back in 1854. Maybe it’s because Canton sports an exotic moniker. The name originated from what is now Guangzhou, China. Or maybe it’s just something in the water.

Notable natives include a slew of professional football players (Canton is home to the Pro Football Hall of Fame) as well as the 25th President of the United States, talk show hosts as diverse as Jack Parr and Mother Angelica, a raft of musicians and two former Playboy Playmates.

But the Canton resident that interests me the most is Sam Stone. In early December of 1933, however, he surreptitiously passed himself off as Mr. B. Virdot — at least in a newspaper advertisement published in the Canton Repository.

Readers in need — 1933 saw unemployment in Canton spiraling up to 50 percent — were invited by Virdot to wrap up their troubles in a one-page letter. In return, 150 correspondents received a crisp $5 bill (the equivalent of $100 today) which, for many, constituted a life-changing gift.

We know this because Stone’s grandson Ted Gup, a former investigative journalist with the Washington Post and professor at Emerson College, discovered, in 2008, a trunk containing yellowed letters addressed to “Mr. B. Virdot” in his mother’s attic in Kennebunk, Maine.

Gup was not only moved by tales of misery written in perfect Palmer penmanship but was simultaneously buoyed by their expressions of hope. He tasked himself with tracking down the petitioners to uncover, as Paul Harvey used to say, “the rest of the story.”

A missive from Helen Palm Kintz Grant read: “I am writing this because I need clothing. And sometimes we run out of food.” The 14-year-old whose shoes were so badly worn that she cut cardboard from a cereal box to line them, continued, “My father does not want to ask for charity. But us children would like to have some clothing for Christmas.”

Gup’s quest took him across the fruited plain in search of census data, newspaper obituaries, birth, marriage and death records as well as the 500 interviews he conducted to flesh out the family sagas contained in those Depression-era missives.

Grant, the last living letter-writer and now 90, recalled the boost to her family’s spirit Mr. B. Virdot’s (derived from Stone’s sisters’ names (Barbara, Virginia and Dot) five dollars provided. “I took my family out to dinner,” Grant confessed. “And we came here to the Palace to see a show. Then I went next door and bought a pair of shoes. With what was left, I bought some candy.

“For one moment in one forgotten town,” wrote Gup in his recently published “The Secret Gift,” “one man managed to shrink the vastness of the Depression to a human scale.”

This was also a time, according to Gup’s sources, “when people were kinder,” “when the less poor helped the poor,” and “when we were made of better stuff.”

So what really motivated Stone to extend assistance to his neighbors? Gup had known a fun-loving businessman from Pittsburgh as Grandpa. In reality, however, Stone (whose real name was Sam Finkelstein) and his family had managed to flee the persecution and poverty that plagued their native Romania in 1902.

Fifteen years later, bored with rolling tobacco into cigars in Pittsburgh’s Hill District with his father and brothers, the 30-year-old relocated to Canton, changed his name and reinvented himself as a middle-class haberdashery owner in Middle America.

In fact, by the winter of 1933, Stone had survived a 1929 bankruptcy and his chain of men’s clothing stores swelled to nine. His rollercoaster economic experience allowed him to empathize with Depression-stricken strangers in Canton.

Today, some Cantonians don’t have to imagine what life was like in 1933 — they are living it. According to census records, about 15.4 percent of families and 19.2 percent of the population are struggling below the poverty line, including 27.4 percent of those under age 18 and 11.3 percent of those over 65.

This Thanksgiving, however, three anonymous donors stepped forward, offering $100 grants to each of 150 needy families. “We’re thrilled at The Repository to help again,” Jeff Gauger, the paper’s executive editor, told The Associated Press. “Mr. Stone’s gift keeps on giving.”

Stone’s gift, contended Gup in an Associated Press interview, “shows the incredible power of a genuine selfless act.”

Gup believes the renewal of his grandfather’s charity is especially significant during the current fiscal downturn. “In a period in which we are throwing billions of dollars at the economy — the TARP, the bailouts, etc. — the notion that a human-size gift can still carry such potency goes to the heart of this story.”

That’s Canton for you. We should all sample a glass of that water.

December 07, 2010 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Canton, Helen Palm Kintz Grant, Jack Parr, Mother Angelica, Mr. B. Virdot, Ohio, Pro Football Hall of Fame, Sam Stone, Ted Gup, The (Canton) Repository, William McKinley

AT LEAST PORT HUENEME AVOIDED BEING INVADED

Hueneme_pier1 Published in the November 24, 2010 edition of the Ventura County Star

Question: Where can you report Google Map errors?
Answer: You can’t. Google doesn’t make mistakes.

For the past five years, the Ventura Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) website homepage featured a map of Ventura County that situated Port Hueneme about 10 miles southeast of its actual location. On this map, the sleepy little beach town/bustling port city and its approximately 23,000 residents could be found north of Highway 1 and inside the boundaries of Point Mugu State Park.

When I called to inquire about the obvious cartographical error, I was expecting somebody at the agency, which deals primarily in boundary changes for cities and special districts, to respond sympathetically. I thought the voice at the other end of the phone might say something like, “Oh, boy, is this embarrassing—we will look into it immediately.”

Instead, Deputy Executive Officer Kai Luoma got all huffy and defensive as he rattled off a list of “nots”—as in “this map is not official,” “this map is not to scale,” “this map has not been adopted by the County” and “this map is obviously a caricature—look at the smiling dolphin.”

Now bear in mind that that the LAFCO website---tongue in cheek, of course---cautions visitors against confusing the agency with a “hot new comedy club.” No problem with that---not only would I not mistake Luoma for a stand-up comic but I got the idea, in no uncertain terms, that my call was definitely no laughing matter.

If Luoma regularly read the Star, however, he would have been aware that some of the powers-that-be in Port Hueneme are so distressed about the city being known as “the best kept secret in Ventura County,” they are considering rebranding “Port Hueneme” as “Hueneme Beach.”

While it’s obviously not the function of the LAFCO website to promote Port Hueneme’s uncrowded stretch of golden sand, picturesque pier and well-lighted promenade, the agency might have been a tad bit more sensitive to thin skins, deeply tanned or otherwise.

I am happy to report that after a few emails from Dave Norman, Port Hueneme’s City Manager, the offensive visual has been permanently removed from the LAFCO website. If only the folks at Google Maps could prove to be as cooperative with their critics.

The Los Angeles Times reported Saturday that hostilities have intensified between Nicaragua and Costa Rica over a boundary brouhaha that evolved when, in early November, Eden Pastora, a Nicaraguan military commander, crossed over the border into Costa Rica and ordered his troops to take down the Costa Rican flag on Calero Island and replace it with the blue and white Nicaraguan colors.

Pastora told La Nacion, Costa Rica’s largest newspaper, that the incursion was not his fault because Google Maps depicted the territory as belonging to Nicaragua. According to Google Earth and Maps team members, the Costa Rica-Nicaraguan border, as shown on the Google map, could have been up to 2.7 kilometers off the mark. Of course, Google, which considers itself infallible, blamed the blunder on materials and maps provided by the U.S. State Department.

This is the same blame game employed by Google only last February in response to a request from Cambodia to correct a Google Earth map that Phnom Penh claimed was “devoid of truth and reality, and professionally irresponsible, if not pretentious.”

Google, in a letter provided to ABC news, said the internet giant was “carefully reviewing” the Cambodian government’s objection but also suggested that officials contact Tele Atlas, a mapping company that provided the border data to Google.

“We understand that the governments of both Thailand and Cambodia are pursuing bilateral negotiations to clarify the existing borders between the two countries,” wrote Ross LaJeunesse, Google’s head of public policy and government affairs for Asia Pacific, “and we would be happy to review any authoritative border data which the government of Cambodia can provide.”

Back to the Costa Rica-Nicaragua clash, the Organization of American States and UN Security Council, invited to prevail as well-modulated voices of reason, advised Nicaragua to remove its troops. When Nicaragua refused, Costa Rica countered by filing a lawsuit at the International Court of Justice in The Hague—hence the heat and heightened tension November 20.

Bing Maps, on the other hand, which managed to get the Costa Rica-Nicaraguan boundary right, could have stumbled upon a spanking-new marketing strategy, courtesy of Google’s ghastly gaffes: “Bing is the search engine that doesn’t get you into international hot water.”

Question: Where can you report Google Map errors?
Answer: Just make a large sign and stake it out in the middle of the questioned territory. It might take a couple of years, but Google will eventually get the message.

LAFCO, to their credit, got it much sooner.

November 24, 2010 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Bing Maps, Cambodia, Costa Rica, Dave Norman, Eden Pastora, Google Maps, LAFCO, Nicaragua, Thailand, Ventura Local Agency Formation Commission

Carnegie: America's First Friend of the Library


250px-Carneige_Art_Museum_2,_Oxnard Published in the November 10, 2010 edition of the Ventura County Star

On this very day in 1911, Andrew Carnegie established a corporation for scholarly and charitable works. He chose, as his mission statement, the lofty goal: “The advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding.”

Carnegie made a fortune, estimated at 60 percent of the total American economy, during the 19th century so-called “Age of the Robber Barons,” when income tax didn’t exist and government policy toward business was strictly laissez-faire.

The alleged “second richest man in the world” caused quite a stir in June 1889, however, when his article, “Wealth,” appeared in the North American Review. His provocative essay argued that so long as leaders of industry stimulated financial growth, they were a valuable, if not indispensible, national asset. But if these folks just piled up money for their own selfish pursuits, they were stealing from those to whom their capital actually belonged.

Carnegie further contended that not only had society as a whole created the wealth found concentrated in individual hands but those individual hands shared a moral obligation to return said wealth to society. The prosperous, he maintained, merely served as “trustees,” obliged to allocate their assets to benefit others.

A decade after he sold his steel company to J. P. Morgan, Carnegie, feeling each of his 76 years, and already having drained his bank account of $153 million in charitable donations, discovered, to his chagrin, not only had he merely reached the halfway point, but getting rid of sky-high piles of dollars was proving to be an exhausting chore.

To that end, Carnegie consulted his friend, Elihu Root, who would be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize the following year. Root suggested Carnegie transfer the bulk of his estate and the arduous philanthropic decision making that accompanied giving it away, to a trust. And that’s how the Carnegie Corporation of New York, with an original endowment of $3 billion, was signed into existence on Nov. 10, 1911.

Today, $3 billion, adjusted for inflation, comes to more than $67 billion, the same amount as the ill-gotten gains realized by Bernard Madoff via his notorious Ponzi scheme.

Carnegie’s scheme, however, appears to be a Ponzi in reverse.

During the last third of his life, Carnegie was all about giving, and he targeted the “industrious and ambitious; not those who need everything done for them, but those who, being most anxious and able to help themselves, deserve and will be benefited by help from others.”

Even prior to 1911, Carnegie had busied himself setting up various trust funds “for the improvement of mankind.” The first of these “get (Carnegie) poor quick” proposals would eventually establish thousands of free public libraries across the English-speaking world.

Books impacted Carnegie’s life in a positive way, beginning with the Tradesman’s Subscription Library founded by his father (William) in their Scottish hometown. Later, after immigrating to the United States and while working for the Allegheny Telegraph Company, Carnegie borrowed various edifying volumes from the personal library of Col. James Anderson, who, every Saturday, opened his collection to interested employees.

Carnegie, who preferred the label “distributor of wealth” rather than “philanthropist,” funded his first library in Dunfermline, Scotland in 1883. It’s quite telling that rather than his name, he had the motto “Let there be light” carved within its Gothic-arched entrance.

Between 1883 and 1929, very few municipalities requesting a construction grant and agreeing to Carnegie’s terms were refused. Of the 3, 500 American public libraries in existence by 1919, nearly half were constructed with Carnegie funds.

One such library, whose Doric columns suggest a Greek temple, graces South C Street in Oxnard. Presently known as the Carnegie Art Museum, in July 1971, the iconic structure became the first building in Ventura County to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

When the white neo-classic edifice first opened on May 15, 1907, it housed not only a first-class book collection but also Oxnard’s municipal offices and City Hall as well.

While hundreds of former Carnegie library buildings in the United States have been converted into museums, community centers, office buildings and residences, more than 50 percent still serve their communities as free public libraries. Many are located in middle- to low-income neighborhoods and have “become a force,” especially during this prolonged recession, as Pittsburg Library Director Herb Elis told the Pittsburg Post-Gazette, “to help bring these neighborhoods back.”

At a time when billions have been wasted stuffing our mailboxes with slick political advertisements, cluttering up the airwaves with nasty, mud-slinging spots and interrupting our peace and privacy with robocalls, don’t you wish the Carnegie “gospel” might get some traction with politicos?

I don’t know about you, but any candidate truly working toward “the advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding” will get my vote, every time.

November 10, 2010 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Andrew Carnegie, Bernard Madoff, Carnegie Art Museum, Carnegie Corporation of New York, Elihu Root, J.P. Morgan, libraries

FAMILY TREE LOADED DOWN WITH FACTS AND MYTHS


Ketchum3 Published in the October 27, 2010 edition of the Ventura County Star

You know it’s an election year by the number of politically motivated “forwards” clogging your e-mail.

According to a doozy that landed in my inbox, Judy Wallman, a professional genealogist from Southern California, allegedly stumbled across a snapshot purported to be the only extant portrait of Remus Reid, an ancestor common to both Wallman and Sen. Harry Reid.

The back of the picture was supposedly inscribed with “Remus Reid, horse thief, sent to Montana Territorial Prison 1885, escaped 1887, robbed the Montana Flyer six times. Caught by Pinkerton detectives, convicted and hanged in 1889.”

When Wallman requested more information about their mutual great-great uncle from Sen. Reid, she received what appears to be a staggering example of historic revisionism from one of Sen. Reid’s uber-inventive staff members.

The spin-meister wannabe claimed that Remus Reid achieved celebrity in Montana for an economic empire built from amassing “equestrian assets.” The memo went on to insist that Remus “passed away during an important civic function held in his honor when the platform upon which he was standing collapsed.”

A quick check with Snopes.com indicated that this particular hoax first started making the rounds in 2000 when Hillary Rodham Clinton was paired with Remus Rodham and Tipper Gore with Gunther Gore. A year later, another adaptation popped up featuring George W. Bush’s great-great uncle Chadsworth being unearthed by Laura Bush.

The subject of the photograph, however, was, in actuality, a train-robbing outlaw named Tom “Black Jack” Ketchum, who is undoubtedly a distant relative of some American citizen but, apparently, none of the politicos previously mentioned.

Earlier this month, Ancestry.com, an online family history resource with a database of five billion accessible records, was tickled silly to announce that Sarah Palin and President Obama appear to be 10th cousins — both finding a common ancestor in a Massachusetts pioneer named John Smith, whose claim to fame during the mid-1600s was earned defending Quakers against persecution. Furthermore, Rush Limbaugh and Obama also seem to qualify as 10th cousins, once removed. Richmond Terrell, a well-heeled landowner who arrived in this country during the 1650s, is the common kin. But wait, there’s more.

Not only does the former governor of Alaska share a family member with the Senate Majority Leader that Republicans love to hate but also both Palin and Reid boast ancestral ties to the best-selling conservative author Ann Coulter via Congregationalist minister John Lathrop, celebrated for his stirring 1770 sermon, “Innocent Blood Crying to God from the Streets of Boston.”

According to The New York Times, “We are glad to note that so many societies and orders of to-day are searching historical genealogy, not to find that the average American’s veins contain a minute drop of royal or noble blood transmitted from England, but in the spirit of preserving the memory of the great though humbly worked out deeds of our ancestors in the gloomy obscurities of the colonies in their forest-shadowed days.”

You won’t be surprised to learn that the previous purple prose initially appeared in the March 15, 1896, edition. The first surge of American interest in ancestry is dated to that year, as the nation witnessed a mushrooming of historical societies, pioneer associations, family reunions, and hereditary organizations such as the Daughters of the American Revolution or the Society of Mayflower Descendants.

Since then, fascination with genealogy seems to spike every 30 to 40 years as folks focus on heritage as sustenance in times of challenge, as the result of generational curiosity and/or as a concern about the future of the family as an institution.

Alex Haley’s landmark ABC series, “Roots,” which first aired in 1977, and reached a record-breaking 130 million viewers, sparked unprecedented attention to lineage even though experts have continued to dispute the accuracy of Haley’s research. A plagiarism suit brought by African-American novelist and anthropologist Harold Courlander likewise clouded Haley’s legacy.

Just last year, an estimated 50 million Americans busied themselves assembling family trees.

FamilySearch.org, which is a service provided by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, reports receiving 10 million hits per day on its Internet site.

Last March, Utah-based Ancestry.com teamed up with NBC for the “Who Do You Think You Are?” series that traced the family ties of Lisa Kudrow, Sarah Jessica Parker, Emmitt Smith, Matthew Broderick, Brooke Shields, Susan Sarandon and Spike Lee. Each episode attracted between 6 and 7 million viewers. While there wasn’t a single horse thief among the distant relatives of the aforementioned celebrities, what if there had been?

The author of “Invisible Man,” Ralph Ellison once observed: “Some people are your relatives but others are your ancestors, and you choose the ones you want to have as ancestors. You create yourself out of those values.” Right, Sen. Reid?

October 26, 2010 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: Alex Haley, Ancestry.com, Ann Coulter, Brooke Shields, Emmitt Smith, FamilySearch.org., Geroge W. Bush, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Judy Wallman, Lisa Kudrow, Matthew Broderick, President Obama, Ralph Ellison, Remus Reid, Rush Limbaugh, Sarah Jessica Parker, Sarah Palin, Sen. Harry Reid, Spike Lee, Susan Sarandon, Tipper Gore

BEACH CITY BY ANY OTHER NAME STILL DRAWS CROWDS

Obama_beach Published in the Ventura County Star on Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Barack Hussein Obama once noted, “My parents shared not only an improbable love, they shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation. They would give me an African name, Barack, or ‘blessed,’ believing that in a tolerant America, your name is no barrier to success.”

Indeed, even given his middle name, Obama was elected our 44th president. Unfortunately, however, today, 24 percent of Americans insist on believing he’s a Muslim.

Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter attributes the public’s misperception of Obama’s religious beliefs not to his name, but rather to the fact that “more and more voters don’t like him personally and so are increasingly ready to believe anything critical (and to them, being Muslim is a negative).”

So what should Obama do? Stephen Colbert thinks the president “needs to go to church harder.” Actually, Obama’s advisers are quietly reminding reporters that he prays daily devotionals, regularly phones pastors and attends church services at Camp David. Nobody is suggesting that Obama change his name.

Rebranding, however, is all the rage, these days, on Madison Avenue. According to the American Marketing Association, a brand is a name, logo, slogan or combination thereof that not only identifies but also differentiates. The brand is not just about getting your buyers to choose you over the competition, but rather about getting your buyers to perceive you as providing the best solution to their problem.

In terms of politics, being chosen over the competition is what happens before an election; being perceived as the best solution-provider is what happens during the following four years.

A successful brand, according to marketing experts, delivers a clear message, cements credibility, and emotionally connects the product with the intended target. In other words, the new brand accomplishes all of the above more effectively than the former brand.

The respective elected leadership in Port Hueneme and Oxnard are flirting with the possibility of city name change. The rationale behind proposals to turn Port Hueneme into Hueneme Beach or Oxnard into Oxnard Shores: The International City is that tourists and wallets fat with tourist dollars will flock to these two locales because of their proximity to sun, sand and surf.

Roger Brooks, founder and CEO of a Seattle firm that specializes in community branding, development, marketing and tourism was hired by the Oxnard Convention and Visitors Bureau to the tune of $125,000 in order to recast California’s 21st largest metropolis into a “destination city.”

Mayor Norm Griffaw piloted the less cost-intensive Port Hueneme branding committee with Councilwoman Sylvia Muñoz Schnopp as well as a cross section of city residents, including Bill Hoover, Sharon Osborne, Orvene Carpenter, Arlene Fraser and Ed Cristal.

Branding experts hold out the welcome promise that not only would a post-rebranding spike in taxes flood coffers depleted by a flaccid economy but the initial dollar cost of replacing city seal and name-carrying materials would, in no time, be returned in full.

Of course, any promise by a branding expert, no matter how welcome, is never accompanied by a money-back guarantee. In addition to outcome uncertainty is the expected furor aroused by change in general and identity change in particular.

Mayor Griffaw acknowledged that swapping Port Hueneme for Hueneme Beach, even though three major name changes (Wynema to Hueneme to Port Hueneme) have punctuated its 154-year history, is a passion-inducing issue that deserves an up-or-down vote by residents.

On the other hand, while Brooks expected controversy over the switch to Oxnard Shores, the branding expert claims more than 90 percent of Oxnard citizens are in support of the change.

Port Hueneme might have been named after Henry T. Oxnard, who, with his brothers Benjamin, James and Robert, initially sought to set up a sugar beet operation next to the wharf in Hueneme. Negotiations with Thomas Bard went south, however, and in 1897, the brothers were enticed to build the $2 million redbrick factory with its landmark twin smokestacks farther up the road. Henry originally planned to christen the town Zachari, the Greek word for “sugar.” Ironically, none of the Oxnard brothers ever resided in their namesake city.

Only two other Ventura County cities have formally changed their names. During the early 1900s, the U.S. Postal Service officially recognized Simiopolis, the former moniker of Simi Valley. In 1874, real estate developer R.G. Surdam christened his project in honor of “Mutiny on the Bounty” co-author Charles Nordhoff. During World War I, however, when anti-German sentiment swept the fruited plain, Nordhoff was jettisoned in favor of Ojai — Chumash for “Valley of the Moon.”

Forget the name game. Once the economy perks up, not only will Obama regain his “committed Christian” status but Port Hueneme and Oxnard will cheerfully make do with the same old stationery. Tourists can always find a beach.

October 13, 2010 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: " Newsweek poll, "name no barrier to success, Arlene Fraser, Barack Hussein Obama, Bill Hoover, Charles Nordhoff, Ed Cristal, Henry T. Oxnard, Hueneme Beach, Jonathn Alter, Norm Griffaw, Orvene Carpenter, Oxnard Shores, rebranding, Roger Brooks, Sharon Osborne, Simiopolis, Stephen Colbert, Sylvia Muñoz Schnopp, The International City, Thomas Bard, “committed Christian”

THELMA HANSEN'S DREAM BEING PLOWED UNDER

Faulkner_Farm,_Santa_Paula,_California Published in the September 29, 2010 edition of the Ventura County Star

If you watched Jamie Oliver’s “Food Revolution,” a six-week ABC reality show that aired March-April of this year, you were probably shocked to see elementary schoolchildren who can’t identify a tomato, cauliflower, beet or eggplant but can readily distinguish a chicken nugget, piece of pizza or order of fries.

Children don’t recognize what they don’t eat and they don’t eat what they don’t recognize.

Faulkner Farm is trying to change all that in Ventura County. Last year, according to the Hansen Trust annual report, 24,000 people participated in educational programs or attended the annual Rotary Club of Santa Paula-sponsored pumpkin patch — a 35-year Ventura County tradition that nets nearly $100,000 per annum for local nonprofits.

Not only did Thelma Hansen dream big, but she also donated a fortune to the University of California to make her dream come true. When she passed away in 1993, her $12 million legacy became the Hansen Trust, which is charged with the mission “to sustain agriculture in Ventura County through research and education to benefit the community as a whole.”

To that end, in 1997, the historic 27-acre Faulkner Farm in Santa Paula was purchased for $1.5 million. The deal included a landmark red barn erected in 1886 as well as a stately two-story 1894 Victorian house listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

However, two months ago, a majority of the Hansen Trust advisory board recommended placing Faulkner Farm on the market.

Chris Sayer, Edgar Terry and John Krist provided the rationale behind this injudicious judgment in a Star op-ed. “Far from advancing agricultural education and preservation,” they argued, “ownership of the property has saddled the organization with crippling financial and logistical burdens. As a result, the UC Hansen Trust finds itself unable to carry out the wishes of Thelma Hansen.”

If you detect a whiff of manure while reading this statement, you are not alone.

First, let’s take a gander at the so-called “crippling financial and logistical burden” by consulting the most recent Hansen Trust annual report.

Oops — nothing more recent than 2008-2009 budget figures have been posted online. Guess Krist et al can claim just about anything they wish if they don’t have to provide a cost-benefit analysis.

What can be gleaned from earlier budgets, however, is that there is a state budget category that provides about $50,000 per year for historic preservation. A reserve of $120,000 exists as well. Best advice? Amortize.

Krist et al insist, “Only 10 percent of the trust’s annual budget of approximately $1 million is now available for direct support of activities benefiting local agriculture.” That can’t possibly mean farm subsidies, can it?

According to the annual report from last year, no single line item benefits local agriculture, yet $415,103, which is nearly 40 percent of the budget, did go to such mission-friendly programs as “research and extension,” “education outreach” and “agriculture literacy and issues.”

The trio further alleged, “this year, the trust was able to fund only about a quarter of the grant proposals it received for research and education.” The 2008-2009 report lists $14,603 in “unused grant funds.” That’s right, “unused.” By the way, funding one in four proposals is considered quite generous in academia.

Salaries and benefits invariably take the biggest budget bite. Supposedly, 13 full-time equivalent employees labor at Faulkner Farm but how many hours are spent maintaining the house and barn? Furthermore, what is the specific staffing plan if the trust decides to purchase land elsewhere?

It’s time for full disclosure. Laurence Peter, when asked about lying with numbers, quipped, “Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are much more pliable.”

Mike Mobley, spokesman for the freshly constituted “Save Faulkner Farm” and member of the Santa Paula Rotary told the Santa Paula Times, “We just can’t believe they’ve made this decision without any community input, and elected to ignore 20 years of decisions by previous board members, their own staff and the community.”

That’s right. Where was the transparency in this process? If the board actually has nothing to hide — why scheme in secret, why gag employees and why not invite stakeholders to the table, especially “the community as a whole” addressed in their mission statement?

When confronted with the concealment charge, chairman of the advisory board Chris Sayer told the Santa Paula Times, “These discussions were part of regularly scheduled meetings. It’s the difference,” he added, “between hiding something and not advertising something.” Yes, indeed — subtle distinction duly noted.

In his Star op-ed piece, Larry Yee, co-founder of the UC Hansen Trust, believes Ms. Hansen “would be outraged” to learn that the current board is attempting to destroy her dream.

I invite all FOTs (Friends of Thelma) to fire off a mad-as-hell e-mail

Do it for our kids — even if you still hate eggplant.

September 28, 2010 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (1)

Technorati Tags: Jamie Oliver, " Faulkner Farm, "Food Revolution, Chris Sayer, Hansen Trust, Larry Yee, Laurence Peter, Mike Mobley, Santa Paula Rotary Club, Thelma Hansen, University of California, Ventura County

SOCIAL SECURITY QUIP RANKLES WOMEN'S GROUPS


Grand_tetons_wyoming_usa1Published in the September 15, 2010 edition of the Ventura County Star

Will somebody please explain to me why I, as an older woman, am supposed to be ticked off at former Sen. Alan Simpson?

Sept. 5, Dan K. Thomasson charged — in my favorite newspaper, no less, “a huge number of women will call into question Simpson’s dedication to their causes.”

So what did this alleged prairie home misogynist do?

Simpson, the co-chair of President Barack Obama’s Fiscal Responsibility and Reform Commission, inserted his size 15 loafer into his uber-acerbic mouth, when, in an e-mail to National Older Women’s League’s Ashley Carson, he linked Social Security and a milk cow with 310 million teats — only Simpson didn’t type “teats.”

Simpson was, for the second time, channeling H. L. Mencken, who, during the 1930s, compared Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “New Deal” to “a milk cow with 25 million teats.”

The first time the Wyoming Republican channeled Mencken, he was speaking to the 1992 National Conference of State Legislatures about Social Security, veterans benefits and other programs rendering America “a milk cow with 250 million tits.”

So why, now, did everybody from the National Older Women’s League to Social Security Works to the National Organization for Women have a cow? Why were special-interest lobbyists calling for Simpson’s ouster from the commission as well as calling him such derisive names as “sexist” and “ageist”?

Not only are these folks udderly serious about labeling one of the Senate’s funniest men “politically incorrect” — they are also claiming to speak for me.

Simpson didn’t insult yours truly. My advice: lighten up, embrace the First Amendment and speak for yourselves.

I actually took a gander at the column that propelled Simpson into an apoplectic cyberdiatribe. What I discovered in the piece the executive director of OWL pounded out for the Huffington Post is that bloggers, unhappily, aren’t held to the same professional standard as journalists.

Apparently, Carson is unaware that generalizations should be backed up by facts, that quotations must not be cherry-picked out of context and that ad hominem attacks, no matter how stridently delivered, fail to advance an argument at any time. The elevation of Simpson’s ire as he poured over Carson’s piece, “Enough with the Pink Panthers Bit,” should have been no surprise.

Yet, the senator served up a speedy plea for forgiveness: “I apologize for what I wrote. I can see that my remarks have caused you anguish, and that was not my intention. I certainly did not intend to diminish your hard work for the Older Women’s League. I know you care deeply about strengthening Social Security, and so do I, just as deeply.”

Detractors claim that Social Security, the third rail of politics, remains outside the purview of the National Commission of Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. Yet, Obama’s board is not only tasked with cracking the deficit in the short-term but also with tackling “the growth of entitlement spending” in the long run. Social Security unquestionably qualifies for scrutiny under the commission’s mission statement.

The 79-year-old Simpson’s position on Social Security is simple: America must confront Social Security’s insolvency issues sooner rather than later. Not only is Simpson’s view held by most economists but his recommended methodology — making minor adjustments over the next 25 years — better protects the most vulnerable oldsters than playing ostrich.

In his nasty-gram to Carson, the salty Simpson asked, “If you have some better suggestions about how to stabilize Social Security instead of just babbling into the vapors, let me know.”

She has yet to do so.

Most attorneys are aware that when you have the facts on your side, you argue the facts; when you have the law on your side, you argue the law and when you don’t have facts or the law on your side, you pound the table. Carson et al excel at table-pounding.

While Social Security isn’t responsible for America’s current fiscal difficulties — it will be when the Social Security Trust Fund reserves, which make up the difference between payroll taxes and benefit claims, dry up. In his e-missive to Carson, Simpson points out that Stephen C. Goss, the program’s chief actuary, projects in 27 short years that Social Security will pay only 76 percent of scheduled benefits.

If the commission does its job properly, it will recommend tax increases as well as across-the-board cuts to the Pentagon, social programs, entitlements and veterans’ benefits. Otherwise, we end up impoverishing the future of our children and our children’s children.

As to the finger-pointers from OWL, Social Security Works and NOW — stop looking for reasons to take offense and start listening to what Simpson is actually saying. Methinks not only doth thou protest too much — but thou art making a mountain out of a molehill. And, in case you forgot — Wyoming is home to the Grand Tetons.

September 22, 2010 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Alan Simpson, Ashley Carson, Dan K. Thomasson, Fiscal Responsibility and Reform Commission, H. L. Mencken, National Organization for Women, prairie home misogynist, Social Security Works

TODAY'S LEARNERS TAKE NOT OF OLD-SCHOOL WAYS


Back-to-school-colorful-child-writing Published in the August 31, 2010 edition of the Ventura County Star

Finished your back-to-school shopping yet? As I gird my loins for yet another year, the only school supplies I purchased were a couple of Pilot G-2 red pens and three sturdy file folders. The most important item I needed was free — the latest edition of the Beloit College Mindset list.

A catalog assembled by Tom McBride and Ron Nief, the Beloit College Mindset list is supposed to help university faculty avoid making out-of-date references. The inventory discloses what the current freshman class knows and doesn’t know about the world. When you have been teaching as long as I have, you are abundantly aware that your cultural references are not necessarily those of the Class of 2014.

In fact, these days, instead of merely rolling their eyeballs to indicate that I have soared to unparalleled heights of corniness, my students freeze their faces in a “What’s that you say?” grimace if I am foolish enough to attempt my Dirty Harry impression.

But I worry not. My popularity gets a mega-boost every time I reveal, off-handedly and with uncharacteristic modesty, that I actually attended Woodstock — back in the day.

Born when Bill Clinton was apologizing for causing pain in his marriage, my young scholars were never forced to master cursive penmanship, yet, according to McBride and Nief, are superfluent in “caramel macchiato” and “venti half-caf vanilla latte.”

The Class of 2014 will never experience the calming effect produced by mindlessly twisting the coiled handset cord on a wall phone — especially when the object of your affection is on the other end. For kids born in 1992, in fact, phones never had cords. Furthermore, their cells have always doubled as cameras and remain the primary reason millennials eschew wristwatches.

For this freshman class, Czechoslovakia has never existed but HIV-positive athletes have always competed in the Olympics. They first met Michelangelo as a computer virus, consider Beethoven a good name for a dog, and believe Al Gore is an animated character on “The Simpsons.”

When I was dispatched to college during the ’60s, my instructors would scrawl illegible words on dusty chalkboards. I pounded out multiple drafts of assignments on a nonelectric typewriter. My exams and supplementary reading materials were produced by ditto masters that turned hands, face and clothes — purple. Professors, available by appointment only, met undergraduates in intimidating, smoke-filled offices.

My students, however, insist on being entertained via media-rich PowerPoint presentations that embed video, colorful graphics and flying text. They want to be able to rent textbooks or have them delivered to their e-readers. They demand daily electronic reminders of due dates and upcoming assignment announcements. Since they are all for saving trees, they require that materials, including the course syllabus, be paperless. Professors now make themselves available 24/7, via e-mail, text or cell phone.

A couple of years ago, I noticed that students taking notes were no longer clacking away on keyboards but employing time-consuming longhand instead. Talk about old school! When I polled my freshmen about this technological step backward, I gleaned two hypotheses.

The first had to do with the elimination of typing classes in high school. It wasn’t that these kids were unfamiliar with QWERTY — they could text at mind-numbing speeds. In fact, they had grown jaw-droppingly efficient with just two thumbs. The problem was that you can’t really summarize lectures on a cell phone. Touch-typing, which is simple and speedy, does require the use of all 10 digits.

The second explanation held that ever since junior high, computers had been banned from classrooms. No, their teachers weren’t Luddites — they were just sick and tired of competing for their students’ attention with the World Wide Web and social networking sites.

Instead of figuring out a way for pupils and Wi-Fi-enabled computers to co-exist, administrators, in a lockstep, zero-tolerance response, ruled that laptops must remain at home. Note-taking became the laborious process it had been in my day. It also forced the lecturer to either accommodate the slowest writer in class or to provide pupils with photocopies of PowerPoints.

Unfortunately, the latter seriously cheats learners because they never acquire the ability to organize, evaluate and retain what they’re being told. Without taking their own notes, not only are they unprepared to think critically about the material, but numerous studies, conducted since 1925, report that note-taking itself is an integral part of the learning process.

McBride and Nief note that the Class of 2014 “will now be awash with a computerized technology that will not distinguish information (from) knowledge.”

No, information and knowledge are not synonymous. Hopefully, bona- fide teachers, even if not as hip and happening as we’d like to be, will possess the wisdom to clarify the difference.

We’d all shop for that.

September 22, 2010 in Ventura County Star Columns | Permalink | Comments (0)

Technorati Tags: Beloit College Mindset, Class of 2014, information, knowledge, note-taking, technology, Tom McBride and Ron Nief

»